Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Well since PJ is probably starting this Sunday, I watched the highlights from his only other start.


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

There is no difference. Both QBs had no shot at being the answer.

Nobody thinks PJ Walker is the long term answer at QB for the Panthers.  Hes the backup QB, who has a decent shot at actually playing on Sunday.  If you want the Panthers to win, you should want PJ to be good. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

PJ isn’t any good either lol so I don’t see your point? PJ shouldn’t even be on an nfl roster!

Hes a backup QB...how many backup QBs out there are "good"?  If they were any good they would be a starter somewhere.  Hell, there are not even 32 "good" starting QBs out there.  Playing QB in the NFL is really hard, if you haven't already noticed. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, joemac said:

Are there really people who dont want Sam to be good, or is he just really not any good?  There is a difference.

Yes there are. They want him benched, traded, cut, etc. They have no desire to see him on the field ever again. Yet they want to see what PJ has. Odd. Why? To scrape up a few wins? Sam gives us a better chance at that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Yes there are. They want him benched, traded, cut, etc. They have no desire to see him on the field ever again. Yet they want to see what PJ has. Odd. Why? To scrape up a few wins? Sam gives us a better chance at that.

Yeah, well there are a lot of dumbasses and trolls on this website, so.....

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Then why don't people want Sam to be good?

 

2 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Yes there are. They want him benched, traded, cut, etc. They have no desire to see him on the field ever again. Yet they want to see what PJ has. Odd. Why? To scrape up a few wins? Sam gives us a better chance at that.

You mean like how folks did with Cam for years? Whew buddy how things come full circle. Life is ironic.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Yes there are. They want him benched, traded, cut, etc. They have no desire to see him on the field ever again. Yet they want to see what PJ has. Odd. Why? To scrape up a few wins? Sam gives us a better chance at that.

Why? Well, if you play PJ a couple games then Matt Rhule can’t get away with pretending his college QB deserves a roster spot for a 3rd straight season.  

then next season we hopefully don’t have Sam or PJ occupying roster spots.    Both are pointless. 

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...