Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers add another USC QB - Barkley

CRA

By CRA,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, Dorian Gray said:

Cam at 20% of his old self is still 200x better than PJ and Matt Barkley. It's frustrating because Tepper expects fans to keep investing time and money into the team this season when it's clear they're not giving us the best chance to succeed on the field, mainly due to ego. At this point I'm surprised Rhule couldn't find an old Temple or Baylor QB to poach from somewhere.

I dont think he cares which fans invest in it. We have the WFT, Falcons, and Bucs for our remaining home games. All of them have pretty big fanbases so the games will sell out and be 70% opposing fans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
  • Author
Posted
26 minutes ago, rayzor said:

here's something to ponder....how many QBs did they have to ask before Barkley said yes?

I saw Tony Pike last night at Target and told me he just laughted when he saw the caller ID and didn't pick up.  

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, AceMan said:

On point, @rayzor!!!

A couple early signs point to Carolina being an unfavorable destination for QBs..

 

if you want to be left alone and collect a check it might be nice.  Apparently Matt Rhule had his first real conversation with Sam Darnold just the other week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brooklyn 3.0 Grand Master

Brooklyn 3.0

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

“I don’t know why the people don’t hate him like i do!!!”


Cam threads and commentary will stop once the Panthers 1.) start winning, 2.) have a player that makes an impact that was greater than his. 
 

It’s really that simple. You’re a smart guy, you should know this. You crying about Cam threads is just as redundant as the Cam threads being created. You don’t like them, don’t click and enter them. We know you can’t do that, though. 

You're right. And you lot can't stop replying to me doing it. Like I said ... guess we all wait until he retires.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, Darknight said:

Exactly why Im glad we passed on Fields

The actual issue was Urban Meyer QBs.   Those are the ones that set a trend.  Consistent trend of those in his offense not working out.  From FL to Ohio St. 

but Fields didn't play for Urban and in his offense.   That's why the narrative was irrelevant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darknight Community Regular

Darknight

Posted
Posted
Just now, CRA said:

The actual issue was Urban Meyer QBs.   Those are the ones that set a trend.  Consistent trend of those in his offense not working out.  From FL to Ohio St. 

but Fields didn't play for Urban and in his offense.   That's why the narrative was irrelevant. 

I disagree. Me personally, I really don't like QBs from big schools like Alabama, OSU, USC just to name of a few because they have talent at the skill positions. I was on board with us drafting Cam Newton because I saw what he did with Auburn and that 2nd half come back against Alabama.

Fields could be that guy and I could be wrong but I wasn't up in arms and pissed when we didn't take Fields. I know people wanted Fields but I'm in the minority. I didn't want him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
  • Author
Posted
52 minutes ago, Darknight said:

I disagree. Me personally, I really don't like QBs from big schools like Alabama, OSU, USC just to name of a few because they have talent at the skill positions. I was on board with us drafting Cam Newton because I saw what he did with Auburn and that 2nd half come back against Alabama.

Fields could be that guy and I could be wrong but I wasn't up in arms and pissed when we didn't take Fields. I know people wanted Fields but I'm in the minority. I didn't want him.

well, that technically is a different argument IMO than what is suggested by just saying Ohio St QBs.  Given the specific narrative around the guys that played there of late. 

I don't disagree with what you are saying entirely.   Bama is a great example.   The talent disparity between Bama and even other top programs is often big.   

I was down w/ Fields largely because he had Brent Venebles beat twice on the big stage despite only getting one win.    There really are only a handful of games that mean much with the mega programs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, CRA said:

 Apparently Matt Rhule had his first real conversation with Sam Darnold just the other week. 

Wonder if that is some college poo...like does Rhule have this mentality like "i don't have to talk to these kids they do what I say and I hold their future in my hands" - oh wait these are professional men.

Hmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, CRA said:

The actual issue was Urban Meyer QBs.   Those are the ones that set a trend.  Consistent trend of those in his offense not working out.  From FL to Ohio St. 

but Fields didn't play for Urban and in his offense.   That's why the narrative was irrelevant. 

Could be. Will take some time to verify but when you watch his offense in college the WRs were often just wide the fug open and even the 'good QBs' he had in college didn't throw it the best even to those wide open WRs a lot of the time. And OFC among the best recruits.

Looks like the OU QBs atm are doing pretty well of late and they were known for producing bust QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darknight Community Regular

Darknight

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, CRA said:

well, that tecncially a different argument IMO than what is suggested by saying Ohio St QBs.  Given the specific narrative around the guys that played there of late. 

I don't disagree with what you are saying entirely.   Bama is a great example.   The talent disparity between Bama and even other top programs is often big.   

I was down w/ Fields largely because he had Brent Venebles beat twice on the big stage despite only getting one win.    There really are only a handful of games that mean much with the mega programs. 

I can get behind this reasoning for wanting Fields. 

I know plenty of people are upset that we got Darnold instead. I'm happy that the organization tried to get Stafford. I'm happy that the organization got rid of Teddy. I'm happy that the organization wanted to get Watson. Even though it appears that Darnold was the wrong choice for QB, I'm at least glad that the organization tried to address the problem. They are not twiddling their thumbs. I'm disappointed that they picked up his 5th Year option before he even played a snap. I wouldn't have done that but oh well.

I bet in the off-season they will try to fix the offensive line and I bet they will get a QB too.

Oh. I'm done with Joe Brady.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • strato
      Where panthers draft ranked against Big Boards in 2023

      By strato · Posted

      Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • PleaseCutStewart
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By PleaseCutStewart · Posted

      Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...