Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Brady play designs be like:


Fox007
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Carolina Cajun said:

Makes Sense why Cam got a grasp of the whole playbook.  Basically he came into the facility, asked for the playbook and Brady gave him a napkin that said "plz save my job"

This x1000. I give it one maybe two more games and everyone will be back to throwing shade at the biggest issue on offense which happens to be a coach in way over his head. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool pic. Can you show the route tree? Was this a flood concept vs zone? If nothing else can you post the All 22 of this play? I can figure out the route tree myself from that. I hate how the TV copy doesn't show enough to see WR routes, but I don't care enough to pay for the All 22.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

Looks like at least 2 open receivers. He can't cover both and isn't in a good place yo cover either while 22 is wide open.

I'm not big on Brady but not sure what you are seeing here.

Just based on the picture, this is probably a flood on that side of the field with Robby on the go route, Marshall with a dig, and CMC was probably a curl or something underneath. The corner is going to have to make a choice who to cover -- hand Marshall off to the LB'ers or help the safety with Robby. All 3 appear to be in position to have leverage once the break occurs. IIRC this was a 3rd and short play, ball went to CMC and he got a first down, which was the safe choice on 3rd down, as he'd be the first to be ready and at the sticks, especially if there's pressure.

All that ^ is speculation though based on a picture that could literally be just about anything. Marshall might be running the wrong route for all we know. The ball went to CMC, so I doubt either Marshall or Robby completed their routes so honestly, even with All 22, we'll never know what this play is suppose to look like, all we can do is guess.

TL;DR - people are dumb and you can't usually tell much from a still image from a football game. Only a moron would think this picture says anything one way or another about the playcall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

Just based on the picture, this is probably a flood on that side of the field with Robby on the go route, Marshall with a dig, and CMC was probably a curl or something underneath. The corner is going to have to make a choice who to cover -- hand Marshall off to the LB'ers or help the safety with Robby. All 3 appear to be in position to have leverage once the break occurs. IIRC this was a 3rd and short play, ball went to CMC and he got a first down, which was the safe choice on 3rd down, as he'd be the first to be ready and at the sticks, especially if there's pressure.

All that ^ is speculation though based on a picture that could literally be just about anything. Marshall might be running the wrong route for all we know. The ball went to CMC, so I doubt either Marshall or Robby completed their routes so honestly, even with All 22, we'll never know what this play is suppose to look like, all we can do is guess.

TL;DR - people are dumb and you can't usually tell much from a still image from a football game. Only a moron would think this picture says anything one way or another about the playcall.

Exactly. Plenty to critique without reaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...