Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Adjustment question, Djax


cardiackat88.
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, CRA said:

Gilmore was on the field playing coverage on both McLaurin's two biggest first half plays.  The long bomb down the sideline and then the TD.  He just wasn't on McLaurin. 

He was on the field on the first one, not the second.

At the beginning of the game he was mostly playing on 3rd down and passing situations, then he had a series he didn't play much at all and then the series right before the half he played almost the entire series.  I quit rewatching in the thrid.

it's clear they are limiting his snaps and mostly using him in passing situations, not the other way around.

Maybe he isn't 100%, even when he does come in they are leaving Donte on the other team's #1?

Either they did a really good job of attacking us passing on early downs which is rather surprising for a RR team.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

Everyone who matched up with McLaurin had a tough time outside of Gilmore. In Jackson’s case, this was his most disappointing performance of 2021 by a considerable margin.

I'd be curious to know the yardage he gave up vs the Vikings.  Had to be over 100.   But there was at least some nice plays mixed in.  I can't recall any from Sunday. 

The games he faced an actual test were the Washington, Vikings, and Dallas games.  To me, he just looked like the guy we have always watched.  Steady mix of good and bad.   Everyone else had garbage QBs or garbage WRs.   

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

He was on the field on the first one, not the second.

At the beginning of the game he was mostly playing on 3rd down and passing situations, then he had a series he didn't play much at all and then the series right before the half he played almost the entire series.  I quit rewatching in the thrid.

it's clear they are limiting his snaps and mostly using him in passing situations, not the other way around.

Maybe he isn't 100%, even when he does come in they are leaving Donte on the other team's #1?

Either they did a really good job of attacking us passing on early downs which is rather surprising for a RR team.

 

 

Gilmore was in the long bomb down the left sideline to McLaurin that setup the first TD and the McLaurin TD at the end of the first half. 

2:50 mark and 6:10 mark

2nd half they flipped and started putting Gilmore on McLaurin.  Which indicates that was purely a coaching calling in the first half IMO of who they wanted matched up.   I think the staff over values speed.  Yeah, Jackson is faster than Gilmore.  McLaurin got real wheels.   But the coaching staff clearly acknowledged they needed Gilmore to solve the problem and they could of been doing what they did in the 2nd half all first half.  Gilmore was still on the field for the biggest plays he made in the first half. 

Not putting Gilmore on him from the jump was just dumb.  McLaurin is what gets that O going.  Everyone knows it.  We opted to let him get going despite having the easy answer to it. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, CRA said:

I'd be curious to know the yardage he gave up vs the Vikings.  Had to be over 100.   But there was at least some nice plays mixed in.  I can't recall any from Sunday. 

The games he faced an actual test were the Washington, Vikings, and Dallas games.  To me, he just looked like the guy we have always watched.  Steady mix of good and bad.   Everyone else had garbage QBs or garbage WRs.   

 

Thelein went off Davin Cook ran all over us..

I don’t remember if Donte was on Jefferson or Thelein..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, CRA said:

Gilmore was in the long bomb down the left sideline to McLaurin that setup the first TD and the McLaurin TD at the end of the first half. 

2:50 mark and 6:10 mark

2nd half they flipped and started putting Gilmore on McLaurin.  Which indicates that was purely a coaching calling in the first half IMO of who they wanted matched up.   I think the staff over values speed.  Yeah, Jackson is faster than Gilmore.  McLaurin got real wheels.   But the coaching staff clearly acknowledged they needed Gilmore to solve the problem and they could of been doing what they did in the 2nd half all first half.  Gilmore was still on the field for the biggest plays he made in the first half. 

Not putting Gilmore on him from the jump was just dumb.  McLaurin is what gets that O going.  Everyone knows it.  We opted to let him get going despite having the easy answer to it. 

I was referring to his two long catches in the first half since you said his "biggest plays".

I agree it might be just a coaching decision, my comment was in regards to you saying we using Gilmore more on running downs, that not correct.  Form the most part they seem to be using him more on 3rd and passing situations, who they have him cover when he is on the field is a different discussion.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, CRA said:

I'd be curious to know the yardage he gave up vs the Vikings.  Had to be over 100.   But there was at least some nice plays mixed in.  I can't recall any from Sunday. 

The games he faced an actual test were the Washington, Vikings, and Dallas games.  To me, he just looked like the guy we have always watched.  Steady mix of good and bad.   Everyone else had garbage QBs or garbage WRs.   

 

I am wondering if the Panthers will even sign Donte Jackson next year.  They plenty of options next year at Corner Back.  A.J. Bouye, Stephon Gilmore, Donte Jackson, and Rashaan Melvin all veteran guys and younger Jaycee Horn, C.J. Henderson, and Keith Taylor Jr. Gilmore.

Donte Jackson, and Rashaan Melvin are in the final year of their current deals. Meanwhile, Bouye is under contract through the 2022 season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...