Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So does PJ start next week? Does anyone even care?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mav1234 said:

Heineke was only on a roster last year because of tons of injuries and he knew the offense. It wasn't like he was carefully developed.  He made the most of the opportunities he got last year and that's why he's playing now.  Sometimes backups have that happen.   

I have no dislike of the XFL.  I legitimately have no problem with PJ. He's just not very good unfortunately, or at least hasn't been to date. Maybe that'll change some day... 

 

it doesn't matter how heineke got there, hes there now. you and a lot of nfl fans have this puritan status quo mentality that says, a qb has to have this college background, and drafted this high or hes no good. that mentality no longer works in todays nfl. there are several situations similar to this that have people wondering if the first round pick even matters anymore. i dont think it does. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/28/2021 at 3:18 PM, glenwo2 said:

Of course it was 'cause Cam can do no wrong.  lol

 

 

I don't  think anyone has said Cam can do no wrong. Cam came off the couch and has had no time really to learn the offense  or no real time with the line or the wrs. He was bound to have a bad game. I wasn't  thinking this bad but I knew it was coming. This needs to play out. He deserves a chance to see if he can be aa starter. You brought him in half season gone and bc he didn't  play well you stop him from starting. If he was the sole reason why u lost I could entertain it but he wasn't.  You made him the starter for the rest of the season the moment you brought him back. You have to ride this out.

Edited by Darvinsun
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/28/2021 at 10:25 PM, Tinamedina said:

 

yall said that about taylor heineke. they both were in the XFL, same career, difference is washington allowed heineke to develop, allowed him to make mistakes and learn from them. and pj walker is the better player out of him and heineke. the panthers have not developed a qb since cam newton. they need to pull a washington, but they are not using common sense, they are just reaching and panicking.

They didn't  developed Cam either. That is why his career is shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

Did you not see what Taylor did last year in the playoff game? The 2nd half against us?

This year against us?

The throws he was making against Seattle. 

He's head and shoulders better than PJ

 

You put Heiniche with a bad OC, a horrible OL, and throw him out in games down two scores.....it's gonna be real ugly too. 

it's all the extreme game I don't buy into.  Jackson is now a top 5 DB.  Sam a possible MVP.  Extend Cam after Washington, retire him the next week. 

Heiniche and PJ largely have been the same tier QBs.  Heiniche just in a good spot and getting opportunity.  Maybe he will keep developing.  I'm rooting for him. 

I judge PJ on his two starts.  If you watered him, gave him some sun and took care of him he might could grow too.  Might not.  But people are way too hard on a backup QB who has won his 2 starts in the NFL. 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tinamedina said:

 

it doesn't matter how heineke got there, hes there now. you and a lot of nfl fans have this puritan status quo mentality that says, a qb has to have this college background, and drafted this high or hes no good. that mentality no longer works in todays nfl. there are several situations similar to this that have people wondering if the first round pick even matters anymore. i dont think it does. 

I don't know why you think I need a QB to be drafted high or even at all.  That isn't the case at all. I've been huge fans of the various undrafted or low round QBs we've had come through as backs turned starters.

 On the other hand, it does seem high first round draft pick QBs are the most reliable way to find a franchise leader. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mav1234 said:

I don't know why you think I need a QB to be drafted high or even at all.  That isn't the case at all. I've been huge fans of the various undrafted or low round QBs we've had come through as backs turned starters.

 On the other hand, it does seem high first round draft pick QBs are the most reliable way to find a franchise leader. 

 

Don't waste your time. It's the PJ stan's alt. Just like Rhule can't be saved as a coach, some of these poeple can't be saved with logic.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CRA said:

You put Heiniche with a bad OC, a horrible OL, and throw him out in games down two scores.....it's gonna be real ugly too. 

it's all the extreme game I don't buy into.  Jackson is now a top 5 DB.  Sam a possible MVP.  Extend Cam after Washington, retire him the next week. 

Heiniche and PJ largely have been the same tier QBs.  Heiniche just in a good spot and getting opportunity.  Maybe he will keep developing.  I'm rooting for him. 

I judge PJ on his two starts.  If you watered him, gave him some sun and took care of him he might could grow too.  Might not.  But people are way too hard on a backup QB who has won his 2 starts in the NFL. 

I agree with everything you're saying but I don't think we can bank on PJ being anything.  Not saying cut him etc... He's the best option at backup atm. I don't blame him (hell, or Darnold) for not being better, I blame the coaches. 

That doesn't make PJ better than particular other players like heineke right this second tho.  Frankly I hope a new offensive staff can come in and evaluate all our QBs in the offseason.  Maybe they can make something of PJ as a backup who knows.

Edited by mav1234
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heiniche is not the most durable QB. People acting like he will take WTF to a SB is kind of funny, maybe back in the 80s.

Injury History

Date League Injury Details
Jul 19, 2016 Non-NFL Pedal Ankle Fracture Heinicke tore his left ankle in mid-July 2016.
Aug 31, 2017 NFL Head Cranial Concussion Grade 2 Heinicke suffered a concussion in the preseason finale against the Miami Dolphins and was placed on IR
Dec 23, 2018 NFL Arm Elbow Sprain Heinicke suffered a left elbow injury during Carolina's Week 16 loss to the Falcons. He was placed on IR
Jan 9, 2021 NFL Shoulder A/C Joint Sprain Heinicke suffered an AC joint sprain during the wild-card loss to the Buccaneers. Nothing was too serious as he was able to finish the game

 

He is having a great year for him, still 16 TDs to 10 INTs in his 4th year is hardly anything to put on a pedestal. 

PJ is more fun to watch than some of the guys in his tier but I have little belief he can win or win constantly. If he played 4 games in a row things would get real ugly with the film being out there. 

Then again, it doesn't take much film to predict this offense at this point. It's a place for talent to go and die, not thrive. 

Edit: LOL he is 28. Just lol. 

 

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/1/2021 at 2:27 AM, Tinamedina said:

 

and yall said that about taylor heineke. everything yall say about pj can easily be applied to taylor heineke. difference is, rivera allowed heineke to develop, make his mistakes and learn. rivera never put heineke in at the last minute and force him to play hero ball. and they both played for the XFL, not for nothing. and now, heineke is going to the playoffs. and before you say heineke is better than pj, he's not. pj has a much stronger arm. this organization is impatient, and they don't want to 

Ron. He should be a college headcoach. When you come to the Nfl you should be good. I don't consider developing a qb in the NFL. Qbs have to adjust. I wouldn't want a qb that I would have to develope bc it seems that you would loose ground.  If you need to develop then you need to have a good veteran in place. Most teams don't.  The qb needs to be able to adjust or be special enough to still be able to win learning on the fly. Thing about that though most are not going to change much. The saying if it ain't  broke don't fix it , comes to mind.

Ron will not sniff another SB bc he doesn't  want greatness. He proved it when he was here. Just look how teams would come back and beat us. He is a poor man's Arians!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tinamedina said:

 

it doesn't matter how heineke got there, hes there now. you and a lot of nfl fans have this puritan status quo mentality that says, a qb has to have this college background, and drafted this high or hes no good. that mentality no longer works in todays nfl. there are several situations similar to this that have people wondering if the first round pick even matters anymore. i dont think it does. 

It's not so much as draft position Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers proved that.. I think it goes into work ethic and what you produced on the field. What type of offense you played in and arm strength. The team you go to has to match your skill set. Coaching plays a big part in getting young QBs adjusted to the NFL life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mav1234 said:

I agree with everything you're saying but I don't think we can bank on PJ being anything.  Not saying cut him etc... He's the best option at backup atm. I don't blame him (hell, or Darnold) for not being better, I blame the coaches. 

That doesn't make PJ better than particular other players like heineke right this second tho.  Frankly I hope a new offensive staff can come in and evaluate all our QBs in the offseason.  Maybe they can make something of PJ as a backup who knows.

I have never advocated banking anything on PJ.  I mean I joke about him not losing.   But he is just a backup QB.  And in his two starts he frankly has done his job pretty well.   

people bitch about PJ so hard because we have done such a pathetic job in front of PJ.   

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Tinamedina said:

 

a win is a win. and he clearly is a prime example of people not properly evaluating qbs. cause he was cut in favor of other guys and where are they? exactly.

You're talking out of both sides of your mouth in this thread and not making any sense.  You know the Rivera/Hurney juggernaut cut Heinicke from the Panthers in 2019 right?  That should make them bad at evaluating QBs according to your own criteria.  Yet you're praising them and saying they should be emulated for "developing" him in ways we haven't developed PJ Walker, even though Walker has been on the Panthers roughly twice as long as Heinicke has been with WFT.  As others have pointed out Heinicke was on the bench behind Ryan Fitzpatrick to start the season anyway.  If everything had gone to plan he would have never seen the field. 

If this is such a winning formula we should just sign random FA quarterbacks and "develop" them I suppose.  Why would this apply to PJ Walker and not, oh I don't know, Will Grier or some other rando?  poo what's Tony Pike been up to?

The Patriots cut Heinicke too and I'd wager they're kind of okay at evaluating QBs.  Bet Heinicke would have cost less draft capital and been on a cheaper contract than first round pick Mac Jones.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...