Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quick note, re: coaching


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

By his own words, Rhule's philosophy boils down to "run the ball and play defense".

Basically, he's no different than the coaches we had under Richardson.

Only difference is that this guy takes the blah to a whole nother layer of suck. 

He's worse than either coach. At least with them we had a couple good years and there was some positive traction early. 

Rhule has absolutely nothing going for him.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

Only difference is that this guy takes the blah to a whole nother layer of suck. 

He's worse than either coach. At least with them we had a couple good years and there was some positive traction early. 

Rhule has absolutely nothing going for him.

Much as I dislike hyperbole, there's an argument to be made that Rhule might be our worst head coach.

Closest competition would be Seifert.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Much as I dislike hyperbole, there's an argument to be made that Rhule might be our worst head coach.

Closest competition would be Seifert.

I was just thinking that. It would be hard to choose who was worse between those two. 

The record doesn't tell the whole story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

By his own words, Rhule's philosophy boils down to "run the ball and play defense".

Basically, he's no different than the coaches we had under Richardson.

Such a mess, how many games have we abandoned the run? I think we ran 15 times yesterday. So the philosophy has been more like "Throw picks to guys sitting on routes they learned watching film, and get ran over by average RB's"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I was just thinking that. It would be hard to choose who was worse between those two. 

The record doesn't tell the whole story.

Still wonder how this year's record is gonna wind up.

It's hard to picture us being competitive with the Bucs or the Bills. Atlanta maybe depending on how we're trending, and the Saints have named Taysom Hill their starting QB so there's that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to see you back @Mr. Scot. Sorry to hear things are not going well at home.  You are the best poster on this board my friend no matter what the mouth breathers would have anyone believe. As one of the elders here I personally would hate to see you leave this place for something other than family.  May good fortune shine upon you in these troubled times my friend. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Still wonder how this year's record is gonna wind up.

It's hard to picture us being competitive with the Bucs or the Bills. Atlanta maybe depending on how we're trending, and the Saints have named Taysom Hill their starting QB so there's that.

It appears to me that the young prodigy has had his offense figured out.  I would say the odds are good they will not be competitive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Still wonder how this year's record is gonna wind up.

It's hard to picture us being competitive with the Bucs or the Bills. Atlanta maybe depending on how we're trending, and the Saints have named Taysom Hill their starting QB so there's that.

We did get beat by Joe Judge and the New York football "Giants" backups' backups so nothing is out of the question.

Edited by therealmjl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rayzor said:

I was just thinking that. It would be hard to choose who was worse between those two. 

The record doesn't tell the whole story.

Rhule is worse than Seifert. At least Seifert had success in the NFL prior to the Panthers and was a Super Bowl winning coach. Plus he did gift us Morgan, Jenkins and #89. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Rocky Davis said:

I think Pederson would be a really good hire.  He's been there before, has plenty of knowledge about who he could bring in as NFL coaches and I think with a good DC hire he could turn this wreck around with Fitterer and Morgan.  He's an offensive guy so he'll make fixing that O-line priority #1.

I’m a big fan of hiring BBQ Dad as offensive coordinator and hiring Matt Eberflus as head coach.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...