Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Points for and against ranks, adjusted for opponents


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Points for and against can sometimes be a bit misleading depending on who is on your schedule.  For example, holding KC to 25 points is a good day whereas allowing Detroit to score 25 would be bad.

This graph accounts for your opponents.

Basically, we have the 7th (maybe 6th, in line with KC) best defense and 7th worst offense according to the chart.

 

Snow's defense might actually help save Rhule's job.  Tepper might buy the idea that if Rhule changes the offense that the team could turn around quickly.

Add in the fact that we are one of the youngest defenses in the league.

 

 

Edited by AU-panther
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Points for and against can sometimes be a bit misleading depending on who is on your schedule.  For example, holding KC to 25 points is a good day whereas allowing Detroit to score 25 would be bad.

This graph accounts for your opponents.

Basically, we have the 7th (maybe 6th, in line with KC) best defense and 7th worst offense according to the chart.

 

Snow's defense might actually help save Rhule's job.  Tepper might buy the idea that if Rhule changes the offense that the team could turn around quickly.

Add in the fact that we are one of the youngest defenses in the league.

 

 

If Tepper buys anything Rhule is selling, I have no idea how he became a hedge fund billionaire. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Curious how this chart looks at the end of the season. While we might have the 6th or 7th best defense as of today, it’s not a great sign that we’ve been strafed by two below average offenses on both the ground and thru the air over the past two weeks. 

I think the team is starting to lay down. We will see in two weeks. If they get smashed after a bye week, it's over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They know within 15 mins.  Many moons ago skins drafted Heath Shuler at like 5th overall and Gus Frerotte in the late rounds. You know the plan, its Heaths team. Old OLman stink said within 15 minutes they knew Gus was the better QB.  I didn't need 15 or players on the same field, I just knew like Bill said "he better walk on water", which he hasn't. I do blame tepper mainly for it, he spend the greater part of 2 year telling everyone Watson would be a panther......and fail....but a great fail...then Stanford turned panthers down.....tepper was beyond pissed and wanted a QB. He forced the trade and picked BY......and now by .....some grace of the gods formed a team with 4 QBs of no hope...... insane given the other roster spots.....
    • He definitely knows nothing about the Panthers, but there’s no denying he’s a pioneer in this whole draft grading and mock draft field.
    • I actually say wait five years since that's long enough to know if a player  became something worthy enough for a long term contract, whether with their original team or someone else. Therefore... 1 (8): Jaycee Horn - Has been questions about his durability but when he's healthy, he plays at a high level. Should we have drafted Pat Surtain or Micah Parsons, however? Arguably could’ve done better, but he's still here so that's a W pick. 2 (59): Terrance Marshall - Yet another classic Panther WR bust. I don’t recall seeing anything in his college tape that made me excited about drafting him in the first place.  3 (70): Brady Christensen - Proved to be a versatile player on the O-line.  As of now, we haven’t signed him back and I feel that we should. That's enough to say he was a solid draft pick. 3 (83): Tommy Tremble - Hasn't emerged as a consistent productive player, but he's had his moments here and there. We can certainly do better, but we haven’t found that guy yet so he still has some utility. W because he's not Ian Thomas. 4 (126): Chuba Hubbard - Surprise of the draft. It took time, but he's now our lead back.  5 (158): Daviyon Nixon - Had a half a sack with us and... that's it. I think I liked what I saw but it didn't pan out. 5 (166): Keith Taylor - Another guy I liked but only stuck around for two years. Played for a few other teams but nothing really to note. 6 (193): Deonte Brown - I really thought this guy was going to be a steal. He might’ve been the guy that had weight issues and never really got a handle on it. 6 (204): Shi Smith - He scored double the touchdowns that Marshall did in his short time here; it was two. Yeah, the Panthers wide receiver history is rather bleak. 6 (222): Thomas Fletcher - I had to look it up but he was a long snapper. JJ Jansen is immortal, so it was a wasted draft pick. 7 (232): Phil Hoskins - Actually recorded a sack here in his short career. Wish I could remember it.   Surprisingly not a bad draft when you have two good/great starters and a JAG that's still here, plus a good rotation guy most would like to keep. 
×
×
  • Create New...