Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Perryman to the pro bowl


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mvp2014 said:

players and draft capital are the only currency here.  

If he wasnt practicing and was likely to be cut its a free pick

So what do you get for the 2M(and a 7th rounder) you spent on him? A 6th round pick. There’s nothing “free” about it. You believe teams would give up 2M to move from the 7th to the 6th round? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Jared Patterson said:

Just like the Butker thing though and Christenson not starting. Its just pure incompetence in evaluating.... he is still much better than Carter and we had him on a super cheap two year contract. We lose Carter next year and will have to pay someone more who will likely not be as good now.

It honestly sounded like he never meshed with the staff so good for him to get out.

The evaluation part doesn't hurt anymore, I'm numb at this point to their subpar evaluations. It offers more to the case of damaging incompetence that is this staff and why they should be fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Bc we were going to cut him, but instead flipped him for a pick….. we signed a FA and traded him immediately and has zero impact on our cap the year we use the draft pick.

 

it’s really not that hard to figure out.

Since it’s 1M this year, and 1M next year, how doesn’t it effect any year with the pick? And that doesn’t change that the 2M is gone. For a bump from a 7th to a 6th. 
 

  It’s easy to figure out if you’re not looking for an excuse for a mistake. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Since it’s 1M this year, and 1M next year, how doesn’t it effect any year with the pick? And that doesn’t change that the 2M is gone. For a bump from a 7th to a 6th. 
 

  It’s easy to figure out if you’re not looking for an excuse for a mistake. 

that’s your perspective man. I don’t agree with you, but I’ll respect it. So let’s just leave it at that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...