Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

After today, everyone should understand you need a QB


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Rhule developing a QB to fit in the NFL is way above his head. Just draft an o-linemen that's ready to be plugged in. Get a QB first overall in 2023 with a new coach.

This is truly the only answer.   You guys A)really want rhule to draft a qb?  B)Really want Rhule to develop a QB?  C)You really want a rookie qb behind this line?  and more importantly D)Do you really want to give Rhule any chance to slightly look good with a rookie so he can plead for more time to Tepper?

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Here is where our philosophies probably differ.  I dont think scouts get it wrong per se, I think its all about the situation.  Drop just about any qb into a poo situation and they are going to suck.  How many jet qb failures do you have to see to say hey maybe its the franchise not the player.  There is no way Fields is as bad as he looked this year IMO.  It was a poo show of a coaching staff.   I know its not feasible to every team but the way KC did with pat is picture perfect.  Build the line, have a great mentor teaching and a great coachign staff and simply let him sit to ease the pressure off.

 

What would mahoomes look like starting his rookie year on a team like the jets?

KC and Mahomes is a terrible example.  Everyone wants to wait for a better QB class but Mahomes was in a terrible QB class.

Trubisky was the first QB off the board, think about that.

If anythign drafting Mahomes would be more like a team falling in love with a QB this year and taking a chance.

Having a good team helps Mahomes but it doesn't change the fact that KC took a chance on a QB.  Do you honestly think Darnold would be just as successful as Mahomes if he was drafted by KC?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I see your point but having a cannon isnt the end all be all.  We all remember the video of Russell throwing the ball from teh 50 on his knees

I absolutely agree. Go back and read through my posts here. I'm not trying to argue that you have to have a QBwith a cannon arm. I'm simply saying that these folks looking for this QB prospect who checks every single box are looking for the type of guy who comes along about once a decade. What's your odds of ending up #1 overall in that particular draft class?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Medicals was his only real concern.  Talent and production was not questioned by anyone. Stop being petty.

That's a HUGE concern though. Especially coming off an injury that may lead to never getting back to 100%.

I'm not bring petty. You're being unrealistic and extraordinarily revisionist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AU-panther said:

KC and Mahomes is a terrible example.  Everyone wants to wait for a better QB class but Mahomes was in a terrible QB class.

Trubisky was the first QB off the board, think about that.

If anythign drafting Mahomes would be more like a team falling in love with a QB this year and taking a chance.

Having a good team helps Mahomes but it doesn't change the fact that KC took a chance on a QB.  Do you honestly think Darnold would be just as successful as Mahomes if he was drafted by KC?

 

 

The bears were universally mocked for moving up for Mitch.  I will try and find the article where the niners were openly laughing at that pick

 

Watson and mahomes were good prospects with insane physical skills

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BrianS said:

You're asking the wrong questions.

What you, me or anyone on here believes about any of these QB prospects is completely and utterly irrelevant.  All that matters is what our scouts think, and then, assuming the organization is structured and run in a responsible way, our front office acting on those opinions.

If our scouts look at ANY of these QB prospects and say "This is a franchise QB", it would be irresponsible in the extreme to not draft that guy.  Even the best scouts and evaluators are wrong regarding QB prospects half the time.  Who are we as fans to think we know better?  It's a coin flip man.

Wrong, you draft the best players, period. If at #6 there is a player rated higher than your top QB, you take that player.  Believe me there absolutely will be. QB desperation on this board reeks of a geek hanging out after school to watch cheerleading practice from the bleachers by himself.  It's just sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Yes you can.

 

what that there below is data.  A trend even.  We are going to suck monkey balls next season as long as sam is the qb and rhule is the coach

 

Rhules first 2 draft picks:  Pick 8.  Pick 6

Sam Darnold first 4 seasons:  Pick 3. Pick 11.  Pick 2. Pick 6

 

Even pick 6 doesn't get you the "can't miss QB".  This past draft you would have got QB4.

You can't compare Trevor and Wilson vs this year's class because they were not available for us.

Lets say we can pick QB1 this year, that means this year vs last year actually looks like:

Fields and Jones vs Howell, Corral, Picket, Willis.

All of sudden the classes don't seem that much different.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tua aside, the media reviled Justin Herbert after he regressed to the mean his final season at Oregon, as did most of this board. 
 

trying to paint that class as being labeled “can’t miss” is verifiably false

theres a single “can’t miss” prospect in a draft about once a decade or so and people here actually believe you should wait for him and hope to luck into the 1st overall pick

”prepare the roster”

at some point you have to realize that either your methodology is bad or your ability to evaluate the position is

Edited by Growl
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Wrong, you draft the best players, period. If at #6 there is a player rated higher than your top QB, you take that player.  Believe me there absolutely will be. QB desperation on this board reeks of a geek hanging out after school to watch cheerleading practice from the bleachers by himself.  It's just sad.

Yeah, I'd take a 1st team All-Pro OG over a 2nd team All-Pro QB. 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Growl said:

Far preferable to try and miss than to watch one of these guys inevitably go elsewhere and turn into playoff mainstays.

there are worse things in the world than a “bust.”

I get it. I wanted fields or move up for Lance this past year. 
 

I just don’t trust this staff to pick the right guy is all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Wrong, you draft the best players, period. If at #6 there is a player rated higher than your top QB, you take that player.  Believe me there absolutely will be. QB desperation on this board reeks of a geek hanging out after school to watch cheerleading practice from the bleachers by himself.  It's just sad.

Wrong

How often is a QB really the best player available?  Unless you have the #1 pick in a generational year (Luck, Manning, Lawrance) a non-QB will almost always be rated higher.

Chase Young probably had a higher grade than Burrow.  

QBs are in a different league based on improtance, you can't compare them to non-QBs.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Even pick 6 doesn't get you the "can't miss QB".  This past draft you would have got QB4.

You can't compare Trevor and Wilson vs this year's class because they were not available for us.

Lets say we can pick QB1 this year, that means this year vs last year actually looks like:

Fields and Jones vs Howell, Corral, Picket, Willis.

All of sudden the classes don't seem that much different.

 

 

Pick 6 makes its crazy easy to move up to where you need to go.  You will still need to give whatever team a boatload but being at 6 makes it easier to move to pick 2 or even 1 if the situation is right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, frankw said:

This 5 win crap only guarantees that we prolong QB purgatory. Just get it over with and have the worst record in 2022 like we should have done the last three years. Take the best quarterback available and pray he's the one.

I agree. Keep picking QBs till you find the guy. I doubt the Cards are losing sleep cause they picked QB in the first round in consecutive years with Rosen then Murray.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...