Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Landon Johnson to IR according to Gantt


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

OK NOW we need to bring Leman back!

he's on the Chargers practice squad so if they want him it shouldn't be too tough to sign him, but I'm sure they'll get some other guy weve never heard of and he'll spend the rest of the season trying to learn the play book

Leman was playing at a pete level in the preseason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should try peppers as a olb. He wanted to have a chance to play lb in the offseason, why not give him a shot there, have Johnson or Brown come in while pep is playing lb.

Ahaha. Can you IMAGINE a 6'8" monster playing OLB in a 4-3? I mean, he has the speed to play, but does he have the coverage skills?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we should go with 2 LBs in the middle of the field now and go with 5 DL (letting pep float around) or 5 DBs (wesley in the joker role).

landon johnson was a huge mistake and giant bust.

he's getting paid $1 million (+ $1 million "signing bonus"), this year and $2.595 million next year. hopefully we give him an injury settlement.

we've gotten 36 total tackles (30 solo) from this clown who is 2 years into a 3 year, $10 mil contract. we have to get out of this contract somehow. total waste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...