Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are people really STILL defending the decision to stick with Jake going into '09?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

There has been an epidemic of stupid posters over the past few days that have, for whatever reason, gone back to defending the decision by John Fox and Marty Hurney to not bring any other quarterback in here over the last few seasons. Since Jake's first really bad season in 2006, we've had a plethora of great quarterbacks available that we passed on from MVP candidate Brett Favre to young quarterbacks that have a very bright future like Chad Henne and Joe Flacco.

Am I missing something? Where is all this coming from suddenly? Is Charlie Dayton paying what few non-laid off workers remain in the Panthers' tech department to post here this week?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has been an epidemic of stupid posters over the past few days that have, for whatever reason, gone back to defending the decision by John Fox and Marty Hurney to not bring any other quarterback in here over the last few seasons. Since Jake's first really bad season in 2006, we've had a plethora of great quarterbacks available that we passed on from MVP candidate Brett Favre to young quarterbacks that have a very bright future like Chad Henne and Joe Flacco.

Am I missing something? Where is all this coming from suddenly? Is Charlie Dayton paying what few non-laid off workers remain in the Panthers' tech department to post here this week?

In Foxys defense, he did try and bring in Carr which we all thought was a freakin steal at the time. They'r prolly gunshy after that debacle or they have ADD and just said fk it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jake is the best QB currently on the Panthers' roster, IMO... therefore, he should get the nod over everyone else.

as for the future? i doubt anyone who's actually watched a Panthers game this year truly supports keeping him in anything other than a backup role.

lastly... do you have a personal beef with delhomme, SMF? For every dumb thread by some douche with three posts about how good delhomme is, you have two threads screaming about how awful delhomme (or fox) (or davidson) is. are you rodney peete in disguise? are you still bitter about being benched in '03? there HAS to be something else going on here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jake Delhomme 17

I know, right?

I hate that he's asking our quarterback to throw the ball.

yes its jeff davidson's crappy play calling for instant we had 1st & goal at the 8 aginst miami and he calls 3 passing plays. Its retarded calling like that pisses me off he should balance its out more and we be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that a lot of people are defending Fox and Hurney for not having a viable option. Its more that a lot of people are coming to realize what the actual situation was and what our options were.

The Delhomme extension was not a great idea but there wasn't any cap space without it because Pep had us strapped to the table. As far as bringing in other QB's they brought in Carr, which everyone loved but he was forced to play too soon and it didn't work. They have brought in McCown, who I think would be a good QB for what this team wants to do. Which is keeping a D honest and only asking a QB to win in the last 2 mins if he has to. They had Moore in the stable, I don't think that the staff was or is too high on him but he is a good 3rd string QB.

As far as drafting a QB goes, the team believes in BPA draft strategy. Especially after the first round. Sometimes that leaves us as fans scratching our heads and the team wanting in some positions. I also don't think that they are too worried about drafting a QB because of the type of QB that they are looking for. More of a game manager, just someone good enough to keep the D honest. It is usually easier and cheaper to find that guy in FA than in the draft.

The thing that I am most upset about is how quickly they pulled the trigger on putting McCown on IR. That was a panic move that I am sure they wish they could take back. As far as sticking with Delhomme for this year, he was more expensive to cut this year than to restructure and there were not a lot of FA options and the draft was not a deep draft for QB's.

It was a gross miscalculation by the FO and Fox on Delhomme's ability. However in all reality, with our cap situation the last few years there was not a lot to be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Zavala was really bad his first year but I think he can still flash that unfortunately. Coaching? IDK. Inconvenience seems to be common.  Moton should just have played the year out to see what's what or they should have replaced him, whixh is a tall order for a team with so much else needing done. I just thought the reworked deal was dumb. Get cap but create another issue later. Just eat it and move on. I do think they were trying to create space for someone else but that's also a huge negative for me because the 'one player away mentality' has always been a failure that I can remember. Corbett was a known health issue, a waste of roster space really. BC has had a fractured ankle and a torn bicep so he isn't a huge shocker either, unlucky or injury prone at this point? Add in Moton and that unit was always suspect. Having both high priced OGs dealing with injuries 1 year removed from their big deals just seems like the chefs kiss to that entire build. So 2 known injury issues with starters, a backup that's probably injury prone now, Mays and then nobodies. I don't think I can call that decent depth, especially considering the 2 known starter issues coming into the year.
    • Just imagine how great it will be when they eventually expand the playoff to 24 teams, or more. There will still only be 3 or 4 teams that have a real chance of winning the national championship, but the money-making opportunity will be too irresistible.
    • Trading Hubbard should be a decision made based on the "future" of the team. If they deem Rico a wiser investment, long term, Hubbard is expendable. If they deem Hubbard the wiser investment, long term, Rico is expendable. That doesn't mean they should have a price that is less than acceptable, however.
×
×
  • Create New...