Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are people really STILL defending the decision to stick with Jake going into '09?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

There has been an epidemic of stupid posters over the past few days that have, for whatever reason, gone back to defending the decision by John Fox and Marty Hurney to not bring any other quarterback in here over the last few seasons. Since Jake's first really bad season in 2006, we've had a plethora of great quarterbacks available that we passed on from MVP candidate Brett Favre to young quarterbacks that have a very bright future like Chad Henne and Joe Flacco.

Am I missing something? Where is all this coming from suddenly? Is Charlie Dayton paying what few non-laid off workers remain in the Panthers' tech department to post here this week?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has been an epidemic of stupid posters over the past few days that have, for whatever reason, gone back to defending the decision by John Fox and Marty Hurney to not bring any other quarterback in here over the last few seasons. Since Jake's first really bad season in 2006, we've had a plethora of great quarterbacks available that we passed on from MVP candidate Brett Favre to young quarterbacks that have a very bright future like Chad Henne and Joe Flacco.

Am I missing something? Where is all this coming from suddenly? Is Charlie Dayton paying what few non-laid off workers remain in the Panthers' tech department to post here this week?

In Foxys defense, he did try and bring in Carr which we all thought was a freakin steal at the time. They'r prolly gunshy after that debacle or they have ADD and just said fk it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jake is the best QB currently on the Panthers' roster, IMO... therefore, he should get the nod over everyone else.

as for the future? i doubt anyone who's actually watched a Panthers game this year truly supports keeping him in anything other than a backup role.

lastly... do you have a personal beef with delhomme, SMF? For every dumb thread by some douche with three posts about how good delhomme is, you have two threads screaming about how awful delhomme (or fox) (or davidson) is. are you rodney peete in disguise? are you still bitter about being benched in '03? there HAS to be something else going on here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jake Delhomme 17

I know, right?

I hate that he's asking our quarterback to throw the ball.

yes its jeff davidson's crappy play calling for instant we had 1st & goal at the 8 aginst miami and he calls 3 passing plays. Its retarded calling like that pisses me off he should balance its out more and we be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that a lot of people are defending Fox and Hurney for not having a viable option. Its more that a lot of people are coming to realize what the actual situation was and what our options were.

The Delhomme extension was not a great idea but there wasn't any cap space without it because Pep had us strapped to the table. As far as bringing in other QB's they brought in Carr, which everyone loved but he was forced to play too soon and it didn't work. They have brought in McCown, who I think would be a good QB for what this team wants to do. Which is keeping a D honest and only asking a QB to win in the last 2 mins if he has to. They had Moore in the stable, I don't think that the staff was or is too high on him but he is a good 3rd string QB.

As far as drafting a QB goes, the team believes in BPA draft strategy. Especially after the first round. Sometimes that leaves us as fans scratching our heads and the team wanting in some positions. I also don't think that they are too worried about drafting a QB because of the type of QB that they are looking for. More of a game manager, just someone good enough to keep the D honest. It is usually easier and cheaper to find that guy in FA than in the draft.

The thing that I am most upset about is how quickly they pulled the trigger on putting McCown on IR. That was a panic move that I am sure they wish they could take back. As far as sticking with Delhomme for this year, he was more expensive to cut this year than to restructure and there were not a lot of FA options and the draft was not a deep draft for QB's.

It was a gross miscalculation by the FO and Fox on Delhomme's ability. However in all reality, with our cap situation the last few years there was not a lot to be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Passer Rating Differential = Offensive Passer Rating  - Defensive Passer Rating    Offensive Passer Rating = how efficient your team’s QBs are. Defensive Passer Rating Allowed = how efficient opposing QBs are against your defense. The larger the positive differential, the more dominant your team’s passing game is relative to opponents’ passing success. Conversely, a negative differential means your defense is getting carved up or your offense isn’t efficient enough. Almost every Super Bowl champion from the 1970s to the present day finished near the top of the league in DPRD (Defensive Passer Rating Differential). https://coldhardfootballfacts.com/stats/passer-ratings-differential Look at where we are #16 and we have a Negative DPRD (-0.36). Every team above us has a a positive DPRD, is .500 or better, and still in running for a playoff spot.  Look at the chart. The best teams in the NFL have the highest DPRD. Only 2 teams below us with a negative DPRD are still in contention or the playoffs: #19 San Francisco (-4.44) and # 21 Tampa Bay(-6.62). And, Tampa has no shot if they fail to beat us down the stretch at least once. The teams with the highest negative DPRD always seem to be at the bottom of the standings. I didn't learn about this stat until 15 years ago. It's amazing how it always seems to accurately predict who will be in playoff contention year end and year out. 1 = Los Angeles Rams 111.76 85.23 26.53 2 3 Philadelphia Eagles 100.00 75.57 24.43 3 1 Seattle Seahawks 100.30 77.42 22.88 4 1 Buffalo Bills 104.20 82.66 21.54 5 1 Los Angeles Chargers 91.46 71.19 20.27 6 1 Houston Texans 90.70 72.40 18.30 7 1 Detroit Lions 110.41 94.40 16.01 8 1 New England Patriots 109.10 96.75 12.35 9 3 Green Bay Packers 102.95 92.09 10.86 10 1 Denver Broncos 89.21 78.78 10.43 11 1 Indianapolis Colts 95.12 85.91 9.21 12 = Pittsburgh Steelers 97.42 89.90 7.52 13 = Baltimore Ravens 93.87 86.91 6.96 14 2 Jacksonville Jaguars 88.07 81.23 6.84 15 4 Chicago Bears 89.48 88.70 0.78 16 2 Carolina Panthers 88.77 89.13 -0.36 17 2 Arizona Cardinals 93.49 95.79 -2.30 18 1 Kansas City Chiefs 88.85 92.46 -3.61 19 1 San Francisco 49ers 96.87 101.31 -4.44 20 1 Atlanta Falcons 87.50 92.50 -5.00 21 3 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 89.77 96.39 -6.62 22 = Dallas Cowboys 98.69 108.92 -10.23 23 = New York Giants 87.74 98.84 -11.10 24 1 New Orleans Saints 84.97 96.17 -11.20 25 1 Miami Dolphins 88.33 102.37 -14.04 26 3 Minnesota Vikings 75.03 90.31 -15.28 27 3 Las Vegas Raiders 83.50 99.14 -15.64 28 = Cincinnati Bengals 84.51 104.46 -19.95 29 2 Washington Commanders 87.24 107.74 -20.50 30 3 Cleveland Browns 70.46 91.41 -20.95 31 1 New York Jets 77.75 104.86 -27.11 32 = Tennessee Titans 76.27 106.03 -29.76  
    • Yeah and truthfully I’ll be ok with that as long as the talent and culture is building. 
    • We have been on the right side of one score games.  But like minny a few years ago and KC, we know that isnt sustainable and we probably will revert back to the nfl mean.  Which could mean a poo season incoming if this offense doesnt figure poo out
×
×
  • Create New...