Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mock Draft Simulator Thread 2022


Jay Roosevelt
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

My ideal scenario is we can trade back a few spots, and pick up an early second.  Pick up Cross/Ickey/Neal in first and best available QB in 2 (probably Howell or Coral).  After seeing some of the mocks here it looks like others are seeing the same thing. 

 

Probably unlikely it works out that way but one can hope.

It feels like the prospective bang-for-buck for the QBs is highest on those two. I would rather have either in the second than anyone else anywhere in the first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

image.thumb.png.211c17b571ecf2fb12af72f1686f91e2.png

Get the LT!

See if Howell is Baker sans the baggage, would not be afraid to draft an additional QB in 2023

Best Edge rusher available, situational, but worth a flyer considering our history of 3rd round picks

Clark is a stash for next year.  He has borderline first round talent.

Ezeudu is guard depth or can challenge BC for LG.

Ferguson is a Dalton Shultz/Dawson Knox type.

Weatherford has the mesurables to become a LB if he struggles at SS.  Worst case, with his measurements and athletic ability he could be a core ST guy.

Williams was a great deal, not likely to be around that late in the draft.

Didn't even realize that I traded with Atlanta twice.  LIkely would never happen, but who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I generally disagree with the concept of picking a position because of value early in the draft. For instance, if there's a really good safety, RB or ILB at pick 10, I'm choosing him over a project WR or DE. Better players make the team better. A bunch of ok players will give you an ok team. The number 1 goal of the draft should be to improve the overall talent on the team. Not to fill positions of need.  Deciding beforehand that you're picking a LT in the first or second round because Ickey went down is not the way to improve the team. Now if Dan has similar grades on 2 or 3 players and one happens to be a LT, then yeah go for it. But don't pass on your guy at ILB because you have a gap at LT or need to improve the pass rush with a DE. When those guys don't pan out then you haven't improved your team. But that LB could have been a franchise cornerstone for years to come. See Luke Kuechly and Christian McCaffrey. 
    • Thank God we are inthe NFC South--
    • When Sanders was named as an alternate, I was all like, "That's a big ol bowl of NOPE."   In my view, they would be better off showing a documentary on the 32 "man of the year" candidates to show what they do for charities etc.  
×
×
  • Create New...