Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just throwing this out there..

WOW!!

By WOW!!,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, WOW!! said:

We also watch that team barely beat a Titans and Raiders team with better Olines.. 

We also saw a San Francisco team with the worst QB in the Playoffs beat the best QB and best WR in the league at their house..

 

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

this is super old. RT are just as important as LT now in the league. Teams used to spend a lot of money on focusing on rushing the passer's blind side. Now it goes both ways. 

You have an argument, but your argument is a bit dated.

There is a story by Chris Trapaso under it as well did you read that..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

We also watch that team barely beat a Titans and Raiders team with better Olines.. 

We also saw a San Francisco team with the worst QB in the Playoffs beat the best QB and best WR in the league at their house..

“this team lost but they maybe could’ve won”

like lol what kind of argument is that

glad you mentioned the niners, the niners just traded away years worth of plug and play 1st round hog mollies because they knew they didn’t have an elite QB

the QB they did have cost them a super bowl

now they’re getting rid of him

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Growl said:

“this team lost but they maybe could’ve won”

like lol what kind of argument is that

glad you mentioned the niners, the niners just traded away years worth of plug and play 1st round hog mollies because they knew they didn’t have an elite QB

the QB they did have cost them a super bowl

now they’re getting rid of him

 

Yes they traded for a higher rated prospect more of a sure thing ..

You want to take a swing a lower level prospect based on desperation and position value.. Okay

But your taking a swing on prospect rated on the same level as the QB San Francisco is trying to get rid of...

Think about that..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

Definitely don’t think Love is a bust at this point. He’s been playing behind a 1st ballot HOFer who just isn’t ready to go elsewhere yet. Who knows…if he has an entire season to play maybe he puts together a good career. Problem is that at thus point he’s gonna go somewhere else to do it and so he’ll be learning all over again. 
 

BUT! He’s 6 mo younger than Pickett and has already been in the league three years. To me he’s further ahead of Pickett, has more natural arm talent, and would cost less. So to me if you’re not going to draft Corral bc of superior physical traits to Pickett (in a move down) then trading a mid round pick for Love isn’t the worst idea. 

Yup.  He was a first round pick by Green Bay, who happen to know a thing or 2 about picking good QBs, for a reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Yes they traded for a higher rated prospect more of a sure thing ..

You want to take a swing a lower level prospect based on desperation and position value.. Okay

But your taking a swing on prospect rated on the same level as the QB San Francisco is trying to get rid of...

Think about that..

Lol trey Lance was a sure thing? Trey Lance was an FCS QB who didn’t even play his final season. that’s about as opposite a sure thing as you can possibly be.

they traded three 1’s to get him. 

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, TheCasillas said:

I know, that is why I said it was dated. The article is from 2013. That was almost a decade ago, and the league has changed quite a bit, along with positional value.

Okay either way .. let's go by your position value now... Is it smart to take a lower prospect at a higher positional rate or a generational talent at a lower positional rate??

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
Just now, WOW!! said:

Okay either way .. let's go by your position value now... Is it smart to take a lower prospect at a higher positional rate or a generational talent at a lower positional rate??

I dont think there is a blanket answer there. Its competely situational. Cowboys have been drafting "generational" 1st round talent for years... and it really hasnt done them much other than eat cap space.

Hurney drafted BPA while he was here, and that didnt turn into anything.

Bills and Patriots always draft postion of need but they have different results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Growl said:

Lol trey Lance was a sure thing? Trey Lance was an FCS QB who didn’t even play his final season. that’s about as opposite a sure thing as you can possibly be.

they traded three 1’s to get him. 

Trey Lance by far would be the number 1 no question 1st pick in this draft... Him being in this draft alone would raise the positional rating of the QBS in this draft.. 

His physical talent alone makes every QB in this draft look like Chris ponder or Joey Harrington..

You can act like any QB in this draft is even close to the prospect Lance is but it wouldn't be true..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Trey Lance by far would be the number 1 no question 1st pick in this draft... Him being in this draft alone would raise the positional rating of the QBS in this draft.. 

His physical talent alone makes every QB in this draft look like Chris ponder or Joey Harrington..

You can act like any QB in this draft is even close to the prospect Lance is but it wouldn't be true..

Why don’t you do an in depth breakdown of trey Lance the prospect for me then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Growl said:

Lol trey Lance was a sure thing? Trey Lance was an FCS QB who didn’t even play his final season. that’s about as opposite a sure thing as you can possibly be.

they traded three 1’s to get him. 

And there's a lot of talk but he's still not ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • raleigh-panther
      89 on The Pivot

      By raleigh-panther · Posted

      I am really sorry  that  happened to you they say to never meet your sports heroes i have friends who met  mickey mantle when they were young and he was a belligerent alcoholic at the time  ut broke their hearts  I had the opportunity to meet and spend  time with Cam Newton.     He was the polar opposite of Steve Smith and his public image.   Polite.  Honest when asked question.  You could tell the things that mattered to him and the things that  didnt. The disappointments in himself and the things that hurt him  those qualities make him quite a good interviewer too  i genuinely liked him   Im sure as young, rich, sports hero, he has not been a choir boy but there is goodness in him  the time i met him i took one of my friends with me from the west coast. She said she didn't like him and wasn’t enthusiastic about meeting him.  She left loving him   No one can say anything bad about ‘her Cam’ anymore 
    • Navy_football
      So, after Sunday's game does that mean we're stuck with Bryce for the foreseeable future?

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Agree about oline. They've tried their best to improve that area. But honestly, has it looked like the most expensive oline in the NFL to you? Not just with Bryce. With Dalton's one game where they almost got the old man killed.  Also YAC shouldn't always be hitting a guy in stride while he's running full speed. Pickens killed us after the catch and those weren't all hit-in-stride plays. I remember a play in Miami when a guy caught a 5 yards curl and took it like 30-40 yards to the house. We don't have that in Carolina. Horn might be the closest thing to that but he can't get significant PT for whatever reason. If Bryce keeps trusting his receivers to make plays, I think he'll become more consistent. Seemed like he only trusted TMac. And force feeding one receiver isn't sustainable. Defenses will start to blanket him and take him out of the game. And yeah, keep taking deep shots. I hate all that dink and dunk football. Hate it. 
    • LinvilleGorge
      So, after Sunday's game does that mean we're stuck with Bryce for the foreseeable future?

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dan Marino sucked too I guess. Washed up Elway carried by Terrell Davis was actually better than prine Elway. Lol
×
×
  • Create New...