Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer best draft day trader per PFF


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, kungfoodude said:

I wasn't ready to ride with him last season but at this point I would rather we take our medicine, get rid of this shitty coach and not hamstring the future of our franchise based on this dumbasses decisions. 

Worst case scenario, we end up with another top 10 pick.

I am secretly hoping we do anyway. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I mean it is cute that most of these players played but very few made significant impacts. 

We passed up on impact, day one starters for projects or luxury picks. That was our 2021 draft. 

If you see an opportunity to get a QB in this draft, I mean....God bless is all I have to say. I suppose there are improvements over Darnold and Walker but if that is the bar, we could have accomplished that in the first day of free agency. 

At this point, I think you're just being cynical to be cynical. Every move that has been made and will be made by anyone in the organization is bad. All the kids acquired last year are a waste, as are all the kids in this year's draft, especially the QB--or unless they're an O-lineman. Your'e something akin to football's version of Miss Cleo, right?

Unless the Panthers FO has angered the football gods--upset the fabric of the universe by its very existence--and been handed down a sentence of being the perpetual victims of Murphy's law, it never EVER works out like you are suggesting. Some of the additions made last year, whether on the field or the sidelines will finally bear fruit, and at least one of the QB prospects in the 2022 draft will ultimately become a legitimate starter in the NFL, not to mention all of the other prospects at other positions, not only a few of the O-lineman. That's how this thing always works.

Edited by top dawg
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

I am secretly hoping we do anyway. 

usually the "lets just suck for a year, get the coach fired, get a high pick" attitude is unique to the message board communities among fandoms. Those are generally the most hardcore of fans that follow it year around and want to discuss them more than just water cooler chit chat or whatever.

for the most part, people that follow a team don't keep up with the day to day, just want to have a good time at games, and hey if they win great! if they lose they'll find something else to do around midseason. 

but every single person I bring up the panthers with, from friends that are casual fans to patients I'm just shooting the poo with, want the panthers to tank and to get rid of rhule. It's amazing. everyone would be fine with 0-17 if it meant rhule was gone and we didn't blow a bunch of draft picks on nothing.

Darnold broke this fanbase's mind. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, PandaMan said:

I have faith in The Fiddler and Dan Morgan.  I do not have faith in Matt Rhule.  They know football and the NFL, Rhule does not.  This offseason has been overwhelmingly positive and has a different vibe from the previous two years; hopefully Rhule was stripped of some personnel decisions 

Or maybe Rhule is learning and adapting from his NFL experience.  That's usually what happens when people gain experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, top dawg said:

At this point, I think you're just being cynical to be cynical. Every move that has been made and will be made by anyone in the organization is bad. All the kids acquired last year are a waste, as are all the kids in this year's draft, especially the QB--or unless they're an O-lineman. Your'e something akin to football's version of Miss Cleo, right?

Unless the Panthers FO has angered the football gods--upset the fabric of the universe by its very existence--and been handed down a sentence of being the perpetual victims of Murphy's law, it never EVER works out like you are suggesting. Some of the additions made last year, whether on the field or the sidelines will finally bear fruit, and at least one of the QB prospects in the 2022 draft will ultimately become a legitimate starter in the NFL, not to mention all of the other prospects at other positions, not only a few of the O-lineman. That's how this thing always works.

Horn is probably the only one I see from last year that will end up as an impact player in the last class. There are some potential depth guys but that seems to be about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...