Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How dangerous is Willis as a runner? What makes him special?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Its a weird horse to hitch your wagon to considering everyone and their brother all acknowledge that he needs a LOT of work.  I dont give 2 chits if he can throw it a country mile or run over some white boy from some school named North Texas he is going to need extensive time and coaching just to be able to start an NFL game and even then its a crapshoot if he can become above average.  The offense he ran at liberty has been described as "elementary" and he didnt throw much in between the hashes.  He has so far to go its not even funny.  How many coaching staffs are goign to have to work with him to get him able to play?

It's kinda odd to me that all the talk about Trey Lance not even being close to ready doesn't have people backpedaling pretty hard on Willis. They just seem so similar as prospects IMO. If anything, Willis might even be more raw.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

What is your infatuation with Willis.  It's wonderful he can run fast.  We don't need a QB that can run fast we need one that can throw the ball.  ACCURATELY and from all I've heard he's not very accurate. 

This.

All these "running" QB's get figured out eventually and nearly always have a shorter shelf life than your pocket passers - or even your mobile but NOT running QB's.  I want a guy who even if his legs are failing can still scare the defense.  If John Elway or Steve Young were playing hurt / unable to run, they could still just kill you.

We need a bit of that around here.  I'm not convinced any of these rookies will be that, but Willis is the LEAST convincing of them all.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Its a weird horse to hitch your wagon to considering everyone and their brother all acknowledge that he needs a LOT of work.  I dont give 2 chits if he can throw it a country mile or run over some white boy from some school named North Texas he is going to need extensive time and coaching just to be able to start an NFL game and even then its a crapshoot if he can become above average.  The offense he ran at liberty has been described as "elementary" and he didnt throw much in between the hashes.  He has so far to go its not even funny.  How many coaching staffs are goign to have to work with him to get him able to play?

I mean I know you and a lot of guys who look at things the old fashion way can't see it. But the NFL is taking notice and things are in motion... teams are making moves and gearing up to make thing happen.. that usually means qb.. And no that isn't Pickett

Screenshot_20220404-165244_Plume.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's kinda odd to me that all the talk about Trey Lance not even being close to ready doesn't have people backpedaling pretty hard on Willis. They just seem so similar as prospects IMO. If anything, Willis might even be more raw.

 

I am thinking of it in the context of Rhules timeline.  We as a franchise cannot afford the luxury of drafting Lance/willis with the luxury of sitting them and trying to develop them.   Thats just not our reality.    A person like Fields, Jones or Pickett could probably come in day 1 and start.  Right or wrong that is where rhule and this franchise is at

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, micnificent28 said:

I mean I know you and a lot of guys who look at things the old fashion way can't see it. But the NFL is taking notice and things are in motion... teams are making moves and gearing up to make thing happen.. that usually means qb.. And no that isn't Pickett

Screenshot_20220404-165244_Plume.jpg

that is quite the reach you are speculating there.  Also other teams do dumb poo every year, it doesnt make it right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

that is quite the reach you are speculating there.  Also other teams do dumb poo every year, it doesnt make it right

It is speculating... but it looks a lot like what San Francisco did last year to aquire trey Lance. If you want to say Daniel Jeremiah doesn't know poo... that's fine. But it's easy to see someone falling in love with Willis's tools..  there is NO better option this year.. if you need to gamble on qb why not gamble on the biggest arm and fastest playmaker. 

Doesn't mean it's right or the right choice but it's definitely tempting.. 

Edited by micnificent28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Against scrub schools 

That's what I really worry about. All of a sudden everybody is big, everybody is fast, everybody is strong. Can you now play QB?

What in your game can you change to take it to the next level when you reach the next level? QBing. Guys that are already QBing like a guy with two consecutive seasons with 70% completions can jump in and produce.

If you're getting him for the purpose of running it's putting the cart before the horse.

Vick ran a 4.25 or something like that and Cam was/is a tank who builds up speed and trucks CBs, LBs. Cam did it to/against SEC talent. That's why Cam is/was elite and also why Vick was elite.

They were elite runners in their own different ways but were good/great QBs in the making. Both had to add advanced QBing to their obvious physical advantages as they became NFL veterans.

You can't be regular fast or regular big and have pretty ok accuracy and be ok at QBing and thrive in the NFL. 

Edited by rippadonn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

What is your infatuation with Willis.  It's wonderful he can run fast.  We don't need a QB that can run fast we need one that can throw the ball.  ACCURATELY and from all I've heard he's not very accurate. 

 except Willis isn't all that inaccurate which is why teams are falling in love with him

Screenshot_20220404-172321_Chrome.jpg

Edited by micnificent28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

That's what I really worry about. All of a sudden everybody is big, everybody is fast, everybody is strong. Can you now play QB?

What in your game can you change to take it to the next level when you reach the next level? QBing. Guys that are already QBing like a guy with two consecutive seasons with 70% completions can jump in and produce.

If you're getting him for the purpose of running it's putting the cart before the horse.

Vick ran a 4.25 or something like that and Cam was/is a tank who builds up speed and trucks CBs, LBs. Cam did it to/against SEC talent. That's why Cam is/was elite and also why Vick was elite.

They were elite runners in their own different ways but were good/great QBs in the making. Both had to add advanced QBing to their obvious physical advantages as they became NFL veterans.

You can't be regular fast or regular big and have pretty ok accuracy and be ok at QBing and thrive in the NFL. 

I mean if Josh Allen's rushing ability remained a threat at the next level why wouldn't Willis? Is he slower than Allen? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, micnificent28 said:

I mean if Josh Allen's rushing ability remained a threat at the next level why wouldn't Willis? Is he slower than Allen? 

A) Allen didnt run in college

B) Allen is much much larger then Willis

C) Allen and his development is an aberration far from the norm.   If you are hanging your hat on willis developing like JA then we are going to be in for some even more painful seasons

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

I mean if Josh Allen's rushing ability remained a threat at the next level why wouldn't Willis? Is he slower than Allen? 

You said yourself that Willis needs a lot of work.  Rhule's under the gun right now to win and doesn't have time to wait for a QB to develop.

Pickett or Howell are better choices if you ask me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can say that I have defended Canales because I get that they are doing all they can to keep from looking like idiots for drafting Bryce, from the trade up to signing $150m guards to drafting XL and Brooks etc---nothing seems to work.  And Hiring Canales was part of the Bryce Young rehab program, so so he can't really decide to "move on."  That has to come from Morgan and Tepper. Personally, I think Bryce is due for an injury.  He is small, he is not thick, and he has been a LOT more healthy than most any other QB has who has endured so much pressure.  The thing that bothers me is this---Bryce really does not go through his progressions quickly.  He locks on to his presnap read and stays locked onto him for too long--he seems to fail to anticipate the WR/TE's positioning on the play before the cut--for example, if the WR is running a dig and the CB has his back to the inside of the field, he should be open for a second or less just after the cut.  He seems to wait until the cut has been made before deciding, then checking down quickly while moving in the pocket. OL:  There seems to be a lack of communication--is that on Mays?  Watch this team presnap--they seem a bit confused at times.   I can almost predict the success rate of the play by watching the center and QB before the snap.  
    • Anyone else remember back in 2010 when Fox piloted having music under the in-game replays during one of Carolina's games? Not the commercial bumpers but the actual replay clips that the announcers would talk over. Pretty sure it was vs the 49ers. And it was terrible. Point being, Carolina continues being so bad that we get the networks trying things out during their games.
    • Is it bad I found this video more hilarious than pathetic? I am still laughing at that one play where half the people on the field ran into each other and Bryce still couldn't see Chuba wide open... Also laughing at Cade blocking nobody and somehow losing his cleat Man this offense is a poo show
×
×
  • Create New...