Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

KC looking to trade up into top 10.

DaveThePanther2008
 Share

Recommended Posts

mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

I am. I prefer to be in our current situation than in one where we’re locked into Fields for 3 more years without Horn. At least there is light at the end of the tunnel with Darnold’s last year under contract here. Fields, to date, is another Darnold and I’m glad we’re not locked into that longer term. 

I mean, everyone is entitled to their opinion but holy fug thats a lot to stomach.  You would rather have Darnold then Fields for 2022.  got it

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ECHornet Grand Master

ECHornet

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I mean, everyone is entitled to their opinion but holy fug thats a lot to stomach.  You would rather have Darnold then Fields for 2022.  got it

They were the same garbage last year. 
 

Yes, I’d rather only be locked into subpar QB play for 1 year instead of 3. Why would you prefer the opposite? Hope that Fields improves? Yea, we did that with Darnold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ENCPantherfan2 Collaborator

ENCPantherfan2

Posted
Posted

I rather do it with the Packers. Both their 1sts, 1 of their 2nds, next year's 3rd, and Jordan Love should be enough. You address the QB situation by giving Daronld competition , and if Love works out a long term solution, picks to use at both D-line and O-line, and a 2nd for additional depth. Packers can go and get Aaron Rodgers on the of the best WRs in the class (Wilson, Olave, etc.) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
firefox1234 Grand Master

firefox1234

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, ECHornet said:

They were the same garbage last year. 
 

Yes, I’d rather only be locked into subpar QB play for 1 year instead of 3. Why would you prefer the opposite? Hope that Fields improves? Yea, we did that with Darnold. 

At least Fields would actually be a rookie and not “basically a rookie” like Darnold…

Edited by firefox1234
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ECHornet Grand Master

ECHornet

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

At least Fields would actually be a rookie and not “basically a rookie” like Darnold…

He’s not a rook anymore. A second year QB that has been less successful than Trubisky in similar situations. Everyone ragged on Mitch while many here covet Fields. I don’t get it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

according to this draft chart: https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp?RequestTeam=car

The Chiefs would have to trade us 29, 30 and 50 in order to make it equitable (we'd likely have to give them a fifth rounder too)

 

I'm for trading down but if Evans, Ickey or even Cross is at 6 you have to wonder whether or not a franchise LT is worth more than those picks. God forbid all three of those are gone I do this trade in a heartbeat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DavidEng
      Canes vs Flyers Gm 3 Rd 2 8pm

      By DavidEng · Posted

      It’s like being on the Flyers broadcast team feed so far
    • philit99
      Canes vs Flyers Gm 3 Rd 2 8pm

      By philit99 · Posted

      Boy the flyers look good early. Lots of bad plays and slow start by our team. Hope that changes before the score changes.
    • strato
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By strato · Posted

      I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes into account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as another treading water year (at QB). I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room. Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. That’s how I look at it. 
×
×
  • Create New...