Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers terminating Rock Hill project agreements


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 6/3/2022 at 4:55 PM, Anybodyhome said:

I know business property owners in my city who have a different LLC for each property they own, thereby protecting all their other properties if one tanks.

Matter of fact I was doing some title work yesterday for a local commercial building owner who has 6 buildings downtown, and for each of them the property owner is the address LLC, for example, "123 Main St., LLC." There's no limit to the number of LLCs you can create and they're all separate entities.  

Yep, Ryan Newman owns property near me and it is listed as RKN Farms LLC, RKN Farms II LLC  and RKN Properties LLC. It is the same as Dale Jr. Owning property listed as RDEJ REVOC TR,  RDEJ Restated 2005 REVOC TR, and his sister owning the property around his ( they both use it) Dirty Mo Acres LLC, and Dirty Moe Acres LLC. I can give many examples... but you get it. This was more for the people who didn't know this information. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

then you answer this

Serious question.  Do you think Tepper/Panthers have any role in the bonds being issued? Where are talking in general.  Go back and time.  RH needs to issue bonds.  Do you think they need Tepper in any way for that? 

 

I don't know...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

You want to take it to mean that they blame Tepper less than they do Rock Hill. That's not true.

 

This is a false statement.  I never said that.  I know you want to make it a blame competition.  You all want to make sure that Tepper gets at least some blame. 

I  was just surprised the COUNTY IS SUING THE CITY because as the county's lawsuit states:
"Ultimately, the City of Rock Hill failed to issue the required bonds, the development project collapsed"

Then the angry dude came storming in.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, poundaway said:

This is a false statement.  I never said that.  I know you want to make it a blame competition.  You all want to make sure that Tepper gets at least some blame. 

I  was just surprised the COUNTY IS SUING THE CITY because as the county's lawsuit states:
"Ultimately, the City of Rock Hill failed to issue the required bonds, the development project collapsed"

Then the angry dude came storming in.

Standard operating procedure for Carnac...

...literally fabricates statements 💯 and attributes them to others as fact 🤦‍♂️.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

would the zoning for this building be considered Commerical? It is listed as MP-C

Master Planned Commercial (MP‐C): The purpose of the MP‐C district is to provide mixed‐use retail and office  development, with limited moderate and higher‐density residential uses integrated into the development above street levels and as separate stand‐alone uses. Rezonings to MP‐C districts must be at least 10 acres unless City  Council reduces the minimum size during the rezoning process.  

Would that not allow it just to stay where it is, and not have to be torn down? 

 

First and foremost, it is and will remain private property. Therefore, any issues the city has with respect to zoning, ordinance or nuisance violations have to be addressed with a legal notice.

At some point, the city could view this as an eyesore which is having an adverse effect upon property values (which is a fairly catch-all and generic, but often used phrase, in municipal, county and state ordinances and statutes). They can then demand the property owner take action to mitigate the violation and, if there is no compliance, the city could, theoretically, demolish the place.

Not that any of this will happen, but, by the book, that's how it works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

First and foremost, it is and will remain private property. Therefore, any issues the city has with respect to zoning, ordinance or nuisance violations have to be addressed with a legal notice.

At some point, the city could view this as an eyesore which is having an adverse effect upon property values (which is a fairly catch-all and generic, but often used phrase, in municipal, county and state ordinances and statutes). They can then demand the property owner take action to mitigate the violation and, if there is no compliance, the city could, theoretically, demolish the place.

Not that any of this will happen, but, by the book, that's how it works.

Oh, I am not saying it wont be private property, I was just under the impression that there is not many ordinances if it is considered commercial. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I don't know...

Well, if you don’t know….how do you explain being so adamant that Tepper isn’t partially to blame with RH on the bond mess?  Which you have been doing for months 

RH has made some legit accusations that need answers on the bond issue.  Tepper has chosen silence when asked on this specifics.  

so both look at fault there IMO until proven otherwise.  Yet you consistently dig in to it only being RH to blame. 

so it doesn’t square 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Well, if you don’t know….how do you explain being so adamant that Tepper isn’t partially to blame with RH on the bond mess?  Which you have been doing for months 

Fine I'll say it for you.

Tepper is to blame.

There, is it all better now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Well, if you don’t know….how do you explain being so adamant that Tepper isn’t partially to blame with RH on the bond mess?  Which you have been doing for months 

Why would Tepper ever submarine the bond issue?

What does he stand to gain by doing so?

If you have info implicating Tepper put it out there pal...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Why would Tepper ever submarine the bond issue?

What does he stand to gain by doing so?

If you have info implicating Tepper put it out there pal...

RH made the accusations about the bond mess and Teppers part. Tepper refused to respond to those allegations.  All that has been discussed. 

I’m saying both them likely have fault and fugged this thing up.  This was new for RH AND Tepper. 

You keep digging in to it being all and only RH,  I’m merely saying both are likely to blame for it falling apart.  And you have consistently been against THAT stance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

RH made the accusations about the bond mess and Teppers part. Tepper refused to respond to those allegations.  All that has been discussed. 

I’m saying both them likely have fault and fugged this thing up.  This was new for RH AND Tepper. 

You keep digging in to it being all and only RH,  I’m merely saying both are likely to blame for it falling apart.  And you have consistently been against THAT stance. 

You didn't answer his question you just kept repeating what you've said over and over.

Why would Tepper undermine RH issuing the bonds?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft/bestavailable
    • https://www.pff.com/news/draft-the-best-remaining-players-ahead-of-day-3
    • Per PFF: 1. CB Jermod McCoy, Tennessee Volunteers McCoy's medical evaluations will be critical, but based on his measurables and 2024 tape, he profiles as a first-round talent with shutdown potential in press-man coverage. 2. CB Keith Abney II, Arizona State Sun Devils Abney's lack of length and top-tier athleticism may limit him to zone schemes, but his competitiveness and run-defense mentality make him a valuable rotational defensive back with starter potential. 3. CB Keionte Scott, Miami (FL) Hurricanes Scott is a tone-setter in run defense with a physical mentality. His zone coverage is adequate, but man coverage limitations may restrict his role. 4. WR Skyler Bell, Connecticut Huskies Bell looked uncoverable at times against his level of competition in his final season and, despite below-average size and athleticism, produced like a top-100 prospect as a productive slot receiver. 5. WR Bryce Lance, North Dakota State Bison Lance dominated FCS competition as a versatile “X” receiver. He moves well for his size and pairs that with reliable contested-catch production, giving him a strong case as an early Day 3 pick with the potential to develop into a contributing NFL receiver. 6. ED Joshua Josephs, Tennessee Volunteers Josephs has an appealing blend of size and explosiveness but must improve his technique and anticipation to reach his potential. 7. ED Dani Dennis-Sutton, Penn State Nittany Lions Dennis-Sutton projects best as a 3-4 defensive end with some 4-3 flexibility. His length and size are clear strengths, though his agility in space is more limited. With ascending play, he could be drafted higher than his current tape suggests. 8. DI Gracen Halton, Oklahoma Sooners Halton is an undersized, versatile defensive lineman who wins with quickness, effort and movement skills. His lack of strength can be an issue, but he fits well in multiple or movement-based fronts. 9. HB Mike Washington Jr., Arkansas Razorbacks Washington brings alluring size, straight-line speed and yards-after-contact potential as a power back, but also noticeably good vision and footwork to be a potential early-down back in a committee in a man- or gap-scheme run game. 10. WR Elijah Sarratt, Indiana Hoosiers Sarratt may profile as a below-average athlete for an NFL “X” receiver, but there is still plenty to like in his game. His strong hands, coordination and determination at the catch point — combined with his constant competitiveness — give him starter potential as an outside WR2 in offenses that value jump-ball opportunities. 11. WR Deion Burks, Oklahoma Sooners Burks' size and production do not clearly point to a future NFL contributor, but his athleticism and strength make him difficult to dismiss. He offers intriguing upside as an explosive slot receiver, though he may not fit every scheme. 12. DI Darrell Jackson Jr., Florida State Seminoles Jackson is a massive, powerful defensive tackle with imposing physical traits. When his hand usage is right, he can be dominant, but inconsistency in technique and processing limits his impact. He remains a high-upside prospect. 13. C Connor Lew, Auburn Tigers Lew is a technically sound center with excellent leverage, balance and posture. His consistent fundamentals allow him to win positioning battles, though he can struggle against top-end power due to his lighter build. His upside is high given his age and technique. 14. LB Kyle Louis, Pittsburgh Panthers Louis is an undersized linebacker who projects best as a versatile space defender. In the right role, he can be an impact nickel player thanks to his explosiveness and coverage ability. 15. S Kamari Ramsey, USC Trojans Ramsey provides versatility with the ability to play both safety spots and the slot, particularly in two-high looks. His lighter build and good — but not elite — athleticism cap his ceiling. 16. CB Chandler Rivers, Duke Blue Devils Rivers logged 3,186 defensive snaps across four seasons at Duke and allowed just one touchdown in coverage in 2025, with a sub-85.0 passer rating when targeted for the third straight year. He earned a 90.7 PFF grade in 2024 before taking a step back in 2025. Over the past three seasons, he has been flagged just four times while playing more than 70% of his snaps on the outside. 17. C Sam Hecht, Kansas State Wildcats Hecht delivered a strong 2025 campaign, earning an 80.3 PFF overall grade that ranked fourth among centers. He brings a balanced profile, ranking 10th in PFF run-blocking grade (77.7) while holding up adequately in pass protection. Across 759 snaps, he allowed just seven pressures, with zero sacks and zero quarterback hits, and committed no penalties. 18. CB Devin Moore, Florida Gators Moore is an appealing Day 2 prospect with a strong blend of length, speed and ball skills for press-man coverage, though his injury history could impact his draft position. 19. G Jalen Farmer, Kentucky Wildcats Farmer put together a solid but unspectacular 2025 season, earning a 69.8 PFF overall grade that ranked 93rd among guards. His best work came in pass protection, where his 72.4 PFF pass-blocking grade ranked 256th, while his 67.4 run-blocking grade ranked 113th. Across 818 snaps, he allowed 14 pressures, including three sacks and no quarterback hits, and committed one penalty. 20. ED LT Overton, Alabama Crimson Tide Overton fits best as a 3-4 defensive end with inside-out versatility. He can contribute in a 4-3 as a power end, but his lack of bend and stride length limits his ability to consistently threaten the edge. 21. QB Garrett Nussmeier, LSU Tigers Nussmeier brings NFL bloodlines and a polished, foundational approach to the position, traits that fuel his confidence as a vertical pocket passer. However, his average arm strength and below-average stature could create challenges for his aggressive, gunslinging style at the next level. 22. DI Rayshaun Benny, Michigan Wolverines Benny earned a 79.3 PFF grade in 2025, ranking 62nd among 887 qualifying interior defenders. He posted a 68.5 pass-rush grade (161st) and an 83.5 run-defense grade (35th). His production leaned toward run defense, with a clear disparity between phases. 23. S Genesis Smith, Arizona Wildcats Smith has intriguing size and athletic traits for a single-high role, but inconsistency with physicality and play strength limits his reliability. 24. HB Jonah Coleman, Washington Huskies Coleman may not have the flashy athleticism of a fan-favorite RB1, but his game is efficient, powerful and translatable to NFL success, specifically behind zone-blocking schemes where he can gain momentum and one-cut into rushing lanes. He also brings plus third-down reliability as a receiver and pass protector. 25. LB Keyshaun Elliott, Arizona State Sun Devils Elliott has shown flashes as a downhill player, with effectiveness as a run defender and blitzer, but his below-average frame helps explain his limitations in coverage. He earned PFF grades of 67.8 in 2024 and 67.5 in 2025, which reflect a steady but unspectacular profile. His struggles in coverage may limit his role at the next level, though he still offers some starting upside in the right situation. 26. S Zakee Wheatley, Penn State Nittany Lions Wheatley is a long, springy athlete best suited for single-high roles. His slender build can be exposed in the box, but he offers strong range and coverage ability in space. 27. CB Malik Muhammad, Texas Longhorns Muhammad is a decorated cornerback from one of the nation's best secondaries, and his size and pedigree point to starting potential at the next level, particularly in a zone-oriented scheme. He earned PFF grades of 78.5 in 2023, 71.7 in 2024 and 70.8 in 2025. His lighter frame and limited disruptiveness remain concerns and may factor into evaluations despite the overall profile. 28. TE Michael Trigg, Baylor Bears Trigg may have one of the widest ranges of outcomes in the 2026 class. At his best, his vertical athleticism and contested-catch ability suggest top-50 potential, but inconsistencies with technique and focus create volatility in his projection. 29. DI Dontay Corleone, Cincinnati Bearcats Corleone, known as “The Godfather,” was one of the most dominant run defenders in 2022, using his size and strength to control the line of scrimmage. His performance has declined in recent seasons, and his 2024 medical history adds some concern. He offers rare quickness for a nose tackle and can control blockers despite shorter arms, though his pass-rush impact remains limited. He projects as a traditional 3-4 nose tackle. 30. T Dametrious Crownover, Texas A&M Aggies Crownover stands out for his massive frame at 6-foot-7 and 319 pounds with over 35-inch arms, which should earn him a look at the next level. However, he must translate those physical traits more consistently in pass protection to reach his potential. He earned a 58.4 pass-blocking grade in 2025 and allowed two sacks, two hits and 23 hurries across 428 pass-blocking snaps. 31. ED Anthony Lucas, USC Trojans Lucas has an NFL-ready frame and good overall athleticism for his size, but he does not consistently win quickly enough to project as a full-time edge rusher. His length and strength give him versatility across the front in odd schemes. 32. LB Deontae Lawson, Alabama Crimson Tide Lawson is undersized but experienced and quick. He projects as a rotational linebacker with some starting potential. 33. DI Kaleb Proctor, Southeastern Louisiana Lions Proctor, No. 111 on PFF’s Big Board, offers an unusual profile given his size and level of competition, but his explosiveness and pass-rushing ability stand out. His 2025 production supports that evaluation, as he earned an 86.5 PFF grade and generated 39 pressures, including nine sacks, four hits and 26 hurries. His performance against LSU in particular highlights his upside and reinforces his case as a potential late-round value. 34. CB Will Lee III, Texas A&M Aggies Lee, No. 114 on PFF’s Big Board, offers an intriguing developmental profile, as his size, length and leaping ability translate to strong ball skills. He earned a 66.5 PFF grade in 2025 after a stronger 76.2 mark in 2023, and he recorded eight pass breakups in each of the past two seasons. His run defense, tackling and penalty discipline remain areas for improvement, but the physical tools and ball production point to late-round value. 35. G Billy Schrauth, Notre Dame Fighting Irish Schrauth’s career included injury setbacks, but his play on the field showed a high level of performance for Notre Dame. He earned an 82.7 pass-blocking grade and a 73.1 run-blocking grade in 2025, and he did not allow a sack or a hit while surrendering just two hurries across 213 pass-blocking snaps. His game features strong pad level, a firm anchor in pass protection and good grip strength, though balance and foot speed present some limitations. The overall profile supports projection as a starting-caliber interior lineman. 36. WR Brenen Thompson, Mississippi State Bulldogs Thompson’s elite speed and big-play ability will draw interest, but his below-average size and inconsistent contested-catch rate complicate his projection. He ran a 4.26 40-yard dash, which ranks in the 100th percentile at the position, along with a 2.53-second 20-yard split in the 93rd percentile. In 2025, he caught 57 of 87 targets for 1,054 yards and six touchdowns, averaging 2.77 yards per route run and 4.3 yards after the catch per reception
×
×
  • Create New...