Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers terminating Rock Hill project agreements

Dorian Gray

By Dorian Gray,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Devil Doc Collaborator

Devil Doc

Posted
Posted
On 6/3/2022 at 4:55 PM, Anybodyhome said:

I know business property owners in my city who have a different LLC for each property they own, thereby protecting all their other properties if one tanks.

Matter of fact I was doing some title work yesterday for a local commercial building owner who has 6 buildings downtown, and for each of them the property owner is the address LLC, for example, "123 Main St., LLC." There's no limit to the number of LLCs you can create and they're all separate entities.  

Yep, Ryan Newman owns property near me and it is listed as RKN Farms LLC, RKN Farms II LLC  and RKN Properties LLC. It is the same as Dale Jr. Owning property listed as RDEJ REVOC TR,  RDEJ Restated 2005 REVOC TR, and his sister owning the property around his ( they both use it) Dirty Mo Acres LLC, and Dirty Moe Acres LLC. I can give many examples... but you get it. This was more for the people who didn't know this information. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CRA said:

then you answer this

Serious question.  Do you think Tepper/Panthers have any role in the bonds being issued? Where are talking in general.  Go back and time.  RH needs to issue bonds.  Do you think they need Tepper in any way for that? 

 

I don't know...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

You want to take it to mean that they blame Tepper less than they do Rock Hill. That's not true.

 

This is a false statement.  I never said that.  I know you want to make it a blame competition.  You all want to make sure that Tepper gets at least some blame. 

I  was just surprised the COUNTY IS SUING THE CITY because as the county's lawsuit states:
"Ultimately, the City of Rock Hill failed to issue the required bonds, the development project collapsed"

Then the angry dude came storming in.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, poundaway said:

This is a false statement.  I never said that.  I know you want to make it a blame competition.  You all want to make sure that Tepper gets at least some blame. 

I  was just surprised the COUNTY IS SUING THE CITY because as the county's lawsuit states:
"Ultimately, the City of Rock Hill failed to issue the required bonds, the development project collapsed"

Then the angry dude came storming in.

Standard operating procedure for Carnac...

...literally fabricates statements 💯 and attributes them to others as fact 🤦‍♂️.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

would the zoning for this building be considered Commerical? It is listed as MP-C

Master Planned Commercial (MP‐C): The purpose of the MP‐C district is to provide mixed‐use retail and office  development, with limited moderate and higher‐density residential uses integrated into the development above street levels and as separate stand‐alone uses. Rezonings to MP‐C districts must be at least 10 acres unless City  Council reduces the minimum size during the rezoning process.  

Would that not allow it just to stay where it is, and not have to be torn down? 

 

First and foremost, it is and will remain private property. Therefore, any issues the city has with respect to zoning, ordinance or nuisance violations have to be addressed with a legal notice.

At some point, the city could view this as an eyesore which is having an adverse effect upon property values (which is a fairly catch-all and generic, but often used phrase, in municipal, county and state ordinances and statutes). They can then demand the property owner take action to mitigate the violation and, if there is no compliance, the city could, theoretically, demolish the place.

Not that any of this will happen, but, by the book, that's how it works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Devil Doc Collaborator

Devil Doc

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

First and foremost, it is and will remain private property. Therefore, any issues the city has with respect to zoning, ordinance or nuisance violations have to be addressed with a legal notice.

At some point, the city could view this as an eyesore which is having an adverse effect upon property values (which is a fairly catch-all and generic, but often used phrase, in municipal, county and state ordinances and statutes). They can then demand the property owner take action to mitigate the violation and, if there is no compliance, the city could, theoretically, demolish the place.

Not that any of this will happen, but, by the book, that's how it works.

Oh, I am not saying it wont be private property, I was just under the impression that there is not many ordinances if it is considered commercial. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I don't know...

Well, if you don’t know….how do you explain being so adamant that Tepper isn’t partially to blame with RH on the bond mess?  Which you have been doing for months 

RH has made some legit accusations that need answers on the bond issue.  Tepper has chosen silence when asked on this specifics.  

so both look at fault there IMO until proven otherwise.  Yet you consistently dig in to it only being RH to blame. 

so it doesn’t square 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CRA said:

Well, if you don’t know….how do you explain being so adamant that Tepper isn’t partially to blame with RH on the bond mess?  Which you have been doing for months 

Fine I'll say it for you.

Tepper is to blame.

There, is it all better now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CRA said:

Well, if you don’t know….how do you explain being so adamant that Tepper isn’t partially to blame with RH on the bond mess?  Which you have been doing for months 

Why would Tepper ever submarine the bond issue?

What does he stand to gain by doing so?

If you have info implicating Tepper put it out there pal...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Why would Tepper ever submarine the bond issue?

What does he stand to gain by doing so?

If you have info implicating Tepper put it out there pal...

RH made the accusations about the bond mess and Teppers part. Tepper refused to respond to those allegations.  All that has been discussed. 

I’m saying both them likely have fault and fugged this thing up.  This was new for RH AND Tepper. 

You keep digging in to it being all and only RH,  I’m merely saying both are likely to blame for it falling apart.  And you have consistently been against THAT stance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
Just now, CRA said:

RH made the accusations about the bond mess and Teppers part. Tepper refused to respond to those allegations.  All that has been discussed. 

I’m saying both them likely have fault and fugged this thing up.  This was new for RH AND Tepper. 

You keep digging in to it being all and only RH,  I’m merely saying both are likely to blame for it falling apart.  And you have consistently been against THAT stance. 

You didn't answer his question you just kept repeating what you've said over and over.

Why would Tepper undermine RH issuing the bonds?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CPF4LIFE
      Where would the Panthers be if they sat Bryce Young last season?

      By CPF4LIFE · Posted

      So let me ask you this, and this is assuming you watched the first 2 games of the season. The falcons game was a back and forth between to 2 bad teams until bryce throws 2 crucial picks to help atlanta pull away. The second game was a sloppy game where the defense scored and our offense did absolutely nothing till the 4th quarter, bryce even fumbles and saints return for a TD. If Dalton starts both of those games is the outcome and playout still the same for both games?
    • CRA
      Where would the Panthers be if they sat Bryce Young last season?

      By CRA · Posted

      sure.  I acknowledge we had a rookie making rookie mistakes.  You fail to acknowledge a pushing 40 Dalton however paired up in this trainwreck wasn't going to yield significantly better results. good results.   And Dalton didn't even win his game vs a wrecked Seattle D.  Andy Dalton couldn't even find a way for his team to beat the Carolina freaking Panthers in 2022.  A team with an interim HC, that couldn't score, playing like it was 1970.   And Andy Dalton had REAL weapons on the field at his disposal.   All Dalton had to do was score more than 10 points.  He couldn't pull that off.    I probably got as little faith in Bryce as anyone here.   But I'm not willing to go this Andy Dalton route.  Maybe he wins 4ish here.  But he wasn't doing much here.  Dalton isn't Cincy Dalton.  
    • ForJimmy
      Where would the Panthers be if they sat Bryce Young last season?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      What do you think really happens here?  Do you think that Seattle loss with half a secondary is a realistic game for Dalton to consistently have?  Do you expect 40 year old Dalton to throw it 60 times and rack up 361 yards while constantly getting hit to work against other teams?  If we played him all year do you think he would rack up 6,137 yards 34 TDs and 0 INTs on over a thousand attempts?  That games wasn't a great game.  We were trailing all game and he threw it against a terrible secondary 60 times averaging 6.6 yards an attempt.  He had one "deep" pass to Chark (wide ass open) for 27 yards who ran another 20 for a TD.  That's not happening against other teams.  I would be surprised if Dalton made it two more games taking those kinds of hits and probably losing both of those games.  Our OL sucked, Our coaches sucked, and our weapons sucked.  Remember Rhule beat Andy Dalton and his Saints offense (which has a better OL and better weapons) just the prior year.  Yeah Matt Rhule...  Darnold put up 43 yards and 2 INTs and Dalton STILL couldn't beat him.  That's embarrassing.
×
×
  • Create New...