Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, DamnItJake! said:

🙄 Defense!?? Can we draft a new coach while we are at it.. need a LT.. I get it though BPA if we can’t trade back..

What if the LT has a 88 rating and the DE has a 96 rating? Who do you pick?

Plus who is replacing reddick as a starter? Haynes??? 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Chief Keek said:

I can't see Fitterer not trading back, there's way too much value at that spot and they need all the draft capital they can get.

I hope he doesn’t.  I think people got too giddy about his trade downs last go round. 

take a premier OT prospect and call it a day.  You shouldn’t of traded away your picks.  Lessons learned.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Add up the draft pick value of our picks we've spent on offense vs. defense. 

 

Way to walk it back. You claimed "Under Rhule we've spent all our draft assets on D while trying to build an O off the NFL's trash heap." Which is categorically wrong.

 

After being called out. You want to bring out a chart. lol

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Way to walk it back. You claimed "Under Rhule we've spent all our draft assets on D while trying to build an O off the NFL's trash heap." Which is categorically wrong.

 

After being called out. You want to bring out a chart. lol

Cool. 😂

I thought it would be obvious that "all" didn't mean literally "all" but you do you.

But, you're done and you're not mad, right? 😂😂 😂

Do the math. I'll be shocked if it doesn't come out 4:1 D:O in a completely offensively driven league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Way to walk it back. You claimed "Under Rhule we've spent all our draft assets on D while trying to build an O off the NFL's trash heap." Which is categorically wrong.

 

After being called out. You want to bring out a chart. lol

We have had 5 picks in the first 2 rounds under Rhule and 4 of the 5 have been defense.  Including 2 top 10 defensive players. 

he is right.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Cool. 😂

I thought it would be obvious that "all" didn't mean literally "all" but you do you.

But, you're done and you're not mad, right? 😂😂 😂

Do the math. I'll be shocked if it doesn't come out 4:1 D:O in a completely offensively driven league.

 

Way to spin that BS. You are good at it. Have you ever in your life ever accepted you made a mistake? I don't think you could.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chief Keek Veteran

Chief Keek

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CRA said:

I hope he doesn’t.  I think people got too giddy about his trade downs last go round. 

take a premier OT prospect and call it a day.  You shouldn’t of traded away your picks.  Lessons learned.

If there's a top OT still there, that should definitely be the choice. Otherwise, in my opinion, trade back into the mid-range of the first. There's a lot of holes on this roster and this draft is loaded between rounds two through four.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CRA said:

I hope he doesn’t.  I think people got too giddy about his trade downs last go round. 

take a premier OT prospect and call it a day.  You shouldn’t of traded away your picks.  Lessons learned.

I think a big part is the team has more than 1 hole to fill. And about the only way to get more picks is trading that 6th. If you look at most drafts, trading comes to end after the begining of the 4th.......which the panthers have pick 137 thats 31 away form the start. That late 4th has nearly no trade value. So unless Burns/Brown/______ is getting moved(ultra rare on draft day), the only means to add multiple lotto tickets is trading the 6th overall for a teams 1st, 2nd, and 6th. 

Ick and Neal may not be there and Cross for me is not worth 6th overall when a stud edge is there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CRA said:

We have had 5 picks in the first 2 rounds under Rhule and 4 of the 5 have been defense.  Including 2 top 10 defensive players. 

he is right.  

 

AW, did you need to come to his rescue?

 

5 Offensive picks in last years draft. 3 well respect Offensive FA this year. But hey, you guys are the bomb.

 

You guys will spin anything to fit your agenda. Face facts, we have spend resources on Offense. And Georgie Boy said otherwise. Him wrong. But I guarantee he will not admit it.

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

AW, did you need to come to his rescue?

 

5 Offensive picks in last years draft. 3 well respect Offensive FA this year. But hey, you guys are the bomb.

 

You guys will spin anything to fit your agenda. Face facts, we have spend resources on Offense. And Georgie Boy said otherwise. Him wrong. But I guarantee he will not admit it.

hubby how are spending draft day? like food and booze wise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Dude is a monster. I honestly don't see how he isn't a a top 10 lock after testing out as an absolute freak. 3-4 NT, 3 tech, 5 tech. I think he can do it all.

Apparently some view him as a two down player. If he does end up being that, it would be a massive overdraft to take him top 10.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, CRA said:

I hope he doesn’t.  I think people got too giddy about his trade downs last go round. 

take a premier OT prospect and call it a day.  You shouldn’t of traded away your picks.  Lessons learned.

The level of jerking off over trading down is mystifying. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MasterAwesome
      How many Qbs can you name better than Bryce Young?

      By MasterAwesome · Posted

      You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
    • CRA
      A question no one is asking about Bryce and The Panthers

      By CRA · Posted

      CMC said he expected to play his career here.  He didn't think he would be traded.  Carolina decided they wanted to trade him.  He picked here he wanted to go.   But we dumped him.  For largely peanuts.   But we dumped DJ Moore and he never had a blood and guts game.   So it's never a guarantee. 
    • Manna
      A question no one is asking about Bryce and The Panthers

      By Manna · Posted

      I have many people telling me CMC was blindsided and heartbroken by the trade, but that's not how I remember everything going down.  49ers are pretty wounded right now on defense so if our offense can sustain drives and score, that'd be the difference maker. Their offense? I'm not scared of CMC. 
×
×
  • Create New...