Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper is full of it regarding Darnold


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Fortunately our much more skilled at talking to the public GM with good chance at a longer term career here is doing more of the public talking. 

I'd rather hear Fritterer speak because he's more skilled at being informative but not saying dumb things. I sense most want Rhule and Tepper to speak to have something to be angry about. 

I wanted Tepper to speak to get a sense of what he thought about the current state of things and the direction of the franchise. From my perspective, I always thought that it was a little bit counterproductive to give him a fourth year and not a fifth because Rhule could indeed be thinking that he has  to draft this way or take that chance, and simply make reckless moves for the short term without any consideration for the long term. I always had trouble reconciling Tepper keeping Rhule this season and allowing him to add so much experienced staff only to chop him off at the knees. Now don't get me wrong; I still believe that Tepper will chop Rhule off at the knees if we continue in 2022 where 2021 left off, but if we show improvement, I can understand why Tepper would keep him another season. That being said, I'm not fond of Rhule's shtick--maybe it's just his personality--and am skeptical about how he's coached thus far (including his handling of personnel). Maybe the veteran additions to his staff will make him better. 

Edited by top dawg
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Hopefully he did.. So far not shitting on Sam until you have his replacement in house is a good 1st step..

Yeah, we will see. He was also known for being a loud mouth in his career, so who knows if that has changed. It typically gets worse and not better with age.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

No, saying that a QB who has 54 TDs, 52 INTs, and 29 fumbles in 50 games is very good makes me shake my head. Get it right!

Okay got it..

Lying to regain some value or get something out of a asset you're financially committed to makes your head explode..

Rodger that ...

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Okay got it..

Lying to regain some value or get something out of a asset you're financially committed to makes your head explode..

Rodger that ...

 

Regain some value out of a guy that has 54 TDs, 52 interceptions and 29 fumbles in 50 games...🤣

You seem to have a hard time understanding nuance. Being financially on the hook for Sam Darnold and being financially committed to him are two separate things. 

Lastly, if Tepper believes what he's saying, he's not lying. But, if he is lying and everyone knows he's lying, then it is of no strategic value at all, and you need to stop pushing such idiocy.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, top dawg said:

I know we all think Tepper is either lying or is simply delusional when he said that Sam Darnold is a "very good" QB. I was listening to the local sports station in the Triangle when host Joe Giglio gave everyone a dose of reality about Darnold in the form of stats. And, yeah, I know that people say stats lie, but it's just hard to spin these regardless of whatever excuses that anyone wants to use to delude themselves into believing that Darnold is anything more than what he has been. 

In 50 games, Sammy has 54 TDs, 52 interceptions and 29 fumbles. That's horrible! 

There's no way that I believe that anyone can come to the conclusion that Darnold is anything but a bad QB from that. Even with the excuses, perhaps you can conclude that his ceiling is average, but based upon his career, the ceiling for him is not very good [see what I did there?]!

Darnold has done nothing to raise the level of play for any team that he's played on (and, when I say "team", I'm thinking annually because each team is different). 

I simply don't believe that Tepper believes what he's saying in reference to Darnold; if he does, then we're all just wasting time here. 

He didn't want Cam, then he didn't want Teddy Bridgewater. He tried to get Matthew Stafford and then Deshaun Watson. Now, we're supposed to believe that he believes that Darnold is a "very good quarterback"? 

50 games, 54 TDs, 52 INTs and 29 fumbles! 

I agree that Tepper saying Darnold is a "very good QB" is absurd and stupid. At the same time I don't think he truly means it when we were actively looking into Deshaun Watson trade this offseason. Actions speak louder than words. And the notion that we should say positive things to support our current QB because we need leverage doesn't make sense. You can't make sh*t smell good. The whole league knows Darnold is ass. Honestly Tepper should have just said that he defers to the coaches and GM for the QB situation. You are responsible for what you say, you'll either be proven a liar or a dumbass.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CarolinaRideorDie said:

Honestly Tepper should have just said that he defers to the coaches and GM...

He did actually say several times that certain inquiries were "a Scott question".

If he ever referred to anything as "a Matt question" though, I missed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

He did actually say several times that certain inquiries were "a Scott question".

If he ever referred to anything as "a Matt question" though, I missed it.

I believe he was referring to the question about Darnold only...Tepper should've referred to and deferred to the football knowledge of Fitterer an Rhule in reference to the Darnold question.

Edited by top dawg
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I believe he was referring to the question about Darnold only...Tepper should've referred to and deferred to the football knowledge of Fitterer an Rhule in reference to the Darnold question.

I get that, but this was something I noticed in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The easy way to win in poker is to get the best hand from luck.

Another way is to convince the opposition you have the best hand when you don't.

But what really sets the best players apart is to convince people that even if they know they have the better hand, you will protect yours so much that it will still not be worth while to bet. 

Tepper knows Darnald suck, he also knows he get a lot better deals on qbs is he can convince everyone he think Darnald is the best hand. And obviously he has the fan base och local media fooled...

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...