Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Was Matt Corral the Target or a Panic Pick?


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Snake said:

Having a quality FO will do that. I'm not sure we have ever had better to be honest. Still Rhule has to coach right for it to work. 

We've never had great coaching here, maybe Foxy was, but Hurney was an anchor...but we have consistently had bad front offices.  Being the best in this teams history isn't saying much, but I sure do appreciate it.

The Teddy, Sam, CJ Henderson, CMC extension, Gilmore trade Robby extension, etc. etc. etc....we just seem to make stupid decisions, but man, this feels much smarter and calculated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Yep and unlike the past two debacles we didn’t throw away $31M in cap plus a comp 3rd or $24M in cap and a very early 2nd, very early 4th and a 6th for two guys everyone knew had very limited ceilings. 

Accurate.

If this thing clicks for Corral...this could be a wild ride.  This guy has legit arm talent, and we are building a very strong defense and seemingly a strong run game.  Sounds like Seattle 10 years ago.

I'm stoked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Umm, the draft value of a future 3rd and pick 137 isn’t close to a mid 2nd. We gave up more like mid 3rd round value for a late 3rd round pick. That’s great value if we really like him that much. I really hope he works out because that would make up for the disasters of picks and cap space for Sam and Teddy.

I did value the future conservatively by assuming we come in 32nd next year, maximizing the value of the future pick. 

a 2023 pick 65 at 265 points
and a 2022 pic 137 at  37.5 points.

For a total of  302.5 draft point 59-60... mid-late second round.

Most like to value that future pick with the lowest value to adjust for the time you don't have the player.  Its true that the  2023 picks value drops to 116 using this method, resulting in a total draft value 153.5 that we paid for Corral,  which is equivalent to pick 87-88, in the bottom half of the 3rd. 

Either way, where we picked him, even with the additional traded future pick, was cheaper than what the "draft experts" valued him, which ranged as high as pick 21 and as low as pick 53, with the average being 38.7

https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/Player/Matt-Corral-QB-OleMiss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corrall has a lot of very good traits that would be easy to build around and would produce some exciting football. He's a guy you HAVE to build your offense around, though, rather than a guy you could plop in any system and have them excel. And that's fine, because you should be able to and should be building the offense around the QB you are hoping to be your guy for years.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Corrall has a lot of very good traits that would be easy to build around and would produce some exciting football. He's a guy you HAVE to build your offense around, though, rather than a guy you could plop in any system and have them excel. And that's fine, because you should be able to and should be building the offense around the QB you are hoping to be your guy for years.

By all accounts, that's what Fitterer wants to do, so...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

By all accounts, that's what Fitterer wants to do, so...

I hope they do it and I hope they don't wait too long to get him in there. But build your offense around his traits, whether he's starting or not. You know the direction you want to go, so just build it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thefuzz said:

We've never had great coaching here, maybe Foxy was, but Hurney was an anchor...but we have consistently had bad front offices.  Being the best in this teams history isn't saying much, but I sure do appreciate it.

The Teddy, Sam, CJ Henderson, CMC extension, Gilmore trade Robby extension, etc. etc. etc....we just seem to make stupid decisions, but man, this feels much smarter and calculated.

This is all Rhule done and Teppers approved. I highly doubt Fit or Morgan would have chosen all those trades. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...