Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charlotte “unlikely” to contribute taxpayer money for new Panthers headquarters


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Mike2.0 said:
5 hours ago, Basbear said:

London 

It’s possible, but is it realistic that a roster of players and coaches would want to be located in London full time?How are the league going to deal with the travel?

Would be fun to ask Deebo Samuel about this...😂😉🤣

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/11/2022 at 3:38 PM, 3838 said:

Most times when I check in on this place and scan the comments, it's hard to believe that this is a Panthers "fan" message board. On most days I see comments on who hates the owner and team the most, and where can he possibly relocate the team. Just an outside observation.

The "Tepper Effect". I mean, it's kind of expected when a new owner immediately ushers in the worst period of losing in franchise history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/15/2022 at 2:35 PM, SizzleBuzz said:

Who is on your list?

Jay Glazer for sure is, earned that a few times went it was him against the world and he ended up right. Aaron Wilson is good for signings and other insight. Greg Cosell is great if film is your thing. Adam Schefter has caught recent heat, but been in the game for 20+ years and is normally first. Missing one or two others. But if you expect 100% accurate statements for the names, remove all names. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...