Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If this doesn’t get you excited about Matt Corral, nothing will


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, top dawg said:

Come on, man, he was never on drugs. The media obviously has gone way overboard with the alcohol stuff also. Panthers fans don't need to be the source of disinformation (even in jest). It's in poor taste at best.

You are lecturing the Huddle lowest common denominator. Waste of effort.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CRA said:

yeah, I mean there is a poster going around claiming Matt Rhule inherited a horrible situation because he lost all these leaders and former greats when got here.  However.... 

what that poster continues to ignore is Matt Rhule straight up cut them all.  He inhertied leadership and he choose to send them all packing (Luke being the lone exception.  And Luke was probably just too smart to sacrifice his body for the clown show). 

Rhule inherited Cam - Rhule cut him

Rhule inherited Olsen - Rhule cut him

Rhule inherited Reid - Rhule cut him. 

If you're referring to me.  The discussion was whether RR and Rhule walked into  comparable situations.  They didn't.

Olsen, Cam and Reid were approaching the end of their careers when Rhule came here.  Cam and Olsen had barely played in 2 years and Reid's production had dropped off.  Meanwhile,  Steve Smith, Jordan Gross,Ryan Kahlil, Deangelo Williams, Johnathon Stewart, Ted Davis, Charles Johnson, and the #1 draft pick, Cam Newton, all had plenty left in the tank.



 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, winning a single game with The Golden Calf of Bristol as your QB IMO is a pretty big accomplishment. 

I would give him high praise if The Golden Calf of Bristol was forced on him.   The fact he wanted The Golden Calf of Bristol is the headscratcher.  

Lol fair point.  If I remember correctly that defense carried them through most of their wins with him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

He only took 2018 off. He was trying to land OC jobs again starting in 2019. That’s 3 straight years of people not wanting him.  

So you preferred a different OC this time?  Who?

Or you just going to rag on the new one before there's a single offensive snap?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, KatsAzz said:

Unless Sam Darnold goes out there and has done a complete 180° in terms of his play on the field there’s no reason for them Panthers not to go with Matt Corral.

They obviously drafted him for a reason and it makes sense if the Panthers don't think they are quite playoff ready to see what they have in Corral before next years draft.

I hope what their saying is true and the best player will win  the position.    I hope Corral tears it up in camp.  If its close, Sam's going to start.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, poundaway said:

So you preferred a different OC this time?  Who?

Or you just going to rag on the new one before there's a single offensive snap?

Ben McAdoo is not my ideal OC hire.   Nor was it anyone's given he had been striking out the past 3 seasons looking to be an OC. 

But realistically, we weren't going to have great options to entertain given where we currently find the Carolina Panthers.  I accept that part.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Lol fair point.  If I remember correctly that defense carried them through most of their wins with him...

I still think The Golden Calf of Bristol could of been a great football player.  Just not a QB.  If he was willing and Skip Bayless and the media would just of allowed him to be roleplayer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, top dawg said:

What were we, like 6-10 Cam's first season? After his first game, no one needed to tell anyone that we had a franchise QB, and no one will have to tell us after Corral's first game either. Listen to what I'm saying. 

Yup.  I felt it first game.  422 yards, 3TDs.  Oh yeah.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I still think The Golden Calf of Bristol could of been a great football player.  Just not a QB.  If he was willing and Skip Bayless and the media would just of allowed him to be roleplayer. 

Worst passing mechanics I ever saw...

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

The only thing that will get me "excited" about Matt Corral is winning football games.  Chris Simms praise means nothing.  

This is true.  Didn't he like Darnold, and our trade for him?  I forget.

I still like anyone saying positive stuff about our QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you are an athlete or former athlete (myself?  Cornhole 2021-present; Disc Golf 2013-got a mega blister and had to retire; speed walking--every black Friday at Walmart 2003-2009) you know what it is to lose confidence.  Self-inflicted or not (in my view, a lot of 2023 was coaching and a lot of 2024 was confidence), he has confidence now. How fragile is it?  I think the light is on, the game slowed down, and he is ready to do his thing.  He seems to be "mobile in the pocket" instead of "running scared."   Last year, there were times when AT was out, Johnson gone, and all he really had was XL and Coker--a raw rookie with upside and an UDFA rookie.  TE was rarely a viable option. It reminded me of Benjamin and Funchess.   Moore had to step up.  This season, Bryce has weapons.  I expect XL to improve.  I expect TMac to help tremendously, and I think Coker will be solid.  Renfrow?  Horn?  bonuses.    
    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
×
×
  • Create New...