Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brady Christensen taking snaps at Center


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

He went from the 2nd graded player on our OL to possibly our best backup/depth.  It shows how much we have put into getting this OL better.

Oh boy.....I think we better not start counting those chickens yet.

I remember boatloads of Huddlers trying to justify why Cam Erving and Pat Elflein were good signings. That was a fuging disaster.

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Oh boy.....I think we better not start counting those chickens yet.

I remember boatloads of Huddlers trying to justify why Cam Erving and Pat Elflein were good signings. That was a fuging disaster.

 

I think, that is if you don't mind. I am going to rate Bozeman, and Corbet way better signings than the 2 from last year. Throw in Mays. And we have the makings of a really good Oline. 

 

This Oline, and the roster as a whole. Is much better than is was just 2 short years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Oh boy.....I think we better not start counting those chickens yet.

I remember boatloads of Huddlers trying to justify why Cam Erving and Pat Elflein were good signings. That was a fuging disaster.

Regardless of how they turn out a huge effort was made by our staff to address this weakness.  Corbett and Bozeman have been solid starters plus 2 draft picks with one being in the top 10 (arguable the best OL in the draft) shows we are serious about fixing this.  If they don't work out I can't be too mad at Fitt and Company for trying.  Throw in our new OL coach as well.  

I do get what you are staying though.  I'm not crowning them out best OL in history or anything, just glad a serious effort was made to address this issue.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fear of the past only clouds your judgement of the future.

 

The future is bright and exciting.

The past is gloomy and dark.

 

The future holds great promise.

The past holds fear and misery.

 

Give me the bright future every time.

Edited by iamhubby1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Regardless of how they turn out a huge effort was made by our staff to address this weakness.  Corbett and Bozeman have been solid starters plus 2 draft picks with one being in the top 10 (arguable the best OL in the draft) shows we are serious about fixing this.  If they don't work out I can't be too mad at Fitt and Company for trying.  Throw in our new OL coach as well.  

I do get what you are staying though.  I'm not crowning them out best OL in history or anything, just glad a serious effort was made to address this issue.

Well we were supposedly "serious" last year with Erving and Elflein too. I like the Corbett and Bozeman signings a lot more. I like that we finally invested in a LT in the first round. 

But.....the staff has worked very hard to get a QB as well, right? Arguably the hardest in the NFL. What has been the net result so far?

So, while I want to get excited about the OL, I have completely lost faith in the ability of our franchise to consistently make intelligent decisions on personnel. 

At this point this is what their persistent failings have reduced my opinion to. I gotta see these guys do it on the field first. I need to see some cohesive OL play. I need actual results before I get optimistic about it. They lost all benefit of the doubt.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Smithers said:

Bozeman can play guard at a high level.  Might not be crazy to think that Bozeman is our LG and BC is our C.  Lots of options 

 

Using the SWAG method. I foresee our starting Oline thusly.

 

LT-Icky

LG-MAYS

C-Bozzy

RG-Corbett

RT-Moton

 

Let these guys work, and let Brady be first off the bench.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Using the SWAG method. I foresee our starting Oline thusly.

 

LT-Icky

LG-MAYS

C-Bozzy

RG-Corbett

RT-Moton

 

Let these guys work, and let Brady be first off the bench.

Might be asking a lot of a late round rookie to start at LG right away. I would say don't overlook some of the vets like Michael Jordan or Pat Elflein. I think those two guard spots aren't exactly locked in. 

Well, they shouldn't be anyway. I definitely don't want a replay of 2021 where we see spots basically gifted to the overpaid FA scrubs we signed.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Well we were supposedly "serious" last year with Erving and Elflein too. I like the Corbett and Bozeman signings a lot more. I like that we finally invested in a LT in the first round. 

But.....the staff has worked very hard to get a QB as well, right? Arguably the hardest in the NFL. What has been the net result so far?

So, while I want to get excited about the OL, I have completely lost faith in the ability of our franchise to consistently make intelligent decisions on personnel. 

At this point this is what their persistent failings have reduced my opinion to. I gotta see these guys do it on the field first. I need to see some cohesive OL play. I need actual results before I get optimistic about it. They lost all benefit of the doubt.

 

I get being skeptical.  Campen wasn't there to sign off on last year's OL (who weren't in the same level as Bozeman or Corbett).  He also is going to be the one developing them with McAdoo running the offense.  MUCH different than Brady and whoever our OL coach was last year.  

The QB issue is different because we constantly struck out on our top choices like Stafford, Russ, Watson etc... Rhule tried to get fancy and sign OL that can play multiple positions (just none that well).  They tried a much more proven tactic this year in signing proven starters for FA OL.  If there were serious about getting a QB the proper way we would have drafted Mac or Fields to compete with Darnold, but instead we thought we were smarter than everyone else and could develop him Darnold into something he isn't.  Two totally different scenarios IMO if they helps you feel better about the situation.

I'm not saying these OL will be the greatest, but pairing a great OL coach in Campen with proven OL talent in Bozeman, Corbett, and Moton plus a high potential pick in Icky should have a much greater chance at success than past years.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LT- Icky, RG-Corbett, and RT-Moton are pretty much the givens.  Bozeman is going to either play LG or C which leaves one open position.  I could see us starting with LT-Icky, LG- Bozeman, C-Elf, RG- Corbett, and RT-Moton to have 4 capable vets to help develop Icky.  If Icky develops fast then Bozeman can slide to C and one of the younger guys in Brown, Mays, or BC might get their shot at LG. 

Love the Icky pick, but he will have some issues pass blocking early on this season.  He has all the tools to be great physically and mentally.  He should be a stud at run blocking pretty quickly. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Might be asking a lot of a late round rookie to start at LG right away. I would say don't overlook some of the vets like Michael Jordan or Pat Elflein. I think those two guard spots aren't exactly locked in. 

Well, they shouldn't be anyway. I definitely don't want a replay of 2021 where we see spots basically gifted to the overpaid FA scrubs we signed.

 

Jordan should be gone. Let's get that out of the way right off the bat. Elfien is good depth, which is fine.

 

As for Mays? Starting LG in the SEC, with the attitude to match. Put him and Icky together, and let them grow together for the next 2 decades.

 

The ONLY spot on the Oline open for competition? LG. And we have Mays, Brady, and maybe even Brown to work into that spot.

 

Our line is going to be much improved, an actual strength.

 

A little bit of tweaking, and a little bit of luck. And this roster will be solid. And YOUNG

 

Edited by iamhubby1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Jordan should be gone. Let's get that out of the way right off the bat. Elfien is good depth, which is fine.

 

As for Mays? Starting RG in the SEC, with the attitude to match. Put him and Icky together, and let them grow together for the next 2 decades.

 

The ONLY spot on the Oline open for competition? RG. And we have Mays, Brady, and maybe even Brown to work into that spot.

 

Our line is going to be much improved, an actual strength.

 

A little bit of tweaking, and a little bit of luck. And this roster will be solid. And YOUNG

 

I assume you mean LG; Corbett will be the starter at RG.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Well damm. There goes my perfect record. lol

 

Thank goodness for that edit button.

I don't share your overall unbridled optimism for a few reasons, but no question that the OL (players and Campen alike) appears to have taken a massive leap forward. If things pan out to even half of the potential that exists then that will be a large boost to the foundation of the offense.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I said this last night to family. You can look at Bryce as not a “strong and physical” presence and that’s not going to change on you can look at it, that this guy has the type of skillset that sets him up to only get better for the next 5-7 years every year. He’s not going to know less about the game next year than this year. His timing will be better, his pocket presence better (even though the guy works around a pocket amazingly in my opinion), everything is just going to improve every year and I believed he’s already proved the doubters wrong other than nut huggers on here who just want a big strong man to drool over.
    • The Seahawks won an emotional, divisional, overtime rivalry game vs the Rams on a Thursday night (Dec 18).  That gives them 10 days to prepare for the Panthers, but the Christmas holiday fell a week later--I bet they were afforded an extra day for travel-many coming back east.  Following the Panthers, Seattle plays at San Francisco for the division title (in all probability).   The Rams finish the season with games against the Falcons and Cardinals, two likely wins, pushing them to 13-4.  The Niners finish the season with home games against the Bears and Seahawks. Seattle finishes the season with the Panthers on the road and SF in California.   It is easy to see how preparing for the Panthers, during the holiday break and with the Niners waiting for them in SF a week later for (what could be) the NFC West title and #1 Seed in the NFC, could create the perfect trap game scenario.  The Panthers at home are 5-2.   In the past 2 weeks, the Seahawks struggled to beat the Phillip Rivers Colts in Seattle and then pulled off a miraculous, emotional victory at home vs. the Rams.  I am not convinced that they are as good as advertised. Seattle is a TD favorite in Charlotte.  I feel that Carolina by 3 may be more accurate.  While I am still not confident in this team's consistency and it never seems to dominate, it sure feels like a trap game for Seattle to me.  How could they NOT be thinking of San Francisco right now?  They are not used to being in this position (current players) and it is human nature.  Carolina 27, Seattle 24. 
    • It is a tough decision.  There is another factor.  Is he in game shape?  A tired Hunt is not better than an "in-shape" Corbett.  When coming off an injury, it is natural to want to protect the injured area, even if it is completely healed.  This can cause you to contort your body for no reason, lose fundamentals, and it could lead to other injuries.  For example, I had a knee in high school that required getting taped.  That made me aware of the knee (not used to tape on my knee) and I pulled my groin (favoring or dragging the leg with the tape).  The trainer explained the groin injury the way I do here--but scared money makes no money.  If he is cleared to play, he is cleared to play.  Watch him, rotate him in for a series, etc.  Specifically, I would want to watch the matchup--who is winning more--Corbett or Hunt?  How is the defense reacting (if at all) to Hunt being in?  Etc.  
×
×
  • Create New...