Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes Vs Rangers Game 7


Recommended Posts

Just now, MillionDollarCam said:

Tampa is gonna wreck New York so whatever.

Tampa was going to wreck either of these teams, along with Colorado or Edmonton (and we can probably throw Toronto in there also and maybe Calgary).

Unfortunately our team is built for the regular season and not the playoffs. Gotta have stars to carry you and outside of maybe aho, we don't have any other forwards that can carry us.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 high stick non calls. You break our goalies leg, non call. At this point I don’t care about the win. How many rangers can we injure should be the third game. I’m not one to wish injuries in sports. But when your opponent is doing it and not getting called, that’s when you put the sports book nation on the edge. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

I'd also say Tampa isn't as good as people think this season... Plus Point is done for the season. 

Watch the clinic Tampa put on Florida on defense in their series. The commitment all of their players had to blocking shots was amazing. Our players have not shown anything close to that and instead decide to leave kreider wide open in front of the net on a PP...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

3 high stick non calls. You break our goalies leg, non call. At this point I don’t care about the win. How many rangers can we injure should be the third game. I’m not one to wish injuries in sports. But when your opponent is doing it and not getting called, that’s when you put the sports book nation on the edge. 

We should, but we won't. Again, we have nobody on our team that has the balls to do that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Tampa was going to wreck either of these teams, along with Colorado or Edmonton (and we can probably throw Toronto in there also and maybe Calgary).

Unfortunately our team is built for the regular season and not the playoffs. Gotta have stars to carry you and outside of maybe aho, we don't have any other forwards that can carry us.

This core has had four seasons to get it done and they just can’t. I think we know their ceiling. There needs to be significant changes in the offseason. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

I'd also say Tampa isn't as good as people think this season... Plus Point is done for the season. 

They say he’ll be back this series. Idk. It’s not Tampa of the past two seasons, it appears the league wants the rangers in the cup. Of the teams left. Let’s go Colorado. As much as I hate this current iteration. If they got rid of Kadri I’d be down with them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Darnold is basically a really high level game manager. Put him on a good team where he isn't required to provide lift and he can shine. But when you need him to do the franchise QB thing and put the team in his back here comes the INTs. He just doesn't seem to have any positions on his dial between "super conservative take whatever's there and take care of the ball" and "YOLO!!! There's a receiver down there somewhere in that sea of defenders!"
    • See, it's posts like this that show me how many of you are taking my post as an anti Dowdle post and saying he didn't have a good game, but that's the furthest thing from my intention and what I'm trying to say. Because that's the comparison you're making with Bryce, it's adding or removing a small handful of plays from their stats and saying "this is the game they could have had instead" I'm literally only talking about the play calling from the game, it's literally in the title of the thread, that we still have play calling problems. I'm saying that people are going to get stuck on the 200 yard rushing game by a player and extrapolate that to "well Canales must have called a good game" and I'm trying to say not to fall for that mirage. Because 6 big runs do not make for a well called game when we had over 60 snaps. Even beyond that, if you add in the two 20+ yard catches from T-Mac and the one XL had, and you're looking at 9 of over 60 snaps that accounted for close to 60% of our yards in the game. That's a few big plays covering up for coaching deficiencies, that's NOT a well called 60 minutes of football. Had he had the 200 yards because Canales' play calling was keeping the defense on their heels, not knowing what we were doing next, and Dowdle was ripping of 8-12 yard runs on a consistent basis, then yea, that would be something to be excited about with Canales finally calling a good game for a change. Our offense is predictable and the play design is basic, there is nothing I've seen out of Canales' offense that says he's able to scheme and call plays to outsmart the defense, which is something all the elite offensive coaches are able to do in this day and age.
    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
×
×
  • Create New...