Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker Mayfield is a Carolina Panther


uncfan888
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I'm pleased about the deal and all along was good with the consideration of it...

...ditto if it had been Winning Jimmy G. 💥👊

You predicted the Browns wouldn't trade Mayfield and cited a no-name writer (probably about the only guy you could find who agreed) as if it bolstered your argument.

As for Garoppolo, the Panthers didn't want him. Heck, he might now end up in Cleveland.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

There is no value at all if it doesnt factor into our long term plans.  We are not winning the super bowl this year and its a damn stretch with our schedule to think we will be in contention for a wildcard spot, so I just dont see the damn use of it at all.  There is no future with him.   Its another wasted season.

Brother you dont know what the future holds and the super bowl or pointless is pathetic too. In a era were starting QB are getting 40+ million, panthers may have found one thats on a one year try out for 4.85. Thats great if youre a panther fan, off-field stuff aside. panthers can tag and keep him or tag and trade him if he gos off as well. 

Panthers have been sucking at QB moves, but this is a legit win. Sorry your Baker hatred will not let you see the bright side of this. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

basically whats the point for a 1 year rental and they break it down long term and short term

I'm not a real big fan of one year rentals, but for a conditional fourth / fifth rounder two years from now, throwing in that his old team pays the majority of his salary?

That's not a bad deal at all.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You predicted the Browns wouldn't trade Mayfield and cited a no-name writer (probably about the only guy you could find who agreed) as if it bolstered your argument.

As for Garoppolo, the Panthers didn't want him. Heck, he might now end up in Cleveland.

Dang Scot has a memory, thats how I seen it too. Sizzle just like you stating over and over Tepper would not fire Marty Herniay and did. You thought more than few times Baker would remain a brown and even play...... FYI Bro thats not happening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not a real big fan of one year rentals, but for a conditional fourth / fifth rounder two years from now, throwing in that his old team pays the majority of his salary?

That's not a bad deal at all.

its not a bad deal but it doesnt do poo for the long term, what exactly does it accomplish for one year?

 

Listen to the podcast they break it down from all sides, pro/con long term short term

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Basbear said:

Dang Scot has a memory, thats how I seen it too. Sizzle just like you stating over and over Tepper would not fire Marty Herniay and did. You thought more than few times Baker would remain a brown and even play...... FYI Bro thats not happening. 

Wasn't that long ago, really...

What made it stick out in my mind though was that he found some no-name reporter and tried to build them up as if they were a better source than established writers like Mary Kay Cabot and Tony Grossi 😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

its not a bad deal but it doesnt do poo for the long term, what exactly does it accomplish for one year?

Listen to the podcast they break it down from all sides, pro/con long term short term

I don't think it was done for the long term.

The guy who currently holds the ultimate sign off power isn't necessarily assured that he has a long-term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

6 minute mark

 

basically whats the point for a 1 year rental and they break it down long term and short term

So are there new rules this season that prevent the panthers form re-signing Baker long-term after the season? They also have his rights via tagging as well. The one year is a blessing given it could go off rails too. Perfect type of risk for the panthers to take. The point of it all is too improve team talent and with this trade the QB room has improved. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...