Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Player snap counts vs Commanders


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I think what really chaps my ass is, though we are fans, we still see obvious flaws in their games.  It isn't that we dislike them because we just don't want to like them.  They cannot be effective starters.  Worse than that is we actually have players that aren't just marginally better but leaps and bounds better.  Younger, Stronger and more versatile.   

Outside of having his ego ruined.  Rhule can't be this blind, than again he is. 

 

But the question is not whether they have flaws, but can we get/afford anyone that is better.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WUnderhill said:

Either they thought the game and the reps were so meaningless and unimportant that they might as well give PJ Walker the most snaps at QB, or the possibility of Rhule trying to send Corral to the PS is more real than it should be. It’s one or the other.

This fan base is going to need to prepare itself for Corral to get cut, then light it up somewhere else later this season. P.J. Walker will play most of the next two games, because he's Rhule's favorite player and whether he does better or worse doesn't matter. He could go 0-16 for 0 yards and 7 INTs, and he's still not getting cut. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

This fan base is going to need to prepare itself for Corral to get cut, then light it up somewhere else later this season. P.J. Walker will play most of the next two games, because he's Rhule's favorite player and whether he does better or worse doesn't matter. He could go 0-16 for 0 yards and 7 INTs, and he's still not getting cut. 

I really wish Fitt had control over who to cut and McAdoo had control over who starts on offense. Limit Rhule to mismanaging time outs and it would be palatable 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I think what really chaps my ass is, though we are fans, we still see obvious flaws in their games.  It isn't that we dislike them because we just don't want to like them.  They cannot be effective starters.  Worse than that is we actually have players that aren't just marginally better but leaps and bounds better.  Younger, Stronger and more versatile.   

Outside of having his ego ruined.  Rhule can't be this blind, than again he is. 

 

There are numerous examples of how bad Rhule is at his job. Will Grier destroyed PJ Walker last preseason, but was cut because he didn't play for Temple. Now, Grier has the inside line on Dallas' backup QB job and has gotten rave reviews from coaches and media throughout camp.

Corral will meet the same fate in 3 weeks, when the headlines entering Week 1 are about how the hapless Panthers traded up for a QB they didn't let practice in camp, who barely got any preseason run, and who got cut so the Temple-Baylor Job Bank could stay in business. 

Ekwonu, on another team, is starting preseason week 1. Here, he's gonna be a healthy scratch at least 10 weeks out of the year. Matt Rhule has had a hand in 3 drafts now, and out of about 25 picks he's made one (1) good one: Jeremy Chinn. 

Man makes Hue Jackson look like Bill Belichick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Walker is a 1 year signing. Stone is a 1 year. BC is coming back from an Achilles injury. Typically takes 2 years to get back to full health, but he's also better inside than at tackle. Yosh retired. Moton will have 1 year remaining on his contract and he's already admitted knee issues. That's banking on a whole lot of nothing at the end of this upcoming season.  As far as challenging Bryce, a challenge can come from any round. It's about finding the right QB with the physical and mental talent that fits the system. Wilson, Dak, Purdy, Brady. Just a few examples of non 1st round QBs that were able to challenge the starters.  Another QB doesn't necessarily have to beat out Bryce, but we should be looking for another starting caliber QB. It's not like Bryce has set the bar so high it's unattainable. The bar is low. The goal is playoffs. Do we throw away a season if Bryce gets hurt, because KP is taking us nowhere. Dan has made some great signings this FA period, I give him that. But replacing Dalton with KP is not aggressively improving our QB room. It's at best a lateral move. This is all about getting better. But this is yet another move that makes it even less conspiracy theory, and more reality, that Bryce is being protected from any real adversity in our QB room. 
    • Oh I think it will be. My point was that we need to be trying to get better in the QB room. KP doesn't do that. He's not going to be a long term plan with a 1 year contract. He's just insurance.  This "should" be a make or break year for Bryce. Either He's a guy worthy of an extension or not. Bringing in a rookie number 2 with potential may net us nothing, or it could get us something. The one thing we can be certain of is KP gets us nothing and that's not a good position to be in.  I don't want to go into next year with no number 2, Bryce not having developed I to a real QB1, and sitting at 12 or 15 needing to move up to take a QB in the draft just like we did for Bryce. It's not an outcome I see going well for us. 
    • Well it hasn't paid off in 3 years - so let's double down and give him 2 more years of replacement level play, eh?
×
×
  • Create New...