Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tuesday practice tweets


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, frankw said:

It's been talked about adnauseum over the years each time of the year around now that the first team offense and especially the offensive line needs reps together as much as possible to get the kinks out. Add in a new OC and a starting quarterback who has been here for only a few months and yes even a blind homer should be able to admit we shouldn't have wasted reps on Sam. If we look sluggish expect the folks acting like this is no big deal to disappear or act deaf dumb and blind about their past remarks.

 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Don't forget Elflein calling out blocking assignments. Having a competent center has a cascade effect on the entire line. Especially with as many new parts as ours. 

We need to keep an eye on how cohesive that group is early in the season.

Agreed. From what I’ve read, Boseman wasn’t playing well at first and then went out with an injury. That makes me wonder if the injury was causing the poor play early. Either way, I chalk Elflein getting most reps at 1st team center to Boseman being injured. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't use week one as much of a benchmark for anything, honestly.

But if you want to use it as a benchmark for how training camp went, that might be a bit of a risk. Most teams go into week one looking kind of sloppy on offense, especially given the training camp and practice rules that were imposed by the most recent CBA.

I also don’t expect everything to be harmonious in the first few games. It just frustrates me that all this whining in the preseason about reps may all go unchecked if we come out and look cohesive. Very few posters would come back and say that maybe Rhule and staff were right. 
 

My opinion is Baker likely has received a similar amount of work with his receiving corp as most QBs this off-season. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Agreed. From what I’ve read, Boseman wasn’t playing well at first and then went out with an injury. That makes me wonder if the injury was causing the poor play early. Either way, I chalk Elflein getting most reps at 1st team center to Boseman being injured. 

Yeah, that is a big concern. Elflein is a known and obvious weakness so if Bozeman isn't a substantial upgrade, that could torpedo a lot of the improvements we supposedly made on that unit.

That is why my primary concern is for our OL and DL units. They are thin on talent and high on question marks. And both units are very, very, very shallow in terms of quality depth.

We need to develop chemistry quickly and stay healthy. Otherwise it may drag down some big improvements on both sides of the ball.

Very nervous about that situation.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

I also don’t expect everything to be harmonious in the first few games. It just frustrates me that all this whining in the preseason about reps may all go unchecked if we come out and look cohesive. Very few posters would come back and say that maybe Rhule and staff were right. 
 

My opinion is Baker likely has received a similar amount of work with his receiving corp as most QBs this off-season. 

Here's the thing, though...

Training camp is about getting starters ready for action, not backups.

Yes, it's possible to have people compete for positions. But come on, everybody and their brother knew from the minute Mayfield was signed that he should be the starter. Likewise, pretty much everyone knew that Ickey Ekwonu should be manning the left tackle spot.

Forcing those guys to compete for those roles was stupid. All it ended up doing was taking away valuable time that could have been used for the starters to gain chemistry with each other.

Could it still work out okay? Possibly, but that doesn't take away the fact that it was a dumb idea. And no, it isn't just fans that have been saying that.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Panthers running back Christian McCaffrey couldn't say enough about how Sam Darnold has handled losing the starting quarterback job to Baker Mayfield. "He's been somebody from the inside looking out, who has to take a lot of crap from a lot of different areas. He hasn't said a word, shows up every day, does his job, focuses on what he can focus on and controls what he can control. It's admirable . . .I have nothing but respect for him.''

 
 
David Newton, ESPN Staff Writer
David Newton, ESPN Staff Writer21m

As a Panther fan, I'm glad Baker got the job.

As a human, I look at this man that may not have been our answer at QB1, but that has done everything in his power to try to be, and to be a great teammate while going through a horrible situation.  We sit here looking at someone who may be the 32nd best at his job in the entire world and we call him an idiot and trash.

I agree with CMC.  I have nothing but respect for him.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Here's the thing, though...

Training camp is about getting starters ready for action, not backups.

Yes, it's possible to have people compete for positions. But come on, everybody and their brother knew from the minute Mayfield was signed that he should be the starter. Likewise, pretty much everyone knew that Ickey Ekwonu should be manning the left tackle spot.

Forcing those guys to compete for those roles was stupid. All it ended up doing was taking away valuable time that could have been used for the starters to gain chemistry with each other.

Could it still work out okay? Possibly, but that doesn't take away the fact that it was a dumb idea. And no, it isn't just fans that have been saying that.

Baker typically finds motivation in perceived slights. I’m not upset if the staff tried to stoke the fire there, even if Baker and staff knew the eventual result. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Baker typically finds motivation in perceived slights. I’m not upset if the staff tried to stoke the fire there, even if Baker and staff knew the eventual result. 

Yeah, I'm not a fan of "tricking" guys into playing well. I much prefer seeing them coached.

But even accepting that premise, how do you answer for the failure to let the starting OL practice together to build chemistry and gel into a cohesive unit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah, I'm not a fan of "tricking" guys into playing well. I much prefer seeing them coached.

But even accepting that premise, how do you answer for the failure to let the starting OL practice together to build chemistry and gel into a cohesive unit?

Part of coaching is finding ways to motivate your players. 
 

You assumed earlier everyone believe Icky at starting LT was a foregone conclusion, but I disagree. He’s a rookie and that’s a tough position to be one. Many wondered if BC might be better at LT with Icky at LG for this year. I’m still not convinced that might not work out better. Either way, the staff had to assess the rookie first. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

I don't buy the creating a perceived slight angle. I think Will Kunkel summed it up best in his explanations. And it's not 1 single thing. Reality is rarely so simplified.

Are you referring to this tweet…

If so, I think #4 covers the competitive spirit angle I was going for. Thanks for pointing me towards his take and I agree with him. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Part of coaching is finding ways to motivate your players. 
 

You assumed earlier everyone believe Icky at starting LT was a foregone conclusion, but I disagree. He’s a rookie and that’s a tough position to be one. Many wondered if BC might be better at LT with Icky at LG for this year. I’m still not convinced that might not work out better. Either way, the staff had to assess the rookie first. 

 

Icky against Miles in the first game is worrisome.  If BC slides out for a few games, I'm fine with that.  

 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ECHornet said:

Part of coaching is finding ways to motivate your players. 
 

You assumed earlier everyone believe Icky at starting LT was a foregone conclusion, but I disagree. He’s a rookie and that’s a tough position to be one. Many wondered if BC might be better at LT with Icky at LG for this year. I’m still not convinced that might not work out better. Either way, the staff had to assess the rookie first. 

They also had to coach him up.

And seriously, how often do you see a guy picked in the top ten not start?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
    • If we’re eliminated I want the wins more.   The season is already a disappointment and if I’m not pulling for wins why bother to tune in?
    • Two things terribly wrong with this post. First is that not one time has myself or anyone else agreeing with me said that the team themselves should think that way or try and lose for positioning.  Never once have I suggested the team should purposefully lose games, ever.  I honestly can't understand why people keep saying this in posts, not one fan has ever said the players should or would purposefully try to lose. And second, is yes, that has happened and it's happened very recently.  The 2020 Bengals were 4-11-1 and then were playing in the SB the very next season.   And while it might have been 2 years later and they didn't quite get to the SB, the 2021 Lions were 3-13-1 and then the 2023 Lions were up 24-7 at halftime of the NFC Championship game. The season between those two? They finished 9-8 and only just missed the playoffs. Which is why I keep trying to compare us to the Lions in where we are at in our re-build.  Throw out Bryce's rookie year with the Reich staff who just didn't work out and he looked god awful.   This past season when we were 5-12 in Canales' 1st season is that 2021 season for the Lions and their 1st season under Campbell.  This year is their 2022 where they grew a ton and Campbell's culture building was clear, where I'm saying we'd likely be better off in the long run if we go 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss out on the playoffs (which is still a significant improvement from last year).  Then our 2026 is their 2024 when we have a chance to be a real contender after adding a few more pieces and our key players having another year of experience under their belts.
×
×
  • Create New...