Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mayfield comment on the Browns game


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

That would be him saying it.

Uhh, no. 

Once again, she literally said it wasn't about the Browns.  So how could Baker say he was going to fnck up the Browns?

Second she said SHE said it.

You're going to believe whatever you want Mr Scott.  She says its being misreported and she shouldn't have reported it.  SHE is saying this.  I guess for you, if she doesn't tweet it, it isn't true. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That would be him saying it.

Likewise, if he actually didn't say those particular words, she would state that quite clearly.

I interpret this differently.  I interpret the exchange as:

REPORTER:  "Go F* them up Baker"  (colorful well wishes for start of season)

BAKER:  "I will"  (thanks)

That's probably all it was, based on what I've seen.  Then, someone decided then needed more followers or whatever and made more of it.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That would be him saying it.

Likewise, if he actually didn't say those particular words, she would state that quite clearly.

Once, again, your post title says Browns game.

SHE SAYS NO ONE SAID THAT.  NOT HER OR BAKER.

Your title is patently false.

Edited by poundaway
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Uhh, no. 

Once again, she literally said it wasn't about the Browns.  So how could Baker say he was going to fnck up the Browns?

Second she said SHE said it.

You're going to believe whatever you want Mr Scott.  She says its being misreported and she shouldn't have reported it.  SHE is saying this.  I guess for you, if she doesn't tweet it, it isn't true. 

 

1 minute ago, poundaway said:

Once, again, your post title says Browns game.

SHE SAYS NO ONE SAID THAT.  NOT HER OR BAKER.

Your title is patently false.

Yeah sorry, she's not saying that. I get that's what you want her to be saying, but it isn't.

And she did tweet, specifically a statement with no denial of what he said, same as everything else she's spoken.

If it weren't true, it'd be very easy to say so. She isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

 

Yeah sorry, she's not saying that. I get that's what you want her to be saying, but it isn't.

And she did tweet, specifically a statement with no denial of what he said, same as everything else she's spoken.

If it weren't true, it'd be very easy to say so. She isn't.

 

She is saying so. 

When the transcript of the video is out.  I'm posting it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BrianS said:

I interpret this differently.  I interpret the exchange as:

REPORTER:  "Go F* them up Baker"  (colorful well wishes for start of season)

BAKER:  "I will"  (thanks)

That's probably all it was, based on what I've seen.  Then, someone decided then needed more followers or whatever and made more of it.

Could be, but I get the impression that while she didn't focus her statement on the Brown, he very well might have.

Right now she seems to be trying to cover both her own ass and Baker's (especially after getting calls from both the Panthers and Browns) but for me it's a big "So what? Guys say stuff like that all the time."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BrianS said:

I interpret this differently.  I interpret the exchange as:

REPORTER:  "Go F* them up Baker"  (colorful well wishes for start of season)

BAKER:  "I will"  (thanks)

That's probably all it was, based on what I've seen.  Then, someone decided then needed more followers or whatever and made more of it.

Yup.  That is how she describes it.  But she didn't tweet it, so it can't be true.

Twitter=truth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Is this for real??? Who cares if he said he will fug them up or agreed with someone saying it??  I hope he said it and I hope he does it!  It's definitely not out of his personality to say it and I'm sure he will do everything in his power to back it up.

Pretty much...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The problem that Bryce faces is his lack of prototypical tools.  He's not the tall, strong armed mobile QB that tends to get drafted first overall.  His game is not played in underwear on a practice field.  His best asset are his intangibles.  They aren't sexy like a cannon arm or a fast 40 yard dash. OK, so we took the lesser athlete.  Bryce put up a pretty bad season with a bad team around him.  The coaching staff, for all it's platitudes, sucked.  They made sure Bryce could run a huddle, but didn't help him get better as a player.  Bad choice. Compare that to what other teams did to their Rookies:  they put them in position to succeed with better personnel and better play calling.  Sure, there are physical differences which are going to affect the outcomes, but you can't change it. Am I trying to ride to the defense of Bryce?  Only a little.  He's my favorite team's QB, and I believe in him.  Now, he's got this year to show that he's "the No. 1 for a reason" (Thanks CJ Stroud).  Will he, won't he?  I don't know at all.  That's on the D&D crew to put Bryce is position to play well.  Running the ball is going to make things a lot easier for Bryce.  Does that discount his success if he plays well?  For some of y'all it will.  Some of y'all just don't like Bryce, like he stole you DoorDash or something. Regardless, let's see what happens in 2024.  If Bryce stinks it up, then we're going back to the QB well again.  
    • we may think we know, but we don't know. we won't know what effect upgrades on the OL, coaching staff, and WR room will have. we don't know what scheme canales is going to put together. we don't know a lot of things.  that's why we play the games...to see what shakes out. plenty of reasons to think Bryce is limited this year...again. Plenty of reasons to see an improvement in his play. 
    • He did not elevate the players around him, but they de-elevated their QB.  A QB like Bryce needs a system, a strong OL, a Running game, and WRs that can get open.  Call him a manager at best, but so is a point guard.  That is all we should need.  He is smart enough to grow into a very effective player.  I once saw a Coach talking about the OL--i forget who it was Schottenheimer comes to mind--and he said, you can succeed if you have one weak link on the OL.  If you get 2 weak links, success comes 10x harder.  If you get three weak links, your season is over.  Your QB is injured, and you are unemployed (paraphrasing).  I would say that we had 4 weak links (Icky does not get a pass) and a RB who was not good at pass blocking. I am not saying the Bryce is the answer at QB--but I am saying we don't know yet. I know QBs (college) and when the OL sucks, they collapse mentally over time.  That is what we saw--a QB who had never played without the advantage.
×
×
  • Create New...