Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers cut Daviyon Nixon


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, bythenbrs said:

Character concerns?  Lady Macbeth goads Hamlet into committing regicide, Hamlet starts offing others (fratricide), and then she is driven by remorse to suicide.  Character concerns?

“That’s a bold strategy, Cotton.  Let’s see if it pays off.”

I never believed those rumors about her myself. I think they were just stories spread around about her as a form of character assassination. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah 9 tackles, 1 sack, 2 qb hits and 3 pressures on 77 snaps seems NFL caliber to me for a backup/rotational guy

Yeah, IDK if I have seen enough of him to say he is NFL caliber or not. The fact that he made it through waivers and currently sits on the PS probably isn't a great thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, IDK if I have seen enough of him to say he is NFL caliber or not. The fact that he made it through waivers and currently sits on the PS probably isn't a great thing.

Timing sure helped....teams have already bought plane tickets and formed a game plan with the players they have. I know the vikings wavied a decent DT with real NFL exp at the same time. One of the benefits to Pats scrimmage was to check players just like Nixon. 

I think hes out of position here. It seems Phil wants to run his 3-3-5 "magic" D........... Roy and Mccall are NTs, were as Nixon is a 3 tech in a 4-3. There were *rumors* that he wasnt doing enough lifting and rehab...idk. Maybe his focus was all wrong and this will help wake him up since his ego got hit with the "no team claimed" me news. Old hawkeye rumor was he was selling drugs too....

Panthers sure do need someone unknown to step up on the DL, I thought it could have been Nixon.....but now its looking like Mccall, new guy, YGM, or Brano. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Way too much drama over a 3rd string player.

Seriously! many here on the Huddle were so damn mad yesterday they lopped off their penises for some reason as if that was going to get Daviyon Nixon back on the roster. Hey maybe it worked cuz he's back on the PS roster so it sounds like lopping off your penis is a good idea 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Seriously! many here on the Huddle were so damn mad yesterday they lopped off their penises for some reason as if that was going to get Daviyon Nixon back on the roster. Hey maybe it worked cuz he's back on the PS roster so it sounds like lopping off your penis is a good idea 

Im still not over your Curry pic.....

1649123860428.thumb.png.199d0d59958da6de66a9a86c95445261.png

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...