Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC/Chubb run usage - next gen chart

CRA

By CRA,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, CRA said:

I’m stating that rational is dumb if true. The gameplan was dumb. 

best run of the game was not a McAdoo play call.  CMC picked up a botched snap and got into space…..took it 30 yards.   You would think he might of learned something from watching it.   And you would think it would be something he figured out before week 1. 


 

that was a run play called. lol. Center is pulling. Ian is blocking , DJ is blocking and RA is running a decoy streak on the strong side of the field.image.thumb.png.070016fce1f42648d5a5e97aa2b1b8a2.png

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
  • Author
Posted
11 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I agree. We did. That was my complaint on game day. The challenge to running an RPO with the QB making the decisions to pass or hand off when playing in a passionate game against a former team...... the QB wants the ball. 

 

Its the opposite of Shane Falco.

And the D can help dictate Baker keeping it too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
theinstrumental Community Regular

theinstrumental

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

And willingness to use their RB.

Maybe, but I don’t think that’s the whole picture. We had 53 snaps to the Browns’ 80. Five ended with tipped passes and four featured fumbled snaps. One screen to CMC was called back due to Ian Thomas’ holding call; at least one more got blown up. It was a really low-volume day against an opponent that controlled the clock and in an offense that couldn’t get the basics right. But I don’t think the team’s intentionally avoiding using him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
  • Author
Posted
22 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

that was a run play called. lol. Center is pulling. Ian is blocking , DJ is blocking and RA is running a decoy streak on the strong side of the field./cdn-cgi/mirage/4a2b958bb1dad2d1ddc103d883aa1d192f43e144-1663083799-1800/1280/https://www.carolinahuddle.com/uploads/monthly_2022_09/image.thumb.png.070016fce1f42648d5a5e97aa2b1b8a2.png

Baker fumbled the snap.  CMC recovered the fumble.  It becomes a busted play.   It’s why you don’t see it on the run chart.  It’s not a run play at that point.  It’s CMC making magic happen outside of a play. 

so again, the best run by CMC on the day was not a McAdoo run play.  That’s not a McAdoo play call/design getting yards.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
Just now, CRA said:

Baker fumbled the snap.  CMC recovered the fumble.  It becomes a busted play.   It’s why you don’t see it on the run chart.  It’s not a run play at that point.  It’s CMC making magic happen outside of a play.  

so again, the best run by CMC on the day wasn’t not a McAdoo run play.  That’s not a McAdoo play call/design going down lol

alright man, whatever you say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wire Dawg Rookie

Wire Dawg

Posted
Posted

Maybe I'm just simple, but you have to establish the run at the beginning of the game. Then it opens up your QB to RPO plays and is why you see a lot of teams start out run heavy, then start mixing in passes. When you start out doing 3 and outs with all passes, it sets a tone, and not a good one. Everyone knows you are going to start out running with CMC on the team, but you still do it.

Panthers with CMC, first 10 plays - 3 were runs, 3 drives, all punts.

You have a new QB, and some old team energy going, you have to set the tone with some smash mouth football. - Just my 2 cents. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SingleMalt Community Regular

SingleMalt

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CRA said:

I’m stating that rational is dumb if true. The gameplan was dumb. 

best run of the game was not a McAdoo play call.  CMC picked up a botched snap and got into space…..took it 30 yards.   You would think he might of learned something from watching it.   And you would think it would be something he figured out before week 1. 


 

so we're looking for the Fumblerooski to be installed ?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, Wire Dawg said:

Maybe I'm just simple, but you have to establish the run at the beginning of the game. Then it opens up your QB to RPO plays and is why you see a lot of teams start out run heavy, then start mixing in passes. When you start out doing 3 and outs with all passes, it sets a tone, and not a good one. Everyone knows you are going to start out running with CMC on the team, but you still do it.

Panthers with CMC, first 10 plays - 3 were runs, 3 drives, all punts.

You have a new QB, and some old team energy going, you have to set the tone with some smash mouth football. - Just my 2 cents. 

After 3 drives CMC had one carry

After 5 drives CMC had 2 carries

At halftime and after 6 drives CMC had 3 carries. 

It’s a bad staff.  And they probably will drastically overreact the other direction this week.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TrevorLaurenceTime22 Grand Master

TrevorLaurenceTime22

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CRA said:

I’m stating that rational is dumb if true. The gameplan was dumb. 

best run of the game was not a McAdoo play call.  CMC picked up a botched snap and got into space…..took it 30 yards.   You would think he might of learned something from watching it.   And you would think it would be something he figured out before week 1. 


 

Technically it wasn't a run but a fumble recovery hence why it doesn't show in CMCs stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wire Dawg Rookie

Wire Dawg

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, CRA said:

After 3 drives CMC had one carry

After 5 drives CMC had 2 carries

At halftime and after 6 drives CMC had 3 carries. 

It’s a bad staff.  And they probably will drastically overreact the other direction this week.  

If last year is any indication, they won't learn. Miami and Washington, both he had 10 attempts, last week against Cleveland, 10 attempts. Last year Arizona they got to 13 attempts and then 14 for the NE game. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MasterAwesome
      How many Qbs can you name better than Bryce Young?

      By MasterAwesome · Posted

      You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
    • CRA
      A question no one is asking about Bryce and The Panthers

      By CRA · Posted

      CMC said he expected to play his career here.  He didn't think he would be traded.  Carolina decided they wanted to trade him.  He picked here he wanted to go.   But we dumped him.  For largely peanuts.   But we dumped DJ Moore and he never had a blood and guts game.   So it's never a guarantee. 
    • Manna
      A question no one is asking about Bryce and The Panthers

      By Manna · Posted

      I have many people telling me CMC was blindsided and heartbroken by the trade, but that's not how I remember everything going down.  49ers are pretty wounded right now on defense so if our offense can sustain drives and score, that'd be the difference maker. Their offense? I'm not scared of CMC. 
×
×
  • Create New...