Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC/Chubb run usage - next gen chart


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, theinstrumental said:

That is an outside zone distribution vs a gap/power distribution. There’s nothing wrong with either emphasis. The difference on Sunday was in the execution of the teams’ offensive and defensive lines.

Gap/power and zone can run either it's just a blocking system. What we did was just try and avoid their DEs which they planned on. You have to be creative in the NFL and if you're not you get Sunday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

He's actually right as far as a strict stats perspective.

That said, I'm not sure if anybody has stated whether the play was intended to be a run or not.

Stats are right, I agree with that. 

However, it is clear as day that the call was a run play. While else would DJ and Ian engage in blocks and Elf pull? Unless it was a screen play but I believe that would be OPI on DJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

Stats are right, I agree with that. 

However, it is clear as day that the call was a run play. While else would DJ and Ian engage in blocks and Elf pull? Unless it was a screen play but I believe that would be OPI on DJ.

It looks like a run play to me too.

Again though with that said, it's kind of hard to suggest that the play was drawn up the way it came out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It looks like a run play to me too.

Again though with that said, it's kind of hard to suggest that the play was drawn up the way it came out.

Are you referring to the botched snap as hard to suggest that the play was drawn up that way? If so, I agree. No one draws up an intentional botched snap at this level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The good thing about replacing a bad player is you really have nothing to lose. If their replacement is bad so what, you didn't get much worse and probably saved money.  
    • I came over from the old Panthers Insider site. When Fox Sports bought that platform it slowly just started dying plus the guy who ran that site was dealing with some pretty significant health issues so the whole thing just slowly fell apart. Quite a few of us migrated over here. Not sure how many are still around.  I miss that place. It struck a nice balance of having enough active posters to keep productive conversation flowing but didn't have so much traffic that you end up with a lot of trolling BS. This place is getting there though since we shutdown new registrations but at some point we're going to have to open it back up or we'll watch this place slowly die off too as posters fall off for one reason or another. We just have to figure out a way to filter out the spam bots. It was a never ending battle to ban the spam bots to keep then from overrunning the site. You'd think they'd be a little more strategic. I mean, if you fill a site with nothing but spam people are just going to stop coming so it's not a sustainable model. But nope, every one of them makes dozens of duplicate threads filling up pages upon pages as soon as their account goes live.
    • lol...I don't remember that.  Although recalling what I had for breakfast yesterday is sometimes a challenge.  Hope it was a positive thing.
×
×
  • Create New...