Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC/Chubb run usage - next gen chart


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, theinstrumental said:

That is an outside zone distribution vs a gap/power distribution. There’s nothing wrong with either emphasis. The difference on Sunday was in the execution of the teams’ offensive and defensive lines.

Gap/power and zone can run either it's just a blocking system. What we did was just try and avoid their DEs which they planned on. You have to be creative in the NFL and if you're not you get Sunday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

He's actually right as far as a strict stats perspective.

That said, I'm not sure if anybody has stated whether the play was intended to be a run or not.

Stats are right, I agree with that. 

However, it is clear as day that the call was a run play. While else would DJ and Ian engage in blocks and Elf pull? Unless it was a screen play but I believe that would be OPI on DJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

Stats are right, I agree with that. 

However, it is clear as day that the call was a run play. While else would DJ and Ian engage in blocks and Elf pull? Unless it was a screen play but I believe that would be OPI on DJ.

It looks like a run play to me too.

Again though with that said, it's kind of hard to suggest that the play was drawn up the way it came out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It looks like a run play to me too.

Again though with that said, it's kind of hard to suggest that the play was drawn up the way it came out.

Are you referring to the botched snap as hard to suggest that the play was drawn up that way? If so, I agree. No one draws up an intentional botched snap at this level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You aren't any less inconsistent than anyone else here get real. And you've already declared Bryce Young a bust twice. You were up first thing this morning trying to fight people. The time you spend here is more unhealthy than anyone else clearly. Is this what you a do on other social media? Try to get people to fight you then flail about them spending time responding to you? I feel sorry for you. I hope things get better!
    • He didn't have his system in place that first draft because of Scott getting fired after the season so I give him a pass for 2024 even tho jury is still out on XL and it's a longshot but Brooks looked pretty good in his 10 snaps last year, it's possible with modern medicine he is still a good player. 
    • He was much better yesterday against the Dolphins. In fact I thought he had a very good game. Our LB's did a good job adjusting to the RPO stuff they ran early.  But he's not the long term answer. He's been consistently poor in his short tenure here. If he runs off a few more solid games like Sunday, we can have a different conversation. 
×
×
  • Create New...