Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants: The Previous Game is Under Review


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Adb6368 said:

I wonder how the defense will look if their rookie tibodeau suits up this week? May not be a huge difference but sounds like it can’t be much worse 

It depends on how healthy he is. I think they would ease him in coming off that knee injury. Probably a snap count of 10-15 maybe 20. It would be situational. Any time a player of his capability is on the field, things can change. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Adb6368 said:

I wonder how the defense will look if their rookie tibodeau suits up this week? May not be a huge difference but sounds like it can’t be much worse 

Azeez Ojulari is their other edge guys that's been out. Kayvon with an MCL and Azeez with a calf injury, both are risky to rush out there without taking really any practice reps this week. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

Azeez Ojulari is their other edge guys that's been out. Kayvon with an MCL and Azeez with a calf injury, both are risky to rush out there without taking really any practice reps this week. 

 

lol what a whiff by BC. I will say after seeing Ickey's first step off the line against a speed rush like this, I feel pretty good.  Aside of those two sacks by MG (one was due to tremble launching MG past Ickey), Ickey didnt allow the speed rush to work the rest of the way. We shal see though.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

lol what a whiff by BC. I will say after seeing Ickey's first step off the line against a speed rush like this, I feel pretty good.  Aside of those two sacks by MG (one was due to tremble launching MG past Ickey), Ickey didnt allow the speed rush to work the rest of the way. We shal see though.

Yeah he had 10 sacks last year, beat a few guys with that move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

I'm hoping we can exploit a Burns/Neal matchup but @TheCasillas have you noticed whether we tend to move Burns around on the line?  It felt like he mostly went against the LT last week but I wasn't really keyed in on him.

yea we moved him all around the line. We had him as a stand up backer and a pure end rusher. The Browns slid protection his way the majority of the time. There was one play where they actually tripled team Burns. Looked like they were setting up for a deep shot but Brissett threw it to a short out.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If Mays has a market, which it seems he will, he's gone.  I think we bring back Nijman for too much money to be cautious at LT, Corbett comes back cheap since he's already said he wants to live in CLT, and Christensen eventually gets re-signed with the hopes he can be depth at some point.  Draft an OT, draft a C. The OL might be rough for stretches next year, but time to get some youth there to prepare for Bryce in 2027 or the next QB. I still think we compete for the division in 2026 and can go back to the playoffs unlike the oddsmakers in Vegas, but the *real* year is 2027 IMO. Either Bryce has proven it and he's the QB looking at his 2nd contract, or we have the ready-made team for the next rookie QB or Vet we trade for. 
    • The Panthers are going to have a lot more flexibility in free agency than it looks like at first glance. On paper, the cap space might seem tight, but there are several obvious restructure candidates that could easily free up significant room. Between converting base salaries into signing bonuses and spreading cap hits out over future years, Carolina could realistically clear $60–80 million in additional space if they wanted to be aggressive. That kind of flexibility means they’re not stuck. They can extend key young pieces, add help along the offensive line, upgrade the defense, and still be strategic about value signings. Letting Cade Mays test the market makes sense from a leverage standpoint. If he’s willing to come back on a team-friendly deal, great, continuity on the line matters. But if his market price climbs, the Panthers should absolutely explore upgrades. The point is, this front office isn’t boxed in. With cap maneuvering and smart structuring, they have the ability to be active players in free agency rather than sitting on the sidelines like we are used too. 
×
×
  • Create New...