Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Corral


Stuart Smith
 Share

Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, rebelrouser said:

My personal opinion is to take Bryce Young or CJ Stroud at 8 IF they are available. If they are not, trade back or pick up a position of need and look for a qb in the second round. I don't see that much difference between Richardson/Levis vs. Hendon Hooker. 

I do. Richardson and Levis have a lot more physical talent than Hooker. I'm not big on Levis due to age. If you're drafting a guy primarily on upside and raw talent, he better not be the age of a typical 2nd or 3rd year NFL player. That's why I greatly prefer Richardson

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Richardson and Levis have a lot more physical talent than Hooker.

We got to see all three in the SEC East this year. Hooker had more talent around him, but his stats against similar competition were much better than Levis and a ton better than Richardson. All three of these players should go in the second round but won't. I hope we don't reach with our first pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, rebelrouser said:

We got to see all three in the SEC East this year. Hooker had more talent around him, but his stats against similar competition were much better than Levis and a ton better than Richardson. All three of these players should go in the second round but won't. I hope we don't reach with our first pick.

Stats aren't the same thing as talent. Hooker was considered a 2nd or 3rd rounder before his injury. He's probably a 4th or 5th after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hooker has a good arm but not great arm and had great running ability. Now the TN scheme made him look like a god. I watched the same guy at VT and he couldn't do a dang thing in the passing game. Maybe he figured it out, or maybe they schemed it so it was easy for him. I'm leaning to the scheme. But physical talent, the guy has it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

Yes, build the o line

And we’ve have terrific olines in the past. Cinci has a dog poo oline and Burrow is going to carry them to the playoffs. Got them to a Super Bowl without an oline. We need a young stud throwing the ball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

We actually have an o line. We need a QB and have since Cam got injured from Watt.

Need a top oline which better facilitates the qb situation ...even with Cam we suffered inconsistency for many yrs. No Cams in sight, but oline upgrade is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Varking said:

And we’ve have terrific olines in the past. Cinci has a dog poo oline and Burrow is going to carry them to the playoffs. Got them to a Super Bowl without an oline. We need a young stud throwing the ball. 

No burrow available...upgrade OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, I think you're being a little hyperbolic with the last statement, but point taken. 
    • Pass rush was the biggest issue in tonight’s game, and we were tied for 28th in sacks this season. That is a major area of need that has to get addressed this offseason. I just don’t see a path where there’s a game changing QB you can bring in with where we are drafting and quality of veterans that will be available. We certainly can do better than Dalton as a backup, and should ideally have a developmental guy  (perhaps a day 3 pick this year). We have bryce for one more year on a reasonable contract and then I think 2027 is the year that you reset that position (unless he massively improves).
    • Agreed, honestly basically bringing this group back as a healthy unit would be alright.  Brady Christensen should be resigned to a very reasonable deal with him recovering from the Achilles.  Atleast we're alright at 4 of our 5 spots with Lewis, Mays, Hunt, and Moton, Nijman was decent.  While if we can snag a deal on someone, take a stab, however our resources need to go to Linebacker, Pass Rush and a real option outside Tmac (coker is amazing, but if we can get someone who isnt braindead opposite Tmac, we can fully unleash Coker AND Tmacs full potential, cant move him into the slot if racoon boy is out there licking doorknobs).
×
×
  • Create New...