Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade deadline


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

No, you're ignoring the basic message that I've circled back to time and time again for pedantic reasons to try and 'win' an argument without actually addressing the point. It's annoying, it's some nerd poo. The Panthers could have had a quarterback prospect had they actually had tried to acquire draft capital and looked beyond the current regular season. They did not, instead they traded capital to win a nominal number of games.

You still don't want to address it or anyone that's relating to it. You've torpedoed the entire thread with this bullshit.

I dont think anyone has particpated to our back and forth in this thread, so I can't agree it has torpedo'd. Also, i dont think you circled back to any message, this is actually the most you typed about your origninal convo in our entire debate.

 

Now that you have gottent this off your chest..... which QB should we have built capital and traded for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

I dont think anyone has particpated to our back and forth in this thread, so I can't agree it has torpedo'd. Also, i dont think you circled back to any message, this is actually the most you typed about your origninal convo in our entire debate.

 

Now that you have gottent this off your chest..... which QB should we have built capital and traded for?

I just stated it again in the previous message, and now you're pivoting to another argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know if it's already been posted, but Glazer tweeted that FOs around the league will start calling us to see what's available as they suspect we will want to maximize draft picks and assets moving forward with a rebuild.  I don't agree with this approach, but I could understand it with someone like CMC or Robby because of their contracts, them bring able to help a contender, and the likelihood that they won't be here very long after this season anyway. Anyone other than that, I'm not really looking to move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

Don't know if it's already been posted, but Glazer tweeted that FOs around the league will start calling us to see what's available as they suspect we will want to maximize draft picks and assets moving forward with a rebuild.  I don't agree with this approach, but I could understand it with someone like CMC or Robby because of their contracts, them bring able to help a contender, and the likelihood that they won't be here very long after this season anyway. Anyone other than that, I'm not really looking to move.

as @Toomershas explained to me trading both would take some serious gymnastics in regards to our cap.  Hopefully he can in here and let us know how it could work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

as @Toomershas explained to me trading both would take some serious gymnastics in regards to our cap.  Hopefully he can in here and let us know how it could work

yea we only have a few tradeable assets. Luckily there are very few players that are "we have to trade these players or we are fuged" type of scenarios. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

nevermind then, It's obvious you don't want to have a constructive conversation. Noted.The Big Lebowski Whatever GIF

I don't have to have a "constructive conservation" as I've already made my main statement. It's there, if you think what you're doing to poke holes in my opinion is worth it, it's up to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

conversation* 

thanks for calling out my typo.

See this is what I'm saying. Some nerd poo. You're wasting my time with checking a notification, and everyone else's, reading a post that has nothing to do with anything, all because you want a win. Woohoo, you got me on a autocorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...