Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What about Fritterer?


Waldo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Hiring an outside consultant isn't going to change the perception around the league that Tepper is a sh-tty boss.

Honestly, neither are press conferences like he gave yesterday but hey...

What NFL owner isn't a shitty boss behind the scenes? I'll wait. Tepper is already seen that way I would guess. Spilt milk and all that. 

Maybe it is the ghost of keeping Hurney and where that led but I am fine with Friterer having to earn his spot next year. There isn't an employee in house that I think shouldn't at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Waldo said:

What NFL owner isn't a shitty boss behind the scenes? I'll wait. Tepper is already seen that way I would guess. Spilt milk and all that. 

Maybe it is the ghost of keeping Hurney and where that led but I am fine with Friterer having to earn his spot next year. There isn't an employee in house that I think shouldn't at this point. 

Off the top of my head, the Rooneys, the Maras, Tisch...hell, if you weren't a hot chick, people loved working for Jerry Richardson.

(I'm sure there's others I'm forgetting)

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Off the top of my head, the Rooneys, the Maras, Tisch...hell, if you weren't a hot chick, people loved working for Jerry Richardson.

(I'm sure there's others I'm forgetting)

So less then 10%? Well it isn't all I will grant you that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

That might be a bit too literal.

He said Rhule directed the "annual QB chase", which could mean he told his people he wanted en experienced QB and not to go the rookie route.  Maybe he directed his people to find options and his people (Fitt and Morgan) came up with Darnold and maybe some others.  Maybe of those options Rhule decided on his own which one.

Or maybe he did micromanage the heck out of it and he came up with Darnold all on his own and Fitt actually thought it was a good idea and didn't oppose it. 

Really as fans it's hard for us to know for sure.

 

Personally I really want to like Fitterer.  Just as fan's its really hard for us to critique him because we don't know how much he was responsible for the good and bad hires.  

Fact is we almost have to trust Tepper to make the right decision on him.

 

This is spot on where I am with Fitterer, and it seems to drive some people crazy. 

We simply don't know 1) who made or drove what decisions, 2) whether Fitterer could walk away from a deal for somebody Rhule wanted, or was he limited to just trying to get the best deal possible (think Darnold), 3) if the division of responsibility ever changed and if so, when (so you can figure out who drove what decisions), 4) what Rhule told Fitterer the dynamic between the two would be vs. what it wound up being.  In other words, if the carrot to get him to sign on was they would talk it through until they agreed, and in practice Rhule ended the talks with he was guy in charge of personnel decisions, that is a pretty big difference. 

We don't know those things, but we know who does: Tepper.  While Tepper's decision making for an NFL team is not ranked very high on my list, I have to defer to him on this because of the fact he does know the things that we do not.

Just saying Fitterer signed into this relationship is all fine and well, but he still did not sign on to be held accountable for things that were not his job.  They should have been his job, but they weren't.  That part is on Tepper.

Scot is correct, firing him for decisions that he had no voice in and had no choice but to implement (If that was the case) will be noticed.  Every few years we see a team that has to dumpster dive for a HC or GM because nobody remotely good will talk to them.  The most recent one was the 49ers after they chased Harbaugh out.  Mr. Dunkin Donuts 2015 (Tomsula) was not their first choice, he was their last resort.  Then, when he failed, their only option was Chip Kelly.  

We could be next.  All Tepper has to do is continue to follow his instincts. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

This is spot on where I am with Fitterer, and it seems to drive some people crazy. 

We simply don't know 1) who made or drove what decisions, 2) whether Fitterer could walk away from a deal for somebody Rhule wanted, or was he limited to just trying to get the best deal possible (think Darnold), 3) if the division of responsibility ever changed and if so, when (so you can figure out who drove what decisions), 4) what Rhule told Fitterer the dynamic between the two would be vs. what it wound up being.  In other words, if the carrot to get him to sign on was they would talk it through until they agreed, and in practice Rhule ended the talks with he was guy in charge of personnel decisions, that is a pretty big difference. 

We don't know those things, but we know who does: Tepper.  While Tepper's decision making for an NFL team is not ranked very high on my list, I have to defer to him on this because of the fact he does know the things that we do not.

Just saying Fitterer signed into this relationship is all fine and well, but he still did not sign on to be held accountable for things that were not his job.  They should have been his job, but they weren't.  That part is on Tepper.

Scot is correct, firing him for decisions that he had no voice in and had no choice but to implement (If that was the case) will be noticed.  Every few years we see a team that has to dumpster dive for a HC or GM because nobody remotely good will talk to them.  The most recent one was the 49ers after they chased Harbaugh out.  Mr. Dunkin Donuts 2015 (Tomsula) was not their first choice, he was their last resort.  Then, when he failed, their only option was Chip Kelly.  

We could be next.  All Tepper has to do is continue to follow his instincts. 

That's a big concern for me.

Tepper is already in the conversation for worst owner in the league when it comes to both results (horrible win-loss record) and intelligence (the sheer stupidity of what he gave Rhule)

About the only positive he might still have to offer would be making the Panthers a great place to work, but it sounds like that might already be out the window too.

I really don't want to see us become the kind of long-term laughingstock we've seen some other teams be, but I fear we're headed in that direction if things don't change.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me theres some bad and more good thus far. We do not know what % of role he played in Darnold. Roast away with your 20/20, but the baker trade was still a smart move at the time.......results have baker in the outhouse tho. 

 

I will say this in his defense, maybe the main role of the GM is to supply the coaching staff with a certain type of player. I believe Finesserererer did a great job across the whole team. 

 

Ive truly liked each draft and how each was totally different in the manner it played out, * on the drafted days, I loved the results. Still a little earlier on most, but results are not the same 10/10 feelings

 

I hated his first FA haul, with elf and erv. Guess who was also in that trash group- Frankie Luvu....Much better the next round with Morgan helping. This group could have been saved if they kept reddick around....

 

 Personally I could be talked into either way. Would not complain if fired and have an interest in who he'd pick as HC/staff. Force me to vote, I'd give him the real shot at hiring "his" coach. Fail? Shitcann the whole org and start fresh. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Waldo said:

That situation was the one he was prepared for by being in a similar organization up in Seattle where the HC rules all, that was why Rhule wanted him. He fit that mold and would operate in that kind of system. Saying it's not fair he doesn't get a shot at a job type he wasn't hired for or have much experience with is a bit misleading. He was never a final say GM so just giving it to him is a complete shot in the dark when we could hire GM prospect trained in that kind of environment. 

He had his fair shot when he decided to sign on to a mess. It stinks but he did say yes to being a GM on a leash and to Rhule of all coaches. No one can downplay his decision there. 

I'm OK with seeing how he handles the rest of this year and him earning his job next year but no one owes him a damn thing he doesn't earn going forward. The season is still long from finished and all these guys have to play nice with each other while facing an uphill battle for wins. 

I think at the end of the season Fitts and other candidates can interview for the GM position. Let the best and most qualified person win.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

I think at the end of the season Fitts and other candidates can interview for the GM position. Let the best and most qualified person win.

I hate to ask this, but since we are fairly fresh off some other "competitions," who is going to judge the "best and most qualified?"

Here's my concern: I don't think Tepper knows the difference.  He has already been the victim of one scam.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

I think at the end of the season Fitts and other candidates can interview for the GM position. Let the best and most qualified person win.

Fine but it has to be a real hiring process which means Tepper brings in outside help. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sgt Schultz said:

I hate to ask this, but since we are fairly fresh off some other "competitions," who is going to judge the "best and most qualified?"

Here's my concern: I don't think Tepper knows the difference.  He has already been the victim of one scam.

Tepper said he was open to a consultant or maybe Morgan. I just think we need to wipe away the entire Rhule stench and I pretty sure he's the one that chose Fitt. It's a real mess for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

I really don't want to see us become the kind of long-term laughingstock we've seen some other teams be, but I fear we're headed in that direction if things don't change.

Think we are sadly already there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Think we are sadly already there. 

We could be close.  The only thing that will save us is there will be more coaches fired and other organizations that look like a bunch of buffoons. 

For example, when Rivera gets the axe in DC, I don't think people will be lining up to work for the Dan Snyder-led Foreskins.  Hell, he may have to hire Rhule.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

We could be close.  The only thing that will save us is there will be more coaches fired and other organizations that look like a bunch of buffoons. 

For example, when Rivera gets the axe in DC, I don't think people will be lining up to work for the Dan Snyder-led Foreskins.  Hell, he may have to hire Rhule.

I think we were already there entering this year, locked in once Tepper retained Rhule.

If Tepper hires a good consultant to help fix the issues and set a new tone then that changes. I don't see anyone in house good to lean on and I don't see Tepper being able to do anything solo in the near future. One good hand to help the process would change lots of perception. Staying the course would just be more of the same. Tepper can't not hire a consultant to help clean up the mess he made with Rhule. He needs help on every angle and there are a lot of turds in the punchbowl left after Hurney and Rhule to sort through.

Who knows what went on behind the scenes but from the dysfunction we can all see it was more than we factually know at this time.  

I would love to see Rhule with Snyder. Just a perfect match. 

Edited by Waldo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

I think at the end of the season Fitts and other candidates can interview for the GM position. Let the best and most qualified person win.

Pretty sure no team has ever forced a sitting coach or GM to interview for their own job.

Also pretty sure that if we did, we'd quickly be even more of a laughingstock than we are already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exhibit A of why Woods was cut....   Trying to shoulder knockdown the best WR in the NFL ends up with air   Also not sure what the h*ll coverage Horn was playing but covering nothibg after a poo jam 
    • I'm just telling you what the team is currently looking at. Aho, Jarvis, Staal, KK as the four centers in that order as of right now.  Obviously id prefer them to go get McTavish but the asking price is pretty damn high. 
    • Summary Austin Corbett being named a starter already might be strategic because it allows the team to have Cade Mays compete to play LG if Damien Lewis continues to have shoulder issues going into the season. Brady Christensen is most valuable to the team as the sixth-man/swing tackle for the OL and having him start a game at guard only to have to kick out to tackle (should there be an injury) is less than ideal. Was the weakest link on the OL when he was the starting LG and though he has short arms he is too athletic and so good in space that playing him at tackle is better. RT makes more sense as it's brawn-on-brawn more than it is on the weakside where somebody like Princely Umanmielen can out-athletic him. Cade Mays provides similar versatility that Christensen does, but can stick to the interior while Brady stays on the outside (unless, Lord forbid, there's multiple injuries that requires Mays + Christensen on the interior and Nijman to takeover at OT). Kaye thinks that the only keep two QBs on the roster and while he's seen some of the angst that Andy Dalton caused from the preseason opener but through the first two weeks of training camp he looked like he could be in the conversation if there was a competition for QB1. Not because of any lacking one Bryce's behalf, but just based on the great looks he's given the second-team defense. He's lofted balls into the endzone including a big TD to Coker. Also threw about 45yds through the air to TJ Luther for a TD. Zietlow empathizes with the fans because they can't see anything from training camp. Mike has the team keeping three RBs with Raheem Blackshear as the odd-man out with Etienne set to take over as one of the two returners. Former Ragin' Cajun and Horned Frog Emani Bailey has looked good running the ball in the last couple of practices as well as during the preseason opener. Likely priority practice squad candidate. Thinks that the team should only keep six WRs in order to take an extra OL or DL into the season, but summoning his inner Eric Eager Kaye doesn't see how they justify not keeping seven WRs without a trade. Doesn't think if it's a failure if a trade can't come to fruition to move that seventh WR if they do that. Loves what he's seeing out of McMillan, Coker, and Legette. TMac is starting to surge and Jimmy Horn Jr might be the lead punt returner. With the team being so light on quality special teams players, David Moore might be somebody that they can cut and bring back. All of the WRs further down the roster are also making plays (lists Tremayne, Luther, and George). Alex likes their initial numbers: two QBs, three RBs, and seven WRs. Mike points out that with seven WRs there's no way the team takes four TEs. Will Tremble be healthy and if not who makes the roster while he recovers? James Mitchell has looked good and like it might be him if that's the route. Poses the question of do they take 10 OL? Probably going to have eight active on game day but with DLew's injury, TMo's history, Hunt getting dinged up recently in practice, Corbett's back-to-back season ending injuries creates a legitimate conversation about whether or not they go into the season with ten OL and then try to stash one on the practice squad afterwards. Couple of minutes of debate over the classification of the word hero... Don't have LaBryan Ray, Shy Tuttle, nor Akayleb Evans on their final 53. Quick intermission as they bring on The Houston Chronicle's Jonathan Alexander (formerly of The Charlotte Observer where he was once the Panthers' beat reporter). JA thinks that some of the critique of CJ's game last season was overblown but also understands that folks want to see growth from year one to year two rather than regression but he still had some good moments. Still had a decent TD:INT ratio (20:12) and was listed at #39 in the recent NFL Top 100. Texans were dealing with a lot of injuries early in the summer: Joe Mixon has a foot issue from an off-field injury, Nick Chubb is returning from a season ending injury and recently came back from a concussion as well, Dameon Pierce who is coming back from a quad injury and just recently practiced in full for the first time, Dare Ogunbowale is their do-it-all guy (including emergency kicker), and they drafted Woody Marks out of USC in the 4th round of the 2025 draft. The team might even try to sneak five RBs on to the roster. Chubb isn't a guarantee to make the roster with how much they like Pierce, Dare, and recently invested a 4th in Marks. Talked issues in the secondary after CJGJ's injury and Jimmie Ward's felony assault charge. CJGJ injury was really tough even though he'll come back at some point during the season. Stingley and Lassiter provides them with two lockdown outside CBs. Kaylin Bulock is a ball hawk that struggles in the run game but Jaylen Petri is one of the best hitters/blitzers at the nickel position in the league (though he gives up some in the pass game). They're still going to be strong in the secondary even without CJGJ. DL is one of the best in the league. Will Anderson Jr and Danielle Hunter on the outside with a deeper DT room. DL + secondary are the strongest areas of the defense. Houston WR room has a lot of names that even casual football fans know of (Nico Collins, Christian Kirk, Tank Dell, John Metchie III, Braxton Berrios, both of the Iowa State WRs, etc). Main four are Collins, Kirk, Higgins (Iowa St), and Noel (Iowa St). Open competition for the remaining two to three spots depending on what Berrios has done since coming back from injury. If Berrios is good to go, they could keep seven. John Metchie III, Xavier Hutchinson (a former Iowa St WR himself), and Justin Watson (former Chief) are all competing for those remaining spots with Berrios. Rookie contract guarantees have been getting deeper and deeper every year, so when Higgins was drafted the Texans didn't want to deal with the back-and-forth so they just guaranteed the full deal. Asked about what the external view of Bryce Young is outside of the Carolinas. Jonathan says that the league respects Bryce and the Texans do especially. CJ and him are close, Will Anderson is close with Bryce, Henry Too'too is close with Bryce, Metchie is close with Bryce. Whenever they're asked about him they show nothing but love, including saying that he was going to turn things around in Carolina. Folks around the organization and others outside of Carolina around the league feel like the Panthers didn't put the necessary tools around Bryce in his rookie season. They gave him the tools in his second season, but it was all about his confidence then. They think he's going to be one of the better QBs in the league for a long time. End of Jonathan's segment. Back to just Mike and Alex. Roster bets! Can't be guys that you know are going to be on the roster or win jobs. Outside of the kicker competition there isn't too many positions up in the air. Of the guys in the 45 - 55 range, stake their claim on who they think will make the roster. MK starts with Jaden Crumedy, last year's sixth-round pick. Likes what he's been doing in the run game, feels like he complements DB well. A'Shawn Robinson is complemented by Turk Wharton and Bobby Brown III is complemented by Cam Jackson. AZ points out how Crumedy played in five different defensive schemes in college. AZ goes with Ja'Tyre Carter. He had a solid rest of the game after giving up his initial sack which wasn't exactly egregious. This training camp has shown how important OL depth is and with how much has been invested they're going to want to make sure to keep the strength a strength (especially with three of the five starters already dinged up). Could make the roster as OL10. He's serviceable and part of a group that needs as much depth as possible, so sees the logic in keeping him. MK's next pick... Thomas Incoom. He's been terrific at practice on defense and was solid against the Browns on special teams. Doesn't see why DJ Johnson would be kept over Incoom as the latter is a better pass rusher and a much, much better ST contributor (doesn't hurt that he's outperformed DJ Johnson in every which way). Pointed out a play where DJ Johnson froze up on a reverse when he's supposed to be a good run defender. They've put a lot in and while Evero was pro-DJ Johnson, he was ultimately a selection of the previous regime. Pointed out Brandt Tillis' comments about not cutting Turk Wharton because it would lose the team trying to stash him rather than fielding the best 53 players. Morgan + Tillis don't benefit from storing a player that they didn't draft, and Incoom brings so much on special teams while also providing a pass rush despite needing to improve against the run. AZ's pick... Nick Scott. Both agree that he's a special teamer and a back-up, but Scott also brings a legitimate leadership quality to the team that's well-liked by everybody. Both agree that Ransom and Richardson deserve reps over Nick Scott, but he provides a great locker room presence that benefits the team. If he can be the defense's version of David Moore then he provides even more value than he does as a starter. Ransom has been one of the best defensive players in camp and Richardson showed that he is a very capable defensive player at safety. End.
×
×
  • Create New...