Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL: Snyder says league "can't ---- with me" because he has dirt


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

He does claim he has dirt on Goodell and many owners. He seems to think he can shake the league up by attempting to get back at them for all the supposed wrongs that were done to him in his eyes.

If you're part of a cooperative group though, do you wanna work with that guy?

For the NFL to function, they kind of need the teams to be at least reasonably civil to each other.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

One thing is for sure. The idea that the NFL forced Richardson to sell is certainly not true.

Not exactly...

It is true that he initially volunteered to sell the team himself after the NFL made it clear that they weren't going to let him cover up the scandal using his "internal investigation" idea.

But down the road, when he was walking around muttering about how he didn't have to sell the team if he didn't want to, the NFL basically said "no take backs".

They weren't about to allow him to back out of that process once the ball got rolling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mav1234 said:

I think there's a bit of wishful thinking here... I suspect the dirt is personal indescretions and not fixing a Superbowl so the Panthers would lose... 

Yea it will most likely similar to what got Gruden banished.
 

However, how sweet would it be if it involved the panthers Super Bowl. I wouldn’t care if the league folds if I was able to see the fallout from something like that.

Edited by firefox1234
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...