Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Person analyzes Rhule's time as Panthers coach


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Like clockwork.

Capturasde.JPG

lol.  Talk about clockwork.

Go read the article again.  It’s a legit point someone else shared of what a joke HC Matt Rhule was.  

I mean, just take the L on how wrong you have been about all this stuff and move on. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

lol.  Talk about clockwork.

Go read the article again.  It’s a legit point someone else shared of what a joke HC Matt Rhule was.  

I mean, just take the L on how wrong you have been about all this stuff and move on. 

I read it.  Rhule is what his record says he is, a sucky nfl coach.  Sorry I hoped he would win games.

As for poor Joe Brady, who was strung along for a whole week.  An  extra week of prep for Nixon would not have won another game.  It just wouldn't.  The mistake was hiring the green Brady.  The correct action was firing him.

As for predictions, your prediction record is pretty weak.  Case in point.

 

Capturasde.JPG.602a85c7332f8c29060087eda7fba956.JPG

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AggieLean said:

This is probably what Cam was speaking to when he made his comments after his last season in Carolina. He said something like he didn’t recognize the team anymore. 

Honestly I don't want to recognise the team anymore.

Whoever the new HC is next year has to completely revamp the culture of this organisation. The odd good season sprinkled into multiple losing ones is not good enough.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthera onca said:

I still can’t really believe Tepper hired this fraudulent college hype man to coach and run our beloved pro football team.

He'll undoubtedly go and have more success in College.

His skillset didn't translate to the pros - I wouldn't call him a fraudulent hype man though. Not unless you think Nick Saban is the same.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, poundaway said:

 

As for poor Joe Brady, who was strung along for a whole week.  An  extra week of prep for Nixon would not have won another game.  It just wouldn't.  The mistake was hiring the green Brady.  The correct action was firing him.

As for predictions, your prediction record is pretty weak.  Case in point.

The actual mistake was hiring Matt Rhule.   Matt Rhule again remains the actual topic. 

Would it be smarter to give Nixon 2 weeks to prep for a bad Atl team or just give him 1?  That's the discussion. 

My guessing of the actions of a bad football coach in Matt Rhule isn't great.  Only thing worse is your prediction of how this season, Matt Rhule, Ben McAdoo, etc. would play out. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, poundaway said:

But just writing that would make for a very short article.

What was your record prediction for the year?  What were your game predictions again?

 

I'm sure there are variations of it as much as a BS around here.   Largely I think I laid out thoughts they could get somewhere between 4 to 7 wins before the season started. 

I largely had after the Tampa Bay game as where and when I think Rhule would get the axe.   

I had a bold prediction that Wilks or Tabor might pull of more wins than Rhule lol.  Which has a chance. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I'm sure there are variations of it as much as a BS around here.   Largely I think I laid out thoughts they could get somewhere between 4 to 7 wins before the season started. 

I largely had after the Tampa Bay game as where and when I think Rhule would get the axe.   

I had a bold prediction that Wilks or Tabor might pull of more wins than Rhule lol.  Which has a chance. 

Wilks should get more wins than Rhule, he has a lot more games with some bad teams left on the schedule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, poundaway said:

Wilks should get more wins than Rhule, he has a lot more games with some bad teams left on the schedule. 

we will see, I mean McAdoo hasn't been exactly what I thought he would be.  It has been worse.  We are going to have to see something different from him.  Maybe Wilks can get it.  I do believe Rhule's thumbprint/micromanagement brought out the worst in folks.  I suspect we will find out pretty quick if that is realistic or not. 

But if we don't see change from the O.....it's hard to see wins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...