Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jonathan Jones looks at Tepper and Wilks

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Panthercougar68 Grand Master

Panthercougar68

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The Colts job is considered a strong possibility. Arizona is becoming increasingly possible too.

Speculation that the Lions job could open up but I wouldn't bet on it. Ditto the Broncos but with a new owner, who can say Mike McCarthy could wind up on the outs also because Jerry Jones.

Beyond that, there's almost always at least one surprise firing.

Irsay is bat poo crazy with how he acts so there is always a risk with ownerships. Sean’s not coming here but he’s right with the there is no perfect situation comment.

Edited by Panthercougar68
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tbe Grand Master

Tbe

Posted
Posted

Yeah it sucks that Tepper is an A-hole, but that’s true of many owners.

Hell, the eagles won a SB with a $hit show of a front office and they are undefeated so far this year.

I think Tepper’s desire to win means he is willing to learn and change. It will probably take him a while though. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Again, year over year it gets said "x is not a desirable job, no one will take it," and year over year said team gets their top 1 or 2 choice. I'm not worried in the least, we will get a good set of coaches to choose from, we just can't screw it up.

Disagree. I've never seen anyone but some fans say nobody will take a coaching job, but I have seen it said better coaches will not take certain jobs.

Also, just because a team says they got their top 1 or 2 choice, doesn't make that true. Do you really expect them to say all the good coaches refused to take the job so we had to settle for this guy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Tbe said:

Yeah it sucks that Tepper is an A-hole, but that’s true of many owners.

Hell, the eagles won a SB with a $hit show of a front office and they are undefeated so far this year.

I think Tepper’s desire to win means he is willing to learn and change. It will probably take him a while though. 

I don't think Tepper cares about winning as much as he has claimed. This is a guy that said the NFL was designed to be a .500 league when it has always been a league of haves and have nots. That's not the sort of thing I guy that wants to win should say. It sounds like the sort of thing a guy that is fine with hovering around .500 every year so he keeps making money off the team says.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Disagree. I've never seen anyone but some fans say nobody will take a coaching job, but I have seen it said better coaches will not take certain jobs.

Also, just because a team says they got their top 1 or 2 choice, doesn't make that true. Do you really expect them to say all the good coaches refused to take the job so we had to settle for this guy?

It's not like this hasn't already happened to us.

Ed Dodds was considered one of the better candidates for our GM job. Right after he interviewed, he dropped out of the search.

We can theorize that was because of Matt Rhule, but who's to say there wasn't more to it than just that?

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's not like this hasn't already happened to us.

Ed Dodds was considered one of the better candidates for our GM job. Right after he interviewed, he dropped out of the search.

We can theorize that was because of Matt Rhule, but who's to say there wasn't more to it than just that?

It's not the NFL, but there was also the guy the Hornets were going to hire as coach that backed out after getting the job and staying as a Golden State assistant instead. The Hornets settled on repeating the Steve Clifford show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tbe Grand Master

Tbe

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

I don't think Tepper cares about winning as much as he has claimed. This is a guy that said the NFL was designed to be a .500 league when it has always been a league of haves and have nots. That's not the sort of thing I guy that wants to win should say. It sounds like the sort of thing a guy that is fine with hovering around .500 every year so he keeps making money off the team says.


I don’t buy the whole ‘he just wants to make money’ thing. 

This is a guy who made 10 billion in just one year once. He could make a lot more by selling the team and focusing on trading again.

He does want to win. He was just acknowledging reality. He said that because he was saying the only way to consistently win is to have a consistent advantage. Which is true.

The guy has only ever won in his life so far. He wants to win he just doesn’t know how yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Tbe said:


I don’t buy the whole ‘he just wants to make money’ thing. 

This is a guy who made 10 billion in just one year once. He could make a lot more by selling the team and focusing on trading again.

He does want to win. He was just acknowledging reality. He said that because he was saying the only way to consistently win is to have a consistent advantage. Which is true.

The guy has only ever won in his life so far. He wants to win he just doesn’t know how yet.

He was a minority owner of the Steelers for years. If he didn't take notes and learn while there, he won't learn on his own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
11 minutes ago, Tbe said:


I don’t buy the whole ‘he just wants to make money’ thing. 

This is a guy who made 10 billion in just one year once. He could make a lot more by selling the team and focusing on trading again.

He does want to win. He was just acknowledging reality. He said that because he was saying the only way to consistently win is to have a consistent advantage. Which is true.

The guy has only ever won in his life so far. He wants to win he just doesn’t know how yet.

I never bought the idea that Jerry Richardson didn’t care about winning. Like Tepper, he just didn’t know how.

What’s most unfortunate is Tepper’s biggest issue is the same as Richardson’s. He trusts the wrong people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tbe Grand Master

Tbe

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I never bought the idea that Jerry Richardson didn’t care about winning. Like Tepper, he just didn’t know how.

What’s most unfortunate is Tepper’s biggest issue is the same as Richardson’s. He trusts the wrong people.

Jerry had a better idea of how to win. He just hung onto players and staff he loved too long. 

He was also a bit cheap.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, jayboogieman said:

I don't think Tepper cares about winning as much as he has claimed. This is a guy that said the NFL was designed to be a .500 league when it has always been a league of haves and have nots. That's not the sort of thing I guy that wants to win should say. It sounds like the sort of thing a guy that is fine with hovering around .500 every year so he keeps making money off the team says.

He does want the team to win but all the things we've seen to this point signal he can't get out of his own way and that just isn't going to change knowing how he has been in business all his life. The only thing that would make me feel better about the long term prospects of this franchise is if he hires a consultant and let's someone else take the reigns this go around. But I do not see that happening based on his personality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trueblade Grand Master

trueblade

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Panthercougar68 said:

What other coaching spots are actually gonna be open this offseason? Half the NFL had a new coach within the last 2 years.

Washington and Houston?

 

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

The Colts job is considered a strong possibility. Arizona is becoming increasingly possible too.

Speculation that the Lions job could open up but I wouldn't bet on it. Ditto the Broncos but with a new owner, who can say? Mike McCarthy could wind up on the outs also because Jerry Jones.

Beyond that, there's almost always at least one surprise firing.

I'd keep an eye on LA (Chargers). I know they just won so everything is all sunshine and rainbows, but he's not getting the most out of his talent, and even in a win last week, he made a questionable call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      The Ringer NFC Offseason podcast

      By frankw · Posted

      The division is most certainly wide open. The Bucs are a problem but Baker Mayfield is and will remain his own worst enemy it's a matter of when not if he has a bad game or even a stretch of bad games. As far as the Panthers they have done an admirable job of trying to address needs as best they can without pulling a Scott Fitterer and getting desperate which has only made us worse off in the past. On the Bryce subject all anyone can really say at this point is we just have to wait and see. This is the year and despite what the Panthers may say publicly doubling down and going all in on WR is as good as any sign anyone should need that they expect Bryce Young to have a very productive and convincing season. The pieces are in place. They aren't perfect but nothing ever will be. Regardless there's honestly no excuse for this staff and this team not to be able to compete in this iteration of the NFC South. Also just want to say this because I can say the hyper defensive posts already being made in here and it's probably going to be a season with highs and lows again but hopefully more highs for sure. But just because there is dialogue about a position group or a player that challenges your preconceived notions or makes you uncomfortable does not make it "hate" or "anti" this player or that player. For some people who talk a lot about nuance you would think this wouldn't need to be stated but that's where we're at. 
    • BEASTfromdaEAST
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By BEASTfromdaEAST · Posted

      If I was a coach I would preach "Don't let the refs decide the game" because as soon as you let the NFL the chance to help their bottom dollar whether it be teams that make most money or gambling then they will screw the team that doesn't fit their bottom line......is it rigged? No but do they try and make certain narratives happen abso-freakin-lutley. As I stated in a previous thread NFL players are the ones that SHOULD have all guaranteed contracts but the boot lickers on this forum disagree and argue for the billionaires in this world who own these teams, sheep
    • HaricotVert
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I wont go quite so far as to say games are rigged.  You wouldnt have to work hard to convince me there was the occasional thumb on the scale but outright rigged? nah.   but collusion on the rest of the "business" of football, sure.  No one really believes that the only time the 32 owners act as one is during the negotiations of the CBA do they?
×
×
  • Create New...