Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Games


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Josh Allen is a totally different player.  No real comparison at all to me.

Josh Allen was a big armed athlete in college. He was wildly inaccurate. They're the same guy to my eyes and I watched quite a few of Allen's games at Wyoming living in CO at the time. They were always on TV for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Josh Allen was a big armed athlete in college. He was wildly inaccurate. They're the same guy toy eyes and I watched quite a few of Allen's games at Wyoming living in CO at the time. They were always on TV for me.

That’s fine and maybe Richardson can develop but he is extremely inaccurate like for whole games.  The athleticism is awesome but he has a long way to go passing.  He needs to stay another year

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Clemson is probably more on the tier with Penn State, FSU, Auburn. And yes Clemson has had a nice run the past decade. They weren’t anything special pre Dabo and their success in the 80s was due to massive amounts of cheating 

I mean, it depends how you choose to look at it….I mean you want to go back 40 years to talk about present day college football?  That’s not how I am doing it.    No recruit gives a fug about the 80s.  

Clemson is and has been a top tier program in the college football playoff era.  Only behind Bama.   

I break it down by eras.  NIL era is the next one coming up IMO.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shocker said:

That’s fine and maybe Richardson can develop but he is extremely inaccurate like for whole games.  The athleticism is awesome but he has a long way to go passing.  He needs to stay another year

I don't disagree. I'm just saying Josh Allen looked the exact same and look at him now. 

I've said repeatedly that I've never seen any QB develop as much as a pure passer as Josh Allen has in the NFL. I can't even think of a remotely close second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I still think Richardson is the most talented of the draft eligible QBs. I just don't know that I'm willing to bet on him making a Josh Allen type leap. That seems like asking lightning to strike twice. But honestly they look virtually identical to me as college QBs.

I haven't caught any of Bryce Young but yeah rough day for the draft QB's. At this point if we're 3 I'd take Will Anderson and then maybe keep an eye on Anthony Richardson for pick 2 if he's there. Either way I think we'll have to stick with 3 qb's through last cuts at the least. None of these guys are showing we should just dump Corral off especially when he's technically costing us a 3rd this year. Not sure if he's worth trading away either, he's had a good attitude to the whole fuged situation he was put in so that's worth something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't disagree. I'm just saying Josh Allen looked the exact same and look at him now. 

I've said repeatedly that I've never seen any QB develop as much as a pure passer as Josh Allen has in the NFL. I can't even think of a remotely close second.

He is an anomaly…that doesn’t happen much.  I think he probably has the biggest arm I have ever seen.  Amazing

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I haven't caught any of Bryce Young but yeah rough day for the draft QB's. At this point if we're 3 I'd take Will Anderson and then maybe keep an eye on Anthony Richardson for pick 2 if he's there. Either way I think we'll have to stick with 3 qb's through last cuts at the least. None of these guys are showing we should just dump Corral off especially when he's technically costing us a 3rd this year. Not sure if he's worth trading away either, he's had a good attitude to the whole fuged situation he was put in so that's worth something

I'm not opposed to trading out of that spot and amassing stupid draft capital unless you're certain Anderson is a sure fire HOFer.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, it depends how you choose to look at it….I mean you want to go back 40 years to talk about present day college football?  That’s not how I am doing it.    No recruit gives a fug about the 80s.  

Clemson is and has been a top tier program in the college football playoff era.  Only behind Bama.   

I break it down by eras.  NIL era is the next one coming up IMO.  

 

I know Nebraska is considered a blue blood and they have been irrelevant for three decades. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, davos said:

Gotta be honest, really not feeling Anderson. This LT is working him most of the time. Big lack of power.

I honestly feel the same. I think he's a really good prospect. I don't think he's the type of prospect you pass on QBs or a massive haul of picks to draft though.

I think I'm leaning hard toward the trade down direction of the opportunity presents itself.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...