Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Justin Fields 61 yard rushing touchdown


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Outperformed him by leading his franchise to a top pick? Outperformed him with less total yards? What are you using as a measurement for “outperforming.” 
Also Mills was a 3rd round pick…

Mills has more TD, more yards, better passer rating with way less talent on a team that has been purposely tanking for two straight offseason.

 

I don’t think Mills is any good but facts are facts. Btw while you are bragging about Fields stats he was getting blown out by the cowboys so, the bears are also on pace to have a top 10 pick. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Catsfan69 said:

Mobile QBs do.

Dual threat don't 

I can list tons of mobile qbs in history that have won. Mobile QB is where the sweet spot is.

ah yes; this was it, your moronic semantics in which QBs who run for hundreds of yards as part of the total package of what they offer are reclassified depending on whether or not they won a super bowl or merely willed their team into attending it but were just too “dual threat” to be a winner 

like lol

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Growl said:

ah yes; this was it, your moronic semantics in which QBs who run for hundreds of yards as part of the total package of what they offer are reclassified depending on whether or not they won a super bowl or merely willed their team into attending it but were just too “dual threat” to be a winner 

like lol

No it's about ability to win only with your arm.

And run when only necessary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

I was talking about career stats……

this is why you don’t interject into conversation.

 

Why if we are judging them as they are at present. They were all in awful situations last year. And could you point out where you specified career stats. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Catsfan69 said:

No it's about ability to win only with your arm.

And run when only necessary. 

lol this argument has already been deconstructed to you multiple times, it’s embarrassing watching you cling to it, preserve some dignity 

your dumb personal standard of what constitutes good play is a discarded relic, no longer do teams seek the kind of player you’re looking for, not only is your argument already wrong as QBs that have amassed hundreds of rush yards over the course of a season have already played in and won Super Bowls, very soon there literally won’t be any refuge for you to hide in because the only kinds of QBs comprising playoff rosters are the mobile ones you hate so much 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GoobyPls said:

Mills has more TD, more yards, better passer rating with way less talent on a team that has been purposely tanking for two straight offseason.

 

I don’t think Mills is any good but facts are facts. Btw while you are bragging about Fields stats he was getting blown out by the cowboys so, the bears are also on pace to have a top 10 pick. Lol

You are comparing cumulative stats with a player who has played more games. 😂😂 That’s not how it works at all.  
Cooks would be the best weapon Fields has had in his NFL career. Pierce is solid too. Tunsil is also a legit LT. 3 wins is better than 1, you understand that right?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Growl said:

lol this argument has already been deconstructed to you multiple times, it’s embarrassing watching you cling to it, preserve some dignity 

your dumb personal standard of what constitutes good play is a discarded relic, no longer do teams seek the kind of player you’re looking for, not only is your argument already wrong as QBs that have amassed hundreds of rush yards over the course of a season have already played in and won Super Bowls, very soon there literally won’t be any refuge for you to hide in because the only kinds of QBs comprising playoff rosters are the mobile ones you hate so much 

The QBs I seek

Staubach

Russ

Big Ben

Manning

Warren Moon

Fouts

Young

Montana 

 

And on and on and on would all still be franchise guys today.

 

I'll take prime Russ Moon lamar and Mahomes over Cam any day of the week.

The number one measurement of a QB is arm and passing ability. Plain and simple.

Allen can throw

Cousins can throw

Russ traditionally can throw

Brady can throw 

Lamar can throw

Rogers can throw

Herbert Burrows can throw.

 

I want a guy that can dice you up.

Not some jag that can kinda get it in the vicinity. 

Fields is more vicinity than surgical 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

You are comparing cumulative stats with a player who has played more games. 😂😂 That’s not how it works at all.  
Cooks would be the best weapon Fields has had in his NFL career. Pierce is solid too. Tunsil is also a legit LT. 3 wins is better than 1, you understand that right?

Mills has played 21 games, Fields 20

 

And Fields had Mooney, Robinson, Kmet, Montgomery and Herbert. 
 

You are bragging about 3 wins lol, that just goes to show how bad both QBs are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Growl said:

lol this argument has already been deconstructed to you multiple times, it’s embarrassing watching you cling to it, preserve some dignity 

your dumb personal standard of what constitutes good play is a discarded relic, no longer do teams seek the kind of player you’re looking for, not only is your argument already wrong as QBs that have amassed hundreds of rush yards over the course of a season have already played in and won Super Bowls, very soon there literally won’t be any refuge for you to hide in because the only kinds of QBs comprising playoff rosters are the mobile ones you hate so much 

You don't know how to read.

Was Staubach mobile

Young

Mahomes

Yes. But it was in top of elite arms.

They won because of their arms not their legs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Why if we are judging them as they are at present. They were all in awful situations last year. And could you point out where you specified career stats. 

No we are not, I was talking about the 2021 class in totality. 
 

The fact is 3 weeks ago Fields was far and away the worst QB in the class and 3 weeks of decent football isn’t gonna change my perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...