Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Justin Fields 61 yard rushing touchdown


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Outperformed him by leading his franchise to a top pick? Outperformed him with less total yards? What are you using as a measurement for “outperforming.” 
Also Mills was a 3rd round pick…

Mills has more TD, more yards, better passer rating with way less talent on a team that has been purposely tanking for two straight offseason.

 

I don’t think Mills is any good but facts are facts. Btw while you are bragging about Fields stats he was getting blown out by the cowboys so, the bears are also on pace to have a top 10 pick. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Catsfan69 said:

Mobile QBs do.

Dual threat don't 

I can list tons of mobile qbs in history that have won. Mobile QB is where the sweet spot is.

ah yes; this was it, your moronic semantics in which QBs who run for hundreds of yards as part of the total package of what they offer are reclassified depending on whether or not they won a super bowl or merely willed their team into attending it but were just too “dual threat” to be a winner 

like lol

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Growl said:

ah yes; this was it, your moronic semantics in which QBs who run for hundreds of yards as part of the total package of what they offer are reclassified depending on whether or not they won a super bowl or merely willed their team into attending it but were just too “dual threat” to be a winner 

like lol

No it's about ability to win only with your arm.

And run when only necessary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

I was talking about career stats……

this is why you don’t interject into conversation.

 

Why if we are judging them as they are at present. They were all in awful situations last year. And could you point out where you specified career stats. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Catsfan69 said:

No it's about ability to win only with your arm.

And run when only necessary. 

lol this argument has already been deconstructed to you multiple times, it’s embarrassing watching you cling to it, preserve some dignity 

your dumb personal standard of what constitutes good play is a discarded relic, no longer do teams seek the kind of player you’re looking for, not only is your argument already wrong as QBs that have amassed hundreds of rush yards over the course of a season have already played in and won Super Bowls, very soon there literally won’t be any refuge for you to hide in because the only kinds of QBs comprising playoff rosters are the mobile ones you hate so much 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GoobyPls said:

Mills has more TD, more yards, better passer rating with way less talent on a team that has been purposely tanking for two straight offseason.

 

I don’t think Mills is any good but facts are facts. Btw while you are bragging about Fields stats he was getting blown out by the cowboys so, the bears are also on pace to have a top 10 pick. Lol

You are comparing cumulative stats with a player who has played more games. 😂😂 That’s not how it works at all.  
Cooks would be the best weapon Fields has had in his NFL career. Pierce is solid too. Tunsil is also a legit LT. 3 wins is better than 1, you understand that right?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Growl said:

lol this argument has already been deconstructed to you multiple times, it’s embarrassing watching you cling to it, preserve some dignity 

your dumb personal standard of what constitutes good play is a discarded relic, no longer do teams seek the kind of player you’re looking for, not only is your argument already wrong as QBs that have amassed hundreds of rush yards over the course of a season have already played in and won Super Bowls, very soon there literally won’t be any refuge for you to hide in because the only kinds of QBs comprising playoff rosters are the mobile ones you hate so much 

The QBs I seek

Staubach

Russ

Big Ben

Manning

Warren Moon

Fouts

Young

Montana 

 

And on and on and on would all still be franchise guys today.

 

I'll take prime Russ Moon lamar and Mahomes over Cam any day of the week.

The number one measurement of a QB is arm and passing ability. Plain and simple.

Allen can throw

Cousins can throw

Russ traditionally can throw

Brady can throw 

Lamar can throw

Rogers can throw

Herbert Burrows can throw.

 

I want a guy that can dice you up.

Not some jag that can kinda get it in the vicinity. 

Fields is more vicinity than surgical 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

You are comparing cumulative stats with a player who has played more games. 😂😂 That’s not how it works at all.  
Cooks would be the best weapon Fields has had in his NFL career. Pierce is solid too. Tunsil is also a legit LT. 3 wins is better than 1, you understand that right?

Mills has played 21 games, Fields 20

 

And Fields had Mooney, Robinson, Kmet, Montgomery and Herbert. 
 

You are bragging about 3 wins lol, that just goes to show how bad both QBs are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Growl said:

lol this argument has already been deconstructed to you multiple times, it’s embarrassing watching you cling to it, preserve some dignity 

your dumb personal standard of what constitutes good play is a discarded relic, no longer do teams seek the kind of player you’re looking for, not only is your argument already wrong as QBs that have amassed hundreds of rush yards over the course of a season have already played in and won Super Bowls, very soon there literally won’t be any refuge for you to hide in because the only kinds of QBs comprising playoff rosters are the mobile ones you hate so much 

You don't know how to read.

Was Staubach mobile

Young

Mahomes

Yes. But it was in top of elite arms.

They won because of their arms not their legs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Why if we are judging them as they are at present. They were all in awful situations last year. And could you point out where you specified career stats. 

No we are not, I was talking about the 2021 class in totality. 
 

The fact is 3 weeks ago Fields was far and away the worst QB in the class and 3 weeks of decent football isn’t gonna change my perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...