Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College BBall 2022


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

ouch…

Davis' new deal, which he signed in August, is slated to run through the 2027-28 season and will pay him close to $2.8 million annually, starting at $2.3 million for the 2022-23 season and rising to $3.1 million by the final year. Davis could also earn roughly $1.1 million per season in performance bonuses.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Shocker said:

Watching these other conferences championship games today.  The ACC does suck badly.  These teams are light years better.  Duke will not be making any type of run

Other teams are better, but Duke could make a run. They've gotten hot and more importantly, healthy, at the right time. I can't think of his name, but the tall white guy might make MJ want him ala Frank, Zeller, Mullins, if Duke has a good tourney run.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jayboogieman said:

Other teams are better, but Duke could make a run. They've gotten hot and more importantly, healthy, at the right time. I can't think of his name, but the tall white guy might make MJ want him ala Frank, Zeller, Mullins, if Duke has a good tourney run.

Filipowski?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Shocker said:

Watching these other conferences championship games today.  The ACC does suck badly.  These teams are light years better.  Duke will not be making any type of run

All the more reason a team bringing back four starters from a national championship game team should have ran away with it in the acc this year.  Yet, they barely finished .500 in that sucky conference and are now looking at an NIT bid.

Edited by Ryano1974
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ryano1974 said:

All the more reason a team bringing back four starters from a national championship game team should have ran away with it in the acc this year.  Yet, they barely finished .500 in that sucky conference and are now looking at an NIT bid.

If it wasn't for that fluke tourney run last year Hubert would be fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're not understanding what I'm saying. I'm saying that truly elite players will always have a market because they're elite difference makers and that at the "devalued positions" the NFL has discovered that those are spots where unless you have an elite talent there you have an opportunity to get similar results out of run of the mill talent for run of the mill money compared to good talent for good money. The drop off in overall unit performance isn't dramatic dropping down from "good" to "JAG" and it saves money to invest in the premium positions. It's about skill sets and what is hardest to find, simple supply and demand. There's just more serviceable LBs and RBs and safeties out there than their are CBs and pass rushers and QBs. And honestly, a big part of our historic lack of consistent success has been investing too many premium draft and cap resources into those devalued positions. Yeah, we've had a lot of great off the ball LBs and RBs on our way to be a franchise with an overall losing record. Pointing to our success at those positions is proving my point because I just point to our W-L record and overall lack of historical quality at premium positions like QB, WR, CB, etc. We've sucked in large part because we've valued the wrong position groups. In a vacuum it doesn't matter. But in actuality every high pick or big chunk of cap you spend on an off the ball LB or RB or IOL is a high pick or big chunk of cap you couldn't spend on a QB or CB or WR or OT.
    • Right before Kuechly retired, we had some of the worst D line play that year.  We were ranked 29th against the run in 2019.   I remember even Kuechly struggled to get off the blocks at times because the linemen were on second level so quickly due to our porous line made up of Kyle Love, Vernon Butler and a washed up Gerald McCoy.   
    • fingers crossed for BlueSky embeds to come with the board update at least all the schedule reveals will be on the youtube  
×
×
  • Create New...