Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College BBall 2022


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Are any of those guys superstar talents?

 

This program needs to get back to finding those 1 and done talents. Those are the difference makers. Seem like the 1 and done talents aren't even going to college anymore.

Ingram could be if he develops a consistent outside shot.

I think the days of super stars running college ball are over, that’s why we had UCONN and SDSU in the finals.

I think college ball is now all about finding 13 guys who can come together as a team and put that NIL garbage aside and just go out there and play to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Carolina’s roster compared to last years is insane.

G - Davis, Trimble

G - Ryan, Dunn, Wilcher

F - Ingram, Wojcik

F - Withers, High

C - Bacot, Washington

If Carolina can land Cleveland then they’ll be in good shape next year. Dunlap would also be a good add from the perspective that he’d be a four year player.

I read Cleveland is down to Mizzou, Auburn and Miami.  I guess we could sneak in there though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I read Cleveland is down to Mizzou, Auburn and Miami.  I guess we could sneak in there though.

Bummer, wonder if there’s still an option for Jackson and Cadeau to reclassify. Though that means someone is coming off the bench who probably doesn’t want to.

(Davis, Cadeau, Ryan, Jackson, Ingram, Bacot).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Bummer, wonder if there’s still an option for Jackson and Cadeau to reclassify. Though that means someone is coming off the bench who probably doesn’t want to.

(Davis, Cadeau, Ryan, Jackson, Ingram, Bacot).

I personally haven’t heard about anyone reclassifying but anything is possible.

UNC will probably be thin on depth in the front court but there is some talent there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 5/30/2023 at 12:40 PM, Shocker said:

This is huge. He'll be our best true pass first PG since Kendall Marshall. I want to see what Hubert Davis' offense is supposed to look like. All I've seen is a bunch of isolation one on one ball, but he also hasn't had a real PG to work with either.

Bacot has to be tickled to death. Really excited to see what he can do with someone on the roster who can actually throw an entry pass to the post. The guy has been working his ass off because he's had to get most of his himself off of a put backs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So, I like Shedeur, but as I’ve said in previous threads, in terms of the upcoming draft, Mendoza is the one guy I would lock in on.  
    • You’re in the minority,  I’m aware of his reputation for holding onto the ball too long, but give me someone whose issue is holding onto the ball too long but can hit a wide open 50 yard air pass when it’s there over a guy who often just doesn’t pull the trigger or can’t make the throw at all. Again, the point of this thread is, no matter how Bryce finishes the year, competition needs to be brought in and an influx of talent at QB.  I happen to like Shedeur and if he was an option, as a young QB in his rookie contract, to me seems like a good idea if the price is right.
    • Scot, I’ve watched his full games.🤣. Since college.  I’m aware of the perceived weaknesses and flaws.  Yet, we have/had a front office full of paid football professionals who “full game” scouted Bryce Young and thought he was worthy of the #1 overall pick.  We also have a faction of our fanbase that, even when presented with a better option at QB, choose to keep believing in Bryce Young despite the fact that even with his occasional Atlanta games, or how he played against the Rams, he is still the statistically worst starting QB in the NFL since he’s been at the helm. So, it can’t be based off play or scouting.  So what is it based off of?
×
×
  • Create New...