Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Wilks Likely to Be 'Seriously Considered' for Panthers Full-Time HC


Vox
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, raleigh-panther said:

I always find these comments so interesting 

if Sean McDermott happened to be available, would you all not want him?

I know many cried when Bean and he were not maintained 

McDermott went to the playoffs his first year as HC.  Wilks took an 8-8 team and turned them into the absolute worst team in the league. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

I know people aren't gonna want to hear it but if this game continues like it has been on defense, It's going to elevate a lot of people's opinions about Steve Wilks.

Yeah.  Cause the D completely sucked during the first 5 games and looked amazing in the Bengals game, giving up 5 touchdowns in the first half.  Our D rocks now.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He is the head fuging coach. He is absolutely the problem 

INTERIM. He hasnt had an offseason to hire a staff that he actually wants. Im not gonna throw blame on a guy thats only truly responsible for about 35% of where we're at at this point. 

That'd be like being mad at the substitute teacher that came in the last month of school but you blame her because your lazy kid did bad at math. Choosing to completely ignore that your kids overall score went up about 1 grade during that month. 

We can blame the offense till Jesus comes but again Wilks is not the problem. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It’s simple. Win and everyone in here will say the culture is good. Dear lord the amount of time spent on these posts is hysterical. We’ve seen the end of season swoons where you can tell the team had given up with many of the same leaders that took us to playoff seasons. When your OL is decimated by injuries, it’s amazing how fast culture turns. When you get on a tear like 2015, everyone’s having fun. You need the right people regardless, but they have to win.
    • The difference is about how much player input is allowed and encouraged in the decision making process. Top down teams tend to dictate to players how everything is handled. Disagreements are handled by the coach and players are expected to do what they are told regardless of what they think or feel.  Players are perceived as commodities to be used until we find better. In player led teams player input is encouraged and valued. Players and especially leaders are expected to settle their own disagreements and be accountable to the team but mostly to each other. Players are family to be appreciated and supported in their growth. Is the reality of football the same in both? Yeah there are limited positions, football is a business and winning is the bottom line. Coaches get final say and run the program because that is their job. But in player led teams they feel valued, appreciated, part of a larger whole. Most people who have worked at multiple jobs know exactly what I am talking about. When players try to run the show and don't value  coach input that isn't a player led team, that is a circus which we surely are familiar with in our past.  
    • For our pics and trades tonight and tmrw.  Remember, Aho was a 2nd rounder and Slavin was a 4th rounder. 
×
×
  • Create New...