Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If season ended today which QB would you take.


Panthercougar68
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Fright said:

Stroud... I hate OSU, but he has the better touch and build to last in the NFL.

If you were going to take an OSU qb they should have taken a shot at Fields last year. I believe the OSU qb curse but Fields has the best shot at breaking it. The only problem he faces is he landed on the wrong team. Stroud I fear will not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

If you were going to take an OSU qb they should have taken a shot at Fields last year. I believe the OSU qb curse but Fields has the best shot at breaking it. The only problem he faces is he landed on the wrong team. Stroud I fear will not.

We will know if Fields landed on the wrong team this off-season. They have 130 or so million in cap space to repair the defense and offensive line. On top of that they are drafting high in the first. If they trade back a handful of spots they can still take a #1 WR. 
 

The Bears should be a team majorly on the rise in 2023 but we’ll see. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

We will know if Fields landed on the wrong team this off-season. They have 130 or so million in cap space to repair the defense and offensive line. On top of that they are drafting high in the first. If they trade back a handful of spots they can still take a #1 WR. 
 

The Bears should be a team majorly on the rise in 2023 but we’ll see. 

When have the Bears ever developed a qb?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

We will know if Fields landed on the wrong team this off-season. They have 130 or so million in cap space to repair the defense and offensive line. On top of that they are drafting high in the first. If they trade back a handful of spots they can still take a #1 WR. 
 

The Bears should be a team majorly on the rise in 2023 but we’ll see. 

They need to fix their line stat.  Ive watched the past 3 bears games and their line is probably as bad as ours was last season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

If I was a bears fan I would be pumped about the future, they just need to spend some cash and draft well.  I suspect they will have the chance to get the best tackle in the draft since the teams ahead of them will be focused on the qbs

I honestly don't care what the Bears do or really Fields for that matter because I'm a Panthers fan and Fields is not on our team. But I don't begrudge you being a fan so have at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Khyber53 said:

Honestly, I'd stick with Matt Corral and see what we have there. Then spend the high draft pick on the top DE/Edge rusher in the draft and give our defense some teeth.

I think that's the safer bet.

I dont think I would call relying on a 3rd round qb that cannot even practice until august with a new staff and new offensive scheme "safe".

 

There is a ton of risk with picking a qb in the top 10 but at some point it has to be done

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
    • 1st ⭐️ Big Bussi - 17 saves, .941 save % 2nd ⭐️ Logan Dankoven - 2 assists, 3 SOG, +3, 16:25 TOI 3rd ⭐️ Ghost Bear - 1 goal, 3 blocked shots, +2, 18:48 TOI
×
×
  • Create New...