Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football Rivalry Week


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

And if I'm taking up for a Clemson player you know the rule is bullshit. 

Yeah. I don’t know what you want defenders to do.   You shouldn’t kick kids out of games for that.  SC S had one last week. That’s too big of a punishment for a bang bang play 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Right, which is why I asking... why are they doing? Instead of allowing your QB to of play what Michigan giving them... you are running a mindless "hopefgully the defense is going to give us this" type of offense. It's bizarre. 

Michigan is dominating this game because they are putting constant pressure on the secondary. 

Maybe they don't trust Stroud to make the proper reads? He has struggled some this season if the first read isn't there.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Maybe they don't trust Stroud to make the proper reads? He has struggled some this season if the first read isn't there.

That's the downfall for playing a loaded team. You don't have to deal with much adversity. Stroud is still a really good QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have considered free agency.  LT?  Either not good enough or too expensive.  Besides, this is a good OT draft.  (I would rather have a free agent, mind you, but the Panthers' reality suggests we can't do it without neglecting other positions).  What LTs are available in free agency, and what do you expect to pay?  Any Ickey-level OT is going to cost over $20m.   How much do we already have invested in our OL?  I get your point, but I do not think you can spend over $100m per on your OL. We have 2 guards and a right T who pull in about $75m per season.  We don't have a center yet.  Teams just don't let good LTs hit free agency, and when one does on rare occasion, he is expensive.  If you want a third of the Panther cap going to 5 Offensive Linemen, free agency is the way to go.  We still need S, ILB, Edge, WR, etc. I think we'd need more than Nijman--and I would understand if we went free agent for a T--but that is putting a TON of your cap at OL--so considering our situation, I do not see that option as preferable.  You may disagree. If I was not talking LT on our line and thinking about the cap, I would agree 100%.  
    • Will be interesting to see how they come out tonight. The Boston game seemed to open the flood gates of media attention. And it’s not just that they’re playing well, in some instances they are getting compared with all time greats. This is still a young team, and it would be easy for an immature team to lose some focus, buy into their own hype, and think they can coast bit. The Heat are a middle of the road team without their leading scorer. There is no big dragon to slay, no big statement to make. I think we’ll learn a lot tonight: are they young but mature, or do they still have a ways to go mentally?
    • Panthers North for the win. Good luck to him. Great guy, hated to see him leave here, but he's about to work with the best QB he's ever worked with (at least on a regular basis).  
×
×
  • Create New...