Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Teams are doing homework on Jim Harbaugh


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

If players want to bitch and cry about football being serious, football being precise they can go cry on top of that million cash they sleep on top of every night.

Boo f'n hoo. Harbaugh comes to make you a damn soldier ready for battle. Not the coddling and hugging Matt Rhule was famous for.

Damn the ping pong!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t understand why anyone would want to pass on hiring Harbaugh. 
 

And if anyone wanted full control as a head coach, Harbaugh is the one to give it to. 
 

Just because we gave a moron full control and it didn’t work, that doesn’t mean it wouldn’t work with a coach who actually produced every place he’s been. 
 

People really want to pass on him because of gossip? I’m ready to win games. fug all that noise. 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

I don’t understand why anyone would want to pass on hiring Harbaugh. 

And if anyone wanted full control as a head coach, Harbaugh is the one to give it to. 

Just because we gave a moron full control and it didn’t work, that doesn’t mean it wouldn’t work with a coach who actually produced every place he’s been. 

People really want to pass on him because of gossip? I’m ready to win games. fug all that noise. 

Because some guys are way better suited to coaching college kids than they are grown adults. Harbaugh is one of those guys.

And for the record, I think head coaches having full control is generally a sh-tty model no matter who the coach is.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no delusions about Harbaugh, leaving his alma mater, where he has beat Ohio State two years running, made the Playoffs two years running, and just put together the best season in Michigan history to come to an organization that can’t even build a fuging practice facility. It just ain’t happening. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Because some guys are way better suited to coaching college kids than they are grown adults. Harbaugh is one of those guys.

And for the record, I think head coaches having full control is generally a sh-tty model no matter who the coach is.

Your draft picks are college kids. I don't get it. He happens to have been and already has coached professionals to the pinnacle.

That statement is half my argument FOR Harbaugh.

Edited by rippadonn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Because some guys are way better suited to coaching college kids than they are grown adults. Harbaugh is one of those guys.

And for the record, I think head coaches having full control is generally a sh-tty model no matter who the coach is.

I hesitate to agree because he had a .690 win percentage at SF. Maybe he is better suited for college, but he certainly produced at the NFL level. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
    • His market value is 15.7 million. Not worth it to bring him at his age, at that price. If we were to bring in a veteran, DeAndre Hopkins is available for 2 million market value. I've said this in other threads, get Keenan Allen to play the slot. He's as good as a pass catching tight end and is market is under 7 million.
×
×
  • Create New...