Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How good is Brian Burns 2022 campaign?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Carl Spackler said:

Too scared to post in his favorite thread after a win

Magically shows up after a loss

/calls someone else a chickenshit

Dude I am critical of burns in every thread.  Go read my posts. 

 

You are chicken poo for not backing up your big boy talk. 

 

Yes or no   60 pff      I suspect now the board now sees you showing your ass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Dude I am critical of burns in every thread.  Go read my posts. 

 

You are chicken poo for not backing up your big boy talk. 

 

Yes or no   60 pff      I suspect now the board now sees you showing your ass

You are chickenshit for disappearing when he plays well. I don’t give a flying fug about anything else you say, nor does anyone else with half a brain 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burns did not "dominate" last week. He only got his sacks when we went up by two scores lol

Look, nobody is saying Burns is ass (well he is in run defense), he's just not worth what we could have gotten in a trade. He's a pass specialist (can we even call him that?) that gets dominated in the run game. There are a million of those in the draft. We got duped because we are a dumb franchise. End of story.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Carl Spackler said:

So 9 or 10 DEs with fewer sacks are better DEs

Depends. Are they better at playing the run and dropping into coverage? Are they better at being disruptive in general? Do they command double teams or for opposing teams to change their game plans to account for them? Sacks are what every fan always points to, but they're not the most important thing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

Depends. Are they better at playing the run and dropping into coverage? Are they better at being disruptive in general? Do they command double teams or for opposing teams to change their game plans to account for them? Sacks are what every fan always points to, but they're not the most important thing.

he will never acknowledge that post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

he will never acknowledge that post

You have a fetish for making an ass of yourself. Unlike you, I'll say when someone's good and bad. Burns isn't very good against the run, but you're an absolute moron for thinking it makes him anything less than a standout player. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...